In recent years, the landscape of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education has been undergoing significant transformation, seeking to become more inclusive and equitable for all students. A particularly important aspect of this shift is examining the experiences of undergraduate students with disabilities who pursue STEM courses and majors in the United States. A comprehensive scoping review published in the International Journal of STEM Education in 2025 offers new insights into this critical area, revealing both challenges and opportunities faced by this often-overlooked student population.
The review, authored by Borrego, Chasen, Chapman Tripp, and colleagues, meticulously surveys the current body of research surrounding U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities enrolled in STEM disciplines. This demographic has historically been marginalized, encountering barriers that range from inaccessible physical environments to inadequate institutional support and pervasive attitudinal biases. The study underscores the multifaceted nature of these barriers, which not only hinder academic achievement but also directly impact retention and graduation rates within STEM fields.
One of the key technical aspects dissected in the review is the concept of accessibility within STEM education. Traditional classroom settings and laboratory environments are often designed with able-bodied students in mind, inadvertently creating logistical obstacles for those with mobility, sensory, or cognitive impairments. The review highlights innovative universal design strategies that can transform instructional methods and campus infrastructure to better accommodate diverse learning needs. These adaptations include tactile learning tools, assistive technologies, and alternative assessment methods, each of which can provide meaningful support without diluting academic rigor.
The authors also delve into the crucial role of faculty attitudes and preparedness. Despite advances in policy, many instructors lack the necessary training to effectively support students with disabilities, sometimes resulting in inadvertent discrimination or lowered expectations. This gap points to a larger systemic issue—the need for professional development programs that foster inclusive pedagogies and cultivate empathy and understanding toward students facing varied disabilities.
Moreover, the review sheds light on the social dimension of inclusion within STEM education. Students with disabilities often experience isolation and marginalization within peer communities due to stigmatization or misunderstanding about their capabilities. This social exclusion can exacerbate feelings of alienation and reduce opportunities for collaborative learning and networking, both of which are vital for success in STEM careers. The researchers emphasize initiatives such as mentorship programs, disability resource groups, and peer-led support networks as effective mechanisms to build community and resilience.
From a policy perspective, the review charts the evolution of legislative and institutional frameworks designed to support students with disabilities. While laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act have provided foundational protections, their implementation within STEM contexts remains inconsistent. The authors advocate for more granular policy directives that address the specific complexities of STEM disciplines, such as laboratory safety standards, computative accessibility, and real-time adaptive learning software.
Importantly, this scoping review identifies significant gaps in existing research. It notes that quantitative data on academic outcomes for students with disabilities in STEM is relatively sparse, and longitudinal studies tracking these students beyond graduation are virtually nonexistent. Such data would be invaluable in informing targeted interventions and in assessing the long-term efficacy of inclusion efforts.
Technological innovation emerges as a promising frontier in mitigating barriers. The review discusses advancements in AI-driven adaptive learning platforms, augmented reality for hands-on lab simulations, and customized software that can adjust to individual student profiles. These technologies hold the potential to personalize STEM education in unprecedented ways, rendering it more accessible and engaging.
However, the authors caution that technology alone cannot resolve systemic disparities. They argue for an integrated approach combining technological tools, inclusive curriculum design, faculty training, and supportive campus culture. This holistic model is more likely to foster genuine equity and empower students with disabilities to thrive within demanding STEM fields.
The economic implications of expanding access in STEM education are also underscored. Increasing participation of students with disabilities in STEM can diversify the workforce, sparking innovation by incorporating diverse problem-solving perspectives. This inclusivity benefits not only individuals but also fuels broader societal and technological advancement.
In addition to identifying challenges and opportunities, the review offers practical recommendations for universities and policymakers. It calls for the establishment of centralized disability services tailored to STEM students, enhanced funding for accessibility initiatives, and the inclusion of disability status as a standard demographic variable in STEM education research.
The psychological impact of disability-related stigma in STEM settings is another focal point. The review synthesizes evidence that internalized stigma can dampen academic confidence and discourage persistence. Strategies promoting self-advocacy and positive identity formation are thus pivotal components of retention efforts.
Regarding methodology, the review meticulously applies scoping techniques to map the breadth and depth of available studies, encompassing qualitative narratives, quantitative analyses, and mixed-method approaches. This methodological rigor provides a comprehensive panorama of the field, laying groundwork for future meta-analyses and targeted research inquiries.
The article also touches on intersectionality, recognizing that disability intersects with race, gender, socioeconomic status, and other identity markers to compound disadvantage in STEM education. This multidimensional perspective underscores the importance of tailored interventions that account for diverse lived experiences.
Ultimately, Borrego and colleagues signal a paradigm shift in how STEM education approaches diversity and inclusion. By centering students with disabilities within the conversation, the field moves closer to realizing its aspirational goal of nurturing talent unbounded by physical or cognitive limitations. The findings present a clarion call for sustained commitment, systemic change, and innovative thinking to make STEM truly accessible to all.
As institutions and educators digest the insights offered by this review, the hope is to catalyze tangible progress—where accommodations transform from reactive necessities into proactive design principles, where students with disabilities are recognized not as outliers but as integral contributors to the STEM community. The journey toward equity is complex, but with research-driven strategies, the future of STEM education can be richer, more diverse, and profoundly more inclusive.
Subject of Research: U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors
Article Title: A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors
Article References:
Borrego, M., Chasen, A., Chapman Tripp, H. et al. A scoping review on U.S. undergraduate students with disabilities in STEM courses and STEM majors. IJ STEM Ed 12, 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00522-2
Image Credits: AI Generated
