Acrylic glass, the transparent polymer known to most of the world under the brand name Plexiglas, is everywhere: in window panes, car tail lights, furniture, display cases and countless other products that define modern life. Yet despite being chemically well suited to recycling, enormous quantities of this material still end up as waste every year. The reason has always been economic rather than technical. Breaking the polymer back down into its molecular building blocks, a process chemists call depolymerisation, has required conditions so harsh and so costly that recycling the material made little commercial sense. Now a team at ETH Zurich has changed that calculus with a method so simple that it could be adopted by industry almost immediately.
Materials scientist Athina Anastasaki has spent years pursuing the dream of efficiently unmaking acrylic glass. Her group previously demonstrated that depolymerisation of the polymer was possible in principle, but only under restrictive conditions. In earlier work, the polymer chains had to be chemically modified to introduce deliberate weak points that would snap under heat. Other strategies demanded large volumes of solvents, substantial quantities of catalysts, or ultraviolet light to initiate or sustain the reaction. Each of these requirements added cost, complexity and environmental burden, keeping the process firmly in the laboratory rather than the factory.
The new approach, published in the journal Nature Chemistry, strips away nearly all of that complexity. Using a single commercially available and inexpensive reagent belonging to a class of compounds known as N-hydroxyimides, the researchers can break acrylic glass polymer chains apart and release the constituent monomers with yields as high as 98 percent. Once the reagent is added, the reaction proceeds on its own, with no need for external energy inputs beyond modest heating. The recovered monomers are extremely pure, even when the starting material contains dyes or other contaminants, and they can be repolymerised into new acrylic glass of the same quality as virgin material produced from fossil feedstocks.
The energy savings are equally striking. Depolymerisation with the new method begins at just over 200 degrees Celsius, whereas conventional approaches require a minimum of 400 degrees. The process also uses no solvents whatsoever, eliminating an entire category of cost, handling and waste management. Richard Whitfield, lead author of the study and a former research associate in Anastasaki’s group, emphasised that the simplicity of the approach is what makes it so exciting. In a field where chemical recycling schemes often collapse under the weight of their own operational demands, a one-reagent, solvent-free, low-temperature process stands out as a genuine departure.
The choice of reagent was the product of systematic searching rather than luck. Anastasaki’s group collaborated with ETH chemistry professors Tae-Lim Choi and Gunnar Jeschke to screen and understand candidate compounds, work that Anastasaki credits as essential to resolving many of the questions that would otherwise have remained unanswered. Even so, the team was startled by how clean the final answer turned out to be. Anastasaki noted that the only thing that surprised the researchers was that a single chemical really was sufficient to drive the reaction, a result that defies the intuition that complex polymer breakdown requires equally complex chemistry.
To appreciate why this matters, it helps to compare the new method with the dominant form of chemical plastics recycling, pyrolysis. In pyrolysis, plastic polymers are broken down at high temperatures, usually above 400 degrees Celsius, an energy-intensive process that accounts for a large share of its operating cost. Moreover, the monomers recovered from pyrolysis are often relatively impure, with impurity levels reaching as high as 3 percent. Those contaminants propagate into the next generation of plastic, degrading its quality and limiting the applications for which recycled material can be used. The ETH process, by contrast, delivers monomers of exceptional purity from a reaction that starts more than 200 degrees cooler, in bulk, without solvents.
The commercial implications have not gone unnoticed. ETH Zurich has filed a patent application for the method and is now seeking licensees, and the chemical industry has already expressed interest. A key selling point is compatibility: the process can be implemented using existing infrastructure and standard industrial processes. Anastasaki explained that the drawback of her group’s previous approaches was that companies would have had to modify their processes and equipment to implement them, an expense that most companies would find prohibitive. By fitting into the reactors and workflows that manufacturers already operate, the new method removes the single largest barrier that has kept laboratory advances in polymer recycling from reaching production lines.
Anastasaki is under no illusions about the competitive landscape. Competition in chemical plastics recycling is fierce, she noted, particularly in the United States, where large and well-funded research groups are working in the same field. What allows her to hold her own, she said, is the solid core funding provided by ETH Zurich, and this time her team is even one step ahead of its American competitors. That head start, combined with a pending patent and active industry interest, positions the N-hydroxyimide approach as one of the most immediately translatable advances in polymer chemistry to emerge from an academic laboratory in recent years.
There is, however, one small catch. The method works only with acrylic glass; different approaches are needed to break down other plastics into their constituent building blocks. Acrylic glass, chemically a polymethacrylate, possesses chain structures that respond to the N-hydroxyimide reagent in a way that other common polymers do not. This specificity is both a strength and a limitation. It guarantees the purity and efficiency that make the process economically viable, but it means the method cannot simply be extended to the broader plastic waste stream without further innovation.
Anastasaki’s next steps are to scale up the method and to gain a detailed understanding of the reaction mechanisms at work. Building on that knowledge, the ETH researchers aim to develop substances that will further accelerate polymer breakdown and improve the monomer yield even beyond the already impressive 98 percent. The materials scientist remains optimistic about extending the principle beyond acrylic glass, stating that the team will try to apply the same approach to polystyrene, one of the most widely used plastics in the world. If that effort succeeds, the single-reagent strategy that just made acrylic glass recycling economically viable could become a template for dismantling the plastic waste problem one polymer at a time.
Subject of Research: Chemical recycling of acrylic glass using a single N-hydroxyimide reagent
Article Title: New method makes acrylic glass recycling economically viable
Article References: New method makes acrylic glass recycling economically viable. Original publication (Bibliographic details unavailable.)
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: Not provided
Keywords: acrylic glass, recycling, depolymerisation, polymers, ETH Zurich, Nature Chemistry, N-hydroxyimides, chemical recycling, monomers, plastic waste, sustainability, materials science
Cite Scienmag News
Bethany Barker. (October 19, 2026). New method makes acrylic glass recycling economically viable. Scienmag. https://scienmag.com/new-method-makes-acrylic-glass-recycling-economically-viable/
Bethany Barker. "New method makes acrylic glass recycling economically viable." Scienmag, 19 October 2026, https://scienmag.com/new-method-makes-acrylic-glass-recycling-economically-viable/. Accessed 19 October 2026.
Bethany Barker. "New method makes acrylic glass recycling economically viable." Scienmag. October 19, 2026. https://scienmag.com/new-method-makes-acrylic-glass-recycling-economically-viable/

