In the face of rapidly evolving global climate dynamics, Finland’s vast forests stand at a critical crossroads. Recent research underscores an urgent need for Finnish forest management laws to undergo significant transformation to effectively address the multifaceted risks posed by climate change. This call for legislative and policy reform is rooted in a comprehensive analysis revealing that existing legal frameworks insufficiently capture the complexity of climate-induced threats, consequently undermining forest resilience and ecosystem stability.
Finland’s forests cover nearly three-quarters of the country’s land area, playing an indispensable role not only in carbon sequestration but also in supporting biodiversity and sustaining local economies. However, with rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events, these ecosystems are facing unprecedented stresses. The vulnerability of Finnish forests to droughts, pest outbreaks, wildfires, and shifting species compositions necessitates adaptive strategies that go far beyond traditional forest management approaches embedded in current legislation.
The study highlights that Finnish forest laws have historically been designed with a focus on timber production and conservation, but without comprehensive integration of climate risk assessments. This gap creates a scenario where forest policies are reactive rather than proactive, potentially exacerbating the frequency and intensity of climate-related damages. Consequently, forests may lose their capacity to provide critical ecosystem services, jeopardizing both environmental health and socio-economic welfare.
Climate change introduces a complex interplay of biophysical factors impacting forest health. For instance, rising temperatures may extend the growing season but also increase evapotranspiration, exacerbating drought stress. Simultaneously, pest populations such as the European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus) are thriving under warmer conditions, causing widespread damage to coniferous stands. Without adaptive management provisions that anticipate these dynamics, Finnish forests risk entering cycles of degradation from which recovery will be arduous and costly.
In response, the research advocates for the incorporation of climate change risk acknowledgment explicitly within forestry statutes. This includes establishing mechanisms for continuous monitoring of climate impacts, flexible management practices that can be adjusted as new data emerge, and incentivizing silvicultural methods that enhance forest resilience. Such legal reforms would empower forest managers to implement adaptive measures, such as diversifying tree species composition and adjusting rotation ages, thus increasing ecosystem robustness amid uncertainty.
A fundamental tenet of the recommended legislation update is the shift from static, one-size-fits-all regulations toward dynamic governance structures. These would allow for region-specific strategies that consider local climate projections and ecological conditions. Incorporating adaptive governance principles ensures that forest policy remains relevant in the face of evolving climatic realities, fostering resilience not just at the stand level but across landscapes and ecosystems.
Furthermore, the integration of indigenous and local knowledge systems into legal frameworks is emphasized. These knowledge bases offer nuanced understanding of ecosystem changes over time and can provide complementary insights into adaptation strategies. Recognizing and enshrining such knowledge in forest law presents an equitable approach that enriches scientific understanding with lived experience, enhancing the overall effectiveness of management practices.
Financial and institutional incentives designed to promote adaptive forestry are also crucial components discussed. For example, subsidy schemes encouraging the planting of climate-resilient tree species, or compensation mechanisms for forest owners implementing innovative adaptive techniques, could accelerate transformative change. Similarly, institutional capacity building—training forest managers and policy enforcers to understand and apply adaptation methodologies—is necessary to operationalize legislative updates.
The study also points out that legal acknowledgment of climate change risks facilitates the alignment of forest policies with broader national and international climate commitments, such as the Paris Agreement. By embedding climate resilience into forest law, Finland can enhance its contribution to mitigating global warming through sustained carbon storage and climate-smart land management.
Beyond legislative revisions, the paper underscores the importance of integrating adaptive planning into everyday forest management operations. This approach includes iterative assessment of risks, scenario planning, and the use of spatially explicit climate models to guide decision-making. Legal frameworks must thus provide the structural support for such scientific and operational integration to become standard practice rather than an exception.
Significantly, the authors argue that public awareness and stakeholder engagement form the backbone of successful policy adaptation. Transparent communication of climate impacts on forests and inclusion of diverse stakeholder voices—from private landowners to conservation groups—ensures that adaptations are socially acceptable and economically feasible. Laws should therefore mandate participatory processes to co-design adaptive strategies promoting both ecological sustainability and community well-being.
In technical terms, the resilience of forest ecosystems involves maintaining diversity, connectivity, and function under stress conditions. Laws that support adaptive strategies contribute directly to these resilience factors by promoting mixed-species stands, maintaining habitat corridors, and facilitating natural regeneration processes. Such legal reinforcement is crucial because ecosystem-based adaptation methods are among the most cost-effective and sustainable approaches available.
Moreover, the research discusses potential synergies between climate adaptation and mitigation goals within forest legislation. For example, practices like continuous cover forestry not only enhance adaptability to climate variability but also optimize carbon storage. Updating laws to incentivize such multifaceted approaches unlocks multiple benefits and improves policy coherence.
The paper warns that failure to modernize forest laws in response to climate challenges could result in increased economic losses, biodiversity decline, and reduced ecosystem services. Conversely, proactive legislative reform presents an opportunity for Finland to become a global leader in climate-adaptive forestry, setting a precedent for other northern forested nations grappling with similar issues. This forward-thinking stance would support national resilience while contributing positively to global environmental objectives.
As climate projections continue to evolve, the study calls for periodic review and revision mechanisms within forest laws. This dynamic legal framework ensures adaptability over time, allowing policymakers to incorporate new scientific findings and adjustment needs. Embedding such flexibility as a normative principle contrasts with the traditionally rigid nature of forest legislation.
In summary, this research advocates a transformative legal approach to forest management in Finland, one that explicitly integrates climate risk acknowledgment and adaptive strategies to enhance forest resilience. Through dynamic governance, inclusion of traditional knowledge, incentivization, and alignment with international commitments, these reforms promise a sustainable future for Finnish forests amid the uncertainties of climate change.
Subject of Research: Finnish forest-related laws and their adaptation to climate change risks.
Article Title: Finnish forest-related laws need to acknowledge climate change risks and integrate adaptive strategies to enhance resiliency.
Article References:
Khanam, T., Peris-Llopis, M., Xu, X. et al. Finnish forest-related laws need to acknowledge climate change risks and integrate adaptive strategies to enhance resiliency. Commun Earth Environ 6, 332 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02284-3
Image Credits: AI Generated
