In recent years, mental health research has increasingly focused on understanding the complex interplay between psychological resilience and behaviors such as non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). A groundbreaking systematic review published in BMC Psychiatry offers a comprehensive synthesis of the latest findings, shedding new light on how resilience functions in the context of NSSI. This study moves beyond the traditional, narrow focus on individual psychological traits and embraces a broader, dynamic model that encompasses biological, social, and ecological factors.
NSSI, defined as deliberate self-inflicted harm without suicidal intent, remains a significant public health concern, particularly among adolescents and young adults. The implications of such behavior reach far beyond physical harm, often entwined with complex emotional and psychological challenges. Researchers have long suspected that resilience—the capacity to adapt and recover from adversity—plays a pivotal role in individuals who engage in NSSI. However, until now, the specific nature of this relationship has remained elusive.
The review methodically analyzed 17 studies with a combined sample size exceeding 12,000 participants. These studies collectively reveal a consistent pattern: higher levels of self-injury are correlated with lower levels of resilience. Utilizing advanced statistical techniques with meta-analytic random effects models, the authors calculated an effect size of 0.28, indicative of a small to moderate but clinically meaningful inverse relationship.
Most of the empirical work included in the review measured resilience through psychological constructs, such as emotional regulation and coping skills. This approach aligns with decades of psychological research that framed resilience as an individual trait or capacity. However, this reductive view does not fully capture the complexity of resilience, which current scholarship increasingly recognizes as a multidimensional, interactive process involving biological predispositions, psychological mechanisms, social environments, and even cultural norms.
Importantly, several studies highlighted in the review unveiled resilience’s dual function as both a moderator and a mediator in the development of NSSI. In other words, resilience can buffer the impact of stressful or traumatic events, reducing the probability of self-injury, while also mediating behavioral outcomes by influencing how individuals respond to adversity. This nuanced finding emphasizes resilience’s dynamic role in mental health trajectories, rather than a fixed or static characteristic.
Among resilience factors, problem-solving abilities and emotional reactivity emerged as key elements influencing NSSI outcomes. Enhanced problem-solving skills appear to empower individuals to navigate difficult circumstances effectively, while lower emotional reactivity may protect against overwhelming distress that can trigger self-injurious behaviors. These findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions that nurture these specific psychological capacities.
Despite these insights, the authors caution against an overly narrow conceptualization of resilience. The complex recovery journeys of people who self-injure are rarely linear or singularly defined by psychological factors. Consequently, the review advocates for a shift towards a holistic, multimodal perspective that integrates biological, cultural, social, and psychological dimensions in both research and clinical practice.
The implications for mental health care are profound. Therapies and support systems that emphasize resilience-building must move beyond individual-focused strategies to embrace community resources, social support networks, and culturally sensitive approaches. This broader framework not only aligns with modern theories of resilience but also promises to address the heterogeneous and nonlinear recovery processes often seen in individuals with NSSI.
Another critical aspect highlighted by the review is the need to incorporate the perspectives of those with lived experience of NSSI in future research. Their insights can deepen the understanding of resilience in real-world contexts, guiding the development of more effective, empathetic, and person-centered interventions. Including these voices aligns with contemporary paradigms that value participatory research and co-creation of knowledge.
The methodological rigor of the review is noteworthy. The authors adhered strictly to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, ensuring transparency, reproducibility, and high-quality evidence synthesis. Additionally, the application of R’s meta-package for statistical analysis reflects the integration of cutting-edge computational tools in contemporary psychiatric research.
Notably absent in much of the existing research is the exploration of ecological and biological dimensions of resilience. The review advocates future studies to expand the lens of investigation to include genetic, neurobiological, and environmental factors, which together could yield a more robust model of how resilience operates in relation to NSSI. This approach may catalyze breakthroughs in understanding the underlying mechanisms and tailoring personalized interventions.
In conclusion, this systematic review calls for a paradigm shift in how resilience is conceptualized and measured in the context of non-suicidal self-injury. The evidence indicates a significant, albeit modest, inverse relationship between resilience and NSSI, yet highlights that resilience is predominantly assessed as a psychological individual trait. To truly advance prevention and treatment, a comprehensive, multimodal model embracing the full complexity of resilience is paramount. This evolution in perspective promises not only to enhance scientific understanding but also to forge more effective pathways towards recovery for those affected by NSSI.
Subject of Research: The relationship between non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and resilience, exploring how resilience affects and interacts with self-injurious behavior.
Article Title: Resilience revisited: a systematic review and synthesis of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) and its relation with resilience
Article References:
Weedage, D., Kool-Goudzwaard, N., Meijnckens, D. et al. Resilience revisited: a systematic review and synthesis of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) and its relation with resilience. BMC Psychiatry 25, 463 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06868-3
Image Credits: AI Generated
