Polyethylene Microplastics Linger in Soil for Decades as They Quietly Merge With Soil Structure

Polyethylene is everywhere. It wraps our food, lines our agricultural mulch films, and sheds fragments into the ground with every season of use. Now, one of the most detailed long-term experiments ever conducted on plastic in soil has confirmed what many researchers feared: once polyethylene microplastics enter agricultural soil, they barely break down at all — and instead of disappearing, they quietly weave themselves into the very architecture of the soil. A team of German and Swiss researchers, led by Hannah Forsyth and Moritz Bigalke of the Technical University of Darmstadt, incubated isotopically labeled polyethylene in farmland soil for nearly two years and found that just 0.12 percent of the plastic had been converted to carbon dioxide by the end of the experiment.

The study, published in the journal Microplastics and Nanoplastics, stands out for its methodological rigor. Rather than relying on bulk measurements that can be confounded by background carbon, the researchers used polyethylene enriched with carbon-13, a stable isotope that acts as a molecular fingerprint. By tracking the appearance of carbon-13 in carbon dioxide released from the incubated soil, they could measure microbial mineralization with extraordinary precision. Any carbon-13 dioxide detected had to come from the plastic, because natural soil carbon carries a far lower abundance of this heavy isotope. This allowed the team to separate the slow metabolism of plastic-eating microbes from the vast background noise of ordinary soil respiration.

The plastic itself was not simply dropped into the soil as pristine beads. The researchers first aged it with ultraviolet light, mimicking the weathering that plastic undergoes in the field before it is tilled into the ground. UV exposure breaks polymer chains and introduces oxygen-containing chemical groups at the surface, which is widely considered a prerequisite for microbial attack. Even under these favorable conditions, the soil microbial community managed to oxidize only a tiny fraction of the polymer over the 22-month incubation. The mineralization rate was highest early in the experiment and declined over time, suggesting that the most accessible, oxidized surface material was consumed first, leaving behind a polymer core that microbes could barely touch.

Extrapolated to real-world timescales, the numbers are sobering. If 0.12 percent mineralizes in less than two years, and the rate continues to fall as the remaining plastic becomes less accessible, complete degradation of polyethylene in soil would take centuries, if it happens at all under natural conditions. Agricultural soils are among the most plastic-contaminated environments on Earth, receiving fragments from mulch films, plastic-coated fertilizers, irrigation pipes, sewage sludge, and atmospheric deposition. The new findings imply that virtually every gram of polyethylene ever tilled into farmland is still there, either as visible fragments or as microscopic and submicroscopic particles dispersed through the soil matrix.

But persistence is only half of the story. The second major finding concerns where the plastic goes. Using nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry, or NanoSIMS, the team mapped the location of the labeled plastic inside individual soil aggregates — the small, crumb-like clusters of mineral particles and organic matter that give soil its structure. They found microplastics and even nanoplastics lodged inside pores within 1-to-2-millimeter aggregates, spaces that are typically sheltered from water flow and physical disturbance. This means plastic particles are not merely sitting on the soil surface; they are being transported into the interior architecture of aggregates, where they can reside for very long periods and become increasingly difficult to extract or study.

The physical integration of plastic into soil structure has consequences that go beyond simple contamination. Soil aggregates regulate water infiltration, aeration, root penetration, and the protection of organic carbon from decomposition. Introducing hydrophobic polymer surfaces into these delicate structures can alter how water and gases move through the soil, and may change how aggregates form and break apart. The study also found small but measurable amounts of polyethylene-derived carbon-13 incorporated into soil organic matter and into the microbial biomass itself. This indicates that some carbon from the plastic does enter the soil’s biological and chemical cycles — not through rapid mineralization, but through slow assimilation into the organic pool that sustains soil fertility.

That incorporation, however, was minor. The overwhelming majority of the labeled carbon remained as intact or partially oxidized polymer. For the researchers, this combination of extreme persistence and gradual integration is the key takeaway. Polyethylene does not vanish in soil; it becomes part of the soil. Over years and decades, fragments fragment further, migrate into smaller pores, associate with mineral surfaces and organic matter, and effectively become a permanent, synthetic component of the terrestrial environment. Unlike organic amendments that decompose into nutrients, this material accumulates, and its long-term effects on soil health remain largely unknown.

The work was carried out under the MINAGRIS project — MIcro- and Nanoplastics in AGRIcultural Soils — funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. The project brings together institutions across Europe to assess how plastic debris affects soil biodiversity, productivity, and function. The new results provide a quantitative foundation for those assessments, offering hard numbers on mineralization rates that can feed into models of plastic accumulation in farmland. They also validate the use of isotope labeling combined with high-resolution imaging as a powerful toolkit for studying the fate of plastics in complex environmental matrices, where traditional extraction methods miss particles embedded deep within aggregates.

For farmers and policymakers, the message is clear: prevention matters far more than remediation. No known technology can remove microplastics from soil once they are incorporated, and the new data suggest there will be ample time for them to spread. Reducing plastic inputs to agricultural land — through biodegradable mulch alternatives, better recovery of plastic films, restrictions on sewage-sludge application, and improved waste management — is currently the only effective strategy for limiting the buildup. As the researchers demonstrate, every year of continued plastic input adds material that will remain in the ground long after current farming practices have changed.

The study also raises questions for future research. The incubation captured a single soil type under controlled laboratory conditions; field soils experience freeze-thaw cycles, wetting-drying pulses, root growth, and tillage, all of which can physically fragment plastic and redistribute it. Whether these processes accelerate mineralization or simply enhance the physical dispersion of particles into aggregates is an open question. What is already certain, however, is that polyethylene’s reputation as an inert, harmless filler material in soil is untenable. It persists, it infiltrates, and it slowly becomes one with the ground beneath our feet — a legacy that future generations of soil scientists, and farmers, will have to live with.

Subject of Research: Fate, mineralization, and physical integration of polyethylene microplastics in agricultural soil

Article Title: Polyethylene microplastics mineralize slowly in soil but integrate into soil structures and organic matter

Article References: Forsyth, H., Schweizer, S., Stricker, K., Höschen, C., Velescu, A., Wilcke, W., & Bigalke, M. (2026). Polyethylene microplastics mineralize slowly in soil but integrate into soil structures and organic matter. Microplastics and Nanoplastics, 6(1), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-026-00223-3

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s43591-026-00223-3

Keywords: polyethylene, microplastics, nanoplastics, soil pollution, mineralization, carbon-13 labeling, soil aggregates, soil organic matter, biodegradation, agricultural soils, NanoSIMS, plastic degradation