In a recent comprehensive survey conducted by the University of California, Irvine School of Social Ecology, illuminating shifts in political favorability have emerged, reflecting evolving public sentiment within the state of California. This UCI-OC Poll, administered over three extensive phases and encompassing more than 4,600 respondents, reveals a pronounced decline in President Donald Trump’s approval ratings among Californians, coinciding with a marked improvement in Governor Gavin Newsom’s public standing. These findings underscore the complex political dynamics at play within the state, with implications that extend beyond Californian borders.
The polling data indicate a stark contrast between the political fortunes of Trump and Newsom within California. Earlier in the year, Newsom’s approval ratings appeared precariously low, with nearly 60 percent of respondents expressing disapproval of his job performance, a figure that included substantial strong disapproval. By comparison, President Trump’s disapproval remains more severe, exceeding a two-to-one ratio, confirming the challenges he faces within this predominantly Democratic electorate. However, a notable trend arises from subsequent data points showing an uptick in Newsom’s favorability, suggesting a rejuvenation of his political capital.
The catalyst for this shift, according to analysts involved in the poll, appears linked to the recent federal-state tensions surrounding immigration enforcement actions. Newsom’s vocal opposition and proactive stance during the federal government’s immigration raids seem to have bolstered his appeal among California voters, particularly among Democratic and Independent cohorts. This dynamic portrays a scenario in which state-level leadership’s assertiveness against federal measures resonates positively with local constituents, highlighting the importance of regional political agency in shaping public approval.
Jon Gould, dean of the UCI School of Social Ecology and overseer of the poll, contextualizes these findings within the broader political landscape, emphasizing the measurable benefit Newsom has gained from his confrontation with Trump. Gould suggests that this political momentum could serve as a foundational asset if Newsom pursues higher office, including potential presidential ambitions. This underscores the interplay between local governance crises and national political trajectories, positioning state politics as a significant arena for grooming future federal leadership.
Moreover, the poll offers insights into the hypothetical electoral scenario involving former Vice President Kamala Harris. Although Harris has not declared an intention to run for governor, voters exhibit a preference for her over an unnamed Republican candidate. Harris commands an 11 percent net favorability advantage, the highest among tested candidates, attributable to greater name recognition and overall positive perceptions. These indicators hint at Harris’s strong political brand within California, which may serve as a formidable advantage in any prospective gubernatorial contest.
A nuanced examination of the state’s trajectory reveals that the electorate remains largely disenchanted and uncertain about California’s future direction. A 2:1 majority believes the state is on the wrong path, with this sentiment far more pronounced among Republicans and Independents, while Democrats remain ideologically divided. Among demographic subsets, African American voters uniquely express a modest optimism regarding the state’s future, and only the elderly population segment above 80 years holds a majority view that California is headed correctly. These demographic nuances reflect the heterogeneous political landscape that defines California’s voter base.
Priorities for state funding, as articulated by surveyed Californians, highlight housing as the preeminent concern, cited by 70 percent of respondents with a significant one-third identifying it as their top issue. This priority level greatly surpasses other sectors such as healthcare, which emerges as the second most critical area but with considerably less emphasis. Such prioritization reflects longstanding challenges in California’s housing sector, including affordability, availability, and regulatory constraints, all of which contribute to socio-economic strains across diverse communities.
Partisan divisions significantly influence the hierarchy of policy priorities. Republicans demonstrate a lower emphasis on housing and instead prioritize regulatory relief, signaling an ideological preference for reduced government intervention and economic deregulation. Conversely, Democrats allocate greater importance to healthcare and education, areas often linked to social welfare and equity objectives, while assigning less importance to law enforcement and public safety relative to other groups. Independents appear to fall between these poles but share with Democrats a relatively higher concern for housing, indicating potential cross-partisan consensus in this domain.
Despite these divisions, one policy area achieves broad bipartisan consensus: infrastructure maintenance, specifically road and bridge upkeep. This consensus likely stems from the tangible and universal benefits of transportation infrastructure on daily life and economic activity. Still, its modest ranking relative to more pressing concerns suggests that voters view it more as a necessary baseline rather than an urgent priority, highlighting the challenges policymakers face in balancing immediate socio-economic needs against long-term infrastructural investments.
The overall picture projected by the UCI-OC Poll is one of a fractured electorate marked by deep dissatisfaction and distrust. According to Gould, few constituents express contentment with current governance or policy outcomes, and the partisan chasm between Democrats and Republicans remains wide and uncompromising. This polarization permeates perceptions of state direction and priorities, posing significant hurdles for effective governance and political compromise.
Nevertheless, contrasting the national narrative about Democratic struggles, the poll indicates that California Democrats may retain strategic advantages. They maintain core support among key demographic groups and align more closely with voter funding preferences, including among Independents. Additionally, Newsom’s political gains resulting from his opposition to federal policies suggest that assertive political leadership can further galvanize support, presenting opportunities for the Democratic Party to consolidate and expand its influence in the state.
The poll’s implications extend beyond electoral politics to encompass governance challenges in California. The pronounced dissatisfaction with state direction, compounded by diverging priorities and demographic cleavages, demands nuanced, data-driven policy responses. Addressing the housing crisis remains paramount, requiring innovative strategies that reconcile economic realities, regulatory frameworks, and social equity imperatives. Moreover, bridging partisan divides on funding priorities will be critical to fostering cohesive governance and sustainable policy outcomes.
Ultimately, the UCI-OC Poll serves as a vital barometer of California’s political climate, reflecting not only current approval ratings and preferences but also the underlying socio-political currents shaping the state’s future. As political actors and policymakers interpret these findings, the challenge lies in translating public sentiment into actionable governance that addresses constituent concerns while navigating the complex interplay of local, state, and federal political forces.
Subject of Research: Political approval ratings and public opinion in California regarding state and federal leadership, with a focus on gubernatorial and presidential figures.
Article Title: Californians’ Shifting Political Loyalties: Surge in Newsom’s Favorability Amid Declining Trump Approval
News Publication Date: July 2, 2025
Web References:
Keywords: Political science, California politics, public opinion, approval ratings, Gavin Newsom, Donald Trump, Kamala Harris, housing crisis, partisan polarization, state governance
