Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a pivotal technology in today’s digital landscape, influencing various sectors, including education. The advent of AI presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly within the humanities, a domain often overshadowed by its STEM counterparts. A newly developed curriculum by West Virginia University researchers aims to bridge this gap by engaging liberal arts faculty in the nuanced discussions surrounding artificial intelligence and its implications for teaching and learning in the humanities. Erin Brock Carlson, an assistant professor of English, and Scott Davidson, a philosophy professor, have embarked on an ambitious project funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities.
Carlson and Davidson’s interdisciplinary program is designed to facilitate meaningful conversations about the ethical, social, and technical dimensions of AI. Their initiative reflects a pressing need for humanities educators to engage with AI, which is frequently perceived as a technical challenge primarily relevant to STEM disciplines. The curriculum will not merely address how AI functions but will emphasize the importance of human interpretation and perspective in a world increasingly influenced by machine learning algorithms.
The structure of the program includes a summer workshop where Carlson and Davidson will provide AI training tailored specifically for humanities faculty. The goal is to enhance educators’ understanding of AI applications and to enable them to integrate AI components into their existing courses. This practical training emphasizes not only the theoretical aspects of AI but also its practical implications, allowing faculty to assess and refine their instructional methodologies in light of these new technologies.
Following the summer workshop, the researchers plan to continue their support as faculty transition their courses to include AI elements. This hands-on assistance will involve evaluating student progress and adapting to the emerging challenges that come with teaching in an AI-integrated classroom. By actively engaging faculty members in this pedagogical transition, the researchers hope to establish a stronger foothold for the humanities in AI discourse, demonstrating that critical perspectives from these fields are essential for holistic understanding.
Both Carlson and Davidson express a desire to challenge the conventional perception that AI development belongs solely to STEM fields. They assert that humanities scholarship is equally significant, particularly in scrutinizing the ethical and societal impacts of emerging technologies. Their remarks underscore the potential for collaboration across disciplines, highlighting the necessity for humanities scholars to participate in shaping conversations around AI’s future.
Interest in this initiative is driven not only by the need to educate faculty but also to create a sustainable platform for interdisciplinary collaboration. The project will involve a team of mentors, including fellows from data science sectors and mentors from humanities backgrounds. This diverse expertise will enrich the dialogues among participating faculty, providing insights into both the technical aspects of AI and its broader implications in society and culture.
The initiative anticipates the development or redesign of ten new courses that will focus on integrating AI into humanities pedagogy. By bringing in external experts to facilitate workshops, Carlson and Davidson aim to create an engaging learning environment that fosters innovative ideas and projects that critically engage students with AI. The emphasis on creativity is central to the program, allowing for various explorations ranging from AI in art production to its applications in writing and content creation.
One of the key issues to be tackled throughout this course development process is the polarized nature of opinions regarding AI. Many view AI with unwavering optimism, while others remain deeply skeptical, fearing the potential consequences of its integration in society. The researchers suggest that the reality of AI is far more complex than these extreme viewpoints. They advocate for an approach that recognizes the multifaceted nature of AI technologies, encouraging in-depth discussions that encompass their social, economic, and ethical ramifications.
In a thought-provoking statement, Davidson recounts his personal experience with an erroneous AI-generated summary of his work, which spurred his interest in understanding AI’s impact on knowledge dissemination. This incident illuminated the potential risks of relying on AI for information retrieval and critical analysis, emphasizing the importance of fostering evaluative skills among students. By honing these skills, students can better navigate the complexities of an AI-driven landscape and develop a critical stance towards the information they encounter.
The researchers are keenly aware of the environmental impact associated with AI technology, including its significant energy consumption and waste production. They plan to engage faculty and students in recognizing these realities, building awareness around the environmental cost of popularizing AI solutions. This multifaceted approach to AI examinations will help participants consider the wider implications of technology, transcending beyond mechanistic understanding to include ethical stewardship and environmental mindfulness.
In addition to practical training and discussions about social and ethical considerations, Carlson and Davidson highlight the legal ramifications of AI deployment. By exploring existing legal frameworks and upcoming litigations concerning AI technologies, they aim to raise awareness about the implications of legal traditions in shaping the usage of AI. The intersection of law and AI stands as a critical area of study, needing humanities scholarship to inform broader societal understandings.
As their initiative unfolds, Carlson and Davidson are committed to sustaining an open, inclusive dialogue that not only includes faculty but also opens doors to discussions across the wider university community. They aspire to create an ongoing conversation regarding AI that aligns with the rapid innovations and developments in the field. By establishing networks of interdisciplinary collaboration, they believe that faculty can better address the evolving challenges presented by AI.
The research team hopes that by integrating AI into the humanities curriculum, they can inspire a new generation of scholars to think critically about technology’s role in society. This commitment to inquiry-based learning lays the groundwork for a holistic comprehension of AI, encouraging students to recognize and interrogate the narratives and ideologies surrounding this technology. As conversations surrounding AI continue to grow, the role of humanities scholars becomes increasingly pertinent in steering these discussions toward ethical, responsible, and human-centric outcomes.
Ultimately, the integration of AI discourse within the humanities signifies a transformational moment in educational practice. By embedding critical analysis of AI in liberal arts curricula, educators can equip students not just with technological skills, but also with the analytical frameworks necessary for navigating and shaping an increasingly AI-integrated world. The implications of this initiative extend beyond the university setting; they present an opportunity to cultivate a thoughtful and responsible approach to technology that respects human values and promotes ethical inquiry.
As the initiative progresses, it stands to potentially redefine the relationship between technology and humanities education, illustrating that meaningful dialogue about AI must include the diverse voices and perspectives found within the liberal arts. Carlson and Davidson’s vision of an interdisciplinary, collaborative approach to AI education embodies the ethos of academia’s responsibility to prepare future leaders for an intricately woven technological future, making space for voices from the humanities to be integral contributors to those conversations.
In this imperative moment of educational evolution, the work being done by Carlson and Davidson could set a precedent for similar initiatives across universities. By advocating for the humanities in the AI discourse, they are not only enriching their educational environments but also contributing to a larger movement that recognizes the importance of ethical considerations and critical inquiry in understanding our increasingly automated world.
Subject of Research: Integration of AI in Humanities Education
Article Title: Bridging the Divide: Integrating AI into Humanities Curriculum at West Virginia University
News Publication Date: Unknown
Web References: Unknown
References: Unknown
Image Credits: WVU Photo
Keywords: AI education, humanities curriculum, interdisciplinary cooperation, ethics in AI, technology in education, environmental impact of AI, legal considerations of AI
Discover more from Science
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.