In a groundbreaking discovery shedding light on the quotidian lives of Mesolithic communities, archaeologists have unveiled compelling evidence that prehistoric people employed primitive culinary techniques akin to modern slow cooking to extract animal teeth for ornamental use. This novel insight emerges from an extensive study combining experimental archaeology with detailed analysis of grave findings at the Zvejnieki cemetery site in Latvia, an archaeological treasure trove that houses over 2,000 animal teeth dating from approximately 7500 to 2500 BC. The research not only revises longstanding assumptions about prehistoric tooth extraction methods but also offers a deeper understanding of the embedded cultural practices and material ingenuity of Stone Age societies.
Historically, archaeological focus has been predominantly centered on the social and symbolic significance of animal teeth worn as jewelry or sewn into clothing. These adornments, found on men, women, and children alike, testify to complex social identities and ritual behaviors during the Mesolithic period. However, until now, there was limited understanding of how these teeth were actually removed from animal remains without compromising their aesthetic and functional integrity. Earlier theories posited that teeth might have been crudely cut from skulls or scavenged from natural carcasses, leaving open debates about the level of intent and craftsmanship involved.
To investigate these questions, a multidisciplinary team involving experts from the University of York, University of Helsinki, Leiden University, University of Alcala, and the University of Latvia undertook a rigorous experimental archaeology program. This approach entailed replicating proposed tooth extraction techniques using authentic materials and conditions. Dr. Andrew Needham, a specialist in hunter-gatherer material culture, emphasized the challenges observed when attempting to extract teeth through methods such as cutting, hammering, or forceful pulling from fresh jaws. These tactics frequently resulted in the destruction or damage of the teeth, which starkly contrasted with the pristine condition of teeth unearthed in burial contexts.
The research team’s experimental trials, conducted over the course of a year at the Īdeņa Experimental Centre in eastern Latvia, revealed that slow cooking methods—namely pit steaming and wet cooking—were far superior in preserving the teeth’s integrity during extraction. This culinary process involved embedding animal heads and jaws in a pit layered with heated stones, hot coals, and water, effectively enveloped with animal skins and natural vegetation to trap steam. Left to simmer overnight, the technique softened surrounding connective tissues, allowing for the teeth to be removed smoothly and without visible damage. This method not only facilitated tooth extraction but also ensured that the accompanying meat remained edible and bones suitable for subsequent tool-making.
Pit steaming, as interpreted by the researchers, mirrors contemporary slow cooking practices, implying an advanced understanding of heat application and organic material processing among prehistoric people. Dr. Aija Macāne of the University of Helsinki highlighted that these cooking methods were not merely culinary but instrumental cultural practices, intricately tied to daily life and social organization. The extraction of teeth for ornamentation was a deliberate, skillful endeavor rather than opportunistic scavenging, reflecting intentional resource management and respect for animal remains.
The diversity of species from which teeth were sourced further underscores the complexity of Stone Age economies and symbolic systems. While elk, wild boar, and red deer featured prominently, the inclusion of teeth from at least a dozen other species, including domesticated dogs and even humans, paints a nuanced picture of how prehistoric peoples negotiated their relationships with the natural world. Through time, there was an observable shift from favoring large herbivores to incorporating teeth from carnivorous animals, indicating evolving cultural preferences or availability influenced by environmental or social factors.
Spatial analyses at the Zvejnieki site demonstrate that teeth ornaments were typically positioned near the head, torso, and arms of buried individuals. Such deliberate placement suggests an aesthetic or symbolic logic behind the way these objects were worn, possibly linked to identity, social status, or ritual functions. The tooth extraction process itself, embedded in everyday cooking activities, likely involved multiple members of the community, including children, as posited by Dr. Needham. This reveals a collaborative, communal dimension to what might otherwise be misconstrued as specialized craft.
Significantly, this research challenges previous narratives that construed prehistoric craftwork as the exclusive province of elite specialists. Instead, the evidence suggests a democratized engagement with material culture production, where personal ornamentation was an integral part of social and domestic life. The deliberate and careful treatment of animal remains highlights a deep-seated ethos of sustainability and reverence, with Stone Age peoples maximizing the utility of every part of the animal through coordinated subsistence and cultural practices.
These findings not only enrich our understanding of Mesolithic life but also contribute to broader debates on human-animal interactions and the origins of complex cultural behaviors. They suggest that prehistoric communities possessed sophisticated knowledge of organic processing technologies, reflecting a nuanced relationship between survival strategies and symbolic expression. Moreover, the coupling of experimental archaeology with careful site analysis illustrates the power of interdisciplinary methods in reconstructing ancient lifeways with greater fidelity.
Published in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, this study draws attention to the overlooked material processes that underpin archaeological artefacts. It invites a reevaluation of how everyday activities such as cooking and crafting intersected to produce objects that were socially meaningful and technically accomplished. By tracing the trajectory of tooth extraction from its pragmatic origins to its role in personal adornment, researchers have opened a new window into the cognitive and cultural sophistication of early hunter-gatherer societies in Northern Europe.
Credit for this innovative research is shared among numerous international institutions and scholars, with funding support from the European Research Council (ERC). Their combined efforts underscore the importance of collaborative science in uncovering the subtle complexities of human prehistory. As experimental archaeology continues to develop as a field, studies such as this pave the way for more nuanced interpretations of archaeological materials, emphasizing processual understanding alongside final artefact analysis.
This revelation about prehistoric tooth extraction methods also bears implications for understanding technological innovation and knowledge transmission in ancient societies. The deliberate use of slow cooking to free teeth without damage suggests a transmission of culinary and craft expertise across generations, embedded within the rhythms of daily life. It challenges simplistic models of prehistoric technology by showing that resource utilization was multifaceted, strategic, and embedded within social frameworks.
Ultimately, this research enriches the narrative of human evolution by illustrating that material culture production in the Stone Age encompassed both practical and symbolic dimensions seamlessly. The patience and care involved in pit steaming animal heads to extract teeth underscore a sophisticated intertwining of survival, craft, and social identity. It stands as a testament to the ingenuity of our ancestors and offers invaluable lessons about sustainability and the respect for natural resources that remain relevant today.
Subject of Research: Mesolithic tooth extraction methods and ornament production in prehistoric societies
Article Title: (Not provided in the source content)
News Publication Date: (Not provided in the source content)
Web References: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02260-0
References: The study published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Image Credits: Aimee Little, University of York
Keywords: Stone Age, Experimental archaeology, Mesolithic, Tooth extraction, Prehistoric ornaments, Hunter-gatherer societies, Archaeological methods, Cultural practices, Pit steaming, Slow cooking
