In recent years, the plight of refugee populations has garnered increasing global attention, not only for the immediate survival challenges these groups face but also for the long-term developmental and educational opportunities for their youngest members. Among the many critical aspects of humanitarian intervention, early childhood education and care (ECEC) for refugee children emerge as fundamental pillars that shape potential trajectories of displacement, integration, and resilience. A comprehensive review conducted by Stevens, Siraj, and Kong in 2023 sheds light on the intricate landscape of research surrounding early childhood education and care within refugee settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Their detailed synthesis critically evaluates existing evidence, highlighting methodological gaps and providing substantive insights into the implementation, efficacy, and challenges of ECEC in such contexts.
The crux of this review revolves around understanding how early educational frameworks and care environments impact refugee children’s cognitive, social, and emotional development. Refugee contexts represent conditions of extreme vulnerability where forced displacement disrupts families and communities, often placing children in settings devoid of formal education infrastructure. This interruption during the crucial early years of development can impose lasting detriments on learning outcomes and psychosocial well-being. The authors systematically map out the current empirical research corpus, underscoring both the critical role that ECEC plays in fostering resilience in young refugee children and the scarcity of robust, contextually attuned evidence to guide policy-makers and practitioners.
Methodologically, the review takes a critical stance on the heterogeneity of research designs and data quality in existing studies. Many investigations lack longitudinal follow-ups necessary for tracking developmental trajectories over time or rely on small, non-representative samples that constrain generalizability. Additionally, the review points out a pervasive lack of studies employing rigorous mixed-method approaches that combine quantitative developmental metrics with qualitative assessments of refugee families’ lived experiences. These methodological weaknesses complicate efforts to draw definitive conclusions and to design evidence-based interventions that respond adaptively to the diverse needs of refugee children in LMICs.
A significant portion of the reviewed literature emphasizes the psychosocial benefits of high-quality ECEC programs, pointing to reductions in trauma-related symptoms and improvements in emotional regulation among refugee children who access structured early learning environments. The stability and predictability offered by such programs can act as important mediators against the chronic stressors of displacement and adversity. However, the review also stresses that for these benefits to materialize, programs must be culturally sensitive, linguistically appropriate, and tailored to address the complex experiences of forced migration, including family separation, loss, and ongoing instability.
Moreover, Stevens and colleagues critically examine the operational challenges faced by humanitarian organizations and local governments in delivering ECEC services in fragile contexts. Resource limitations, lack of trained educators, inadequate infrastructure, and fluctuating access due to security concerns all undermine program effectiveness. Funding unpredictability further compounds these challenges, creating obstacles for the sustained provision of quality early childhood education and care. The review argues for enhanced investment in capacity building and the institution of flexible yet resilient service delivery models that can adapt dynamically to shifting refugee population patterns and contextual contingencies.
An intriguing dimension emerging from the review is the intersection between early childhood education and broader protection frameworks. ECEC is not only a developmental intervention but also functions as a protective mechanism against exploitation and neglect by offering safe spaces where children are monitored and nurtured. The authors highlight innovations in integrating protection principles into pedagogical models, fostering environments where children’s rights are upheld alongside their fundamental learning needs. This dual focus, they argue, should be a hallmark of future ECEC program designs in displacement settings.
The review also provides a critical examination of the policy landscapes shaping ECEC in refugee contexts. International guidelines, while emphasizing inclusion and equity, often remain aspirational when confronted with practical realities on the ground. The fragmentation of responsibility between international agencies, host governments, and non-governmental organizations frequently leads to inconsistent service delivery and gaps in coverage. The authors advocate for more coherent, multisectoral policy frameworks that embed early childhood education firmly within national education systems, thereby promoting sustainability and greater accountability.
Technological innovations receive mention as promising avenues to bridge access and quality gaps in ECEC for displaced populations. Digital platforms and mobile applications offer novel mechanisms for teacher training, parental engagement, and direct learning activities, especially in remote or resource-scarce refugee settlements. While the review cautions against uncritical adoption of technology without ensuring cultural relevance and infrastructural feasibility, it recognizes the transformative potential of such tools when integrated thoughtfully.
Child development theory provides a foundational backdrop to comprehend the stakes involved in early childhood education within refugee contexts. The rapid neural and psychosocial development occurring during early childhood necessitates environments that are stimulating, nurturing, and secure. The review underscores that disruptions to these optimal environments due to displacement can have profound, cascading effects on cognitive capacities, language acquisition, and socio-emotional competencies. Therefore, it calls for age-appropriate, trauma-informed pedagogical approaches that reconcile developmental science with the exigencies of displacement.
Another salient point highlighted in the review involves caregiver engagement and community participation. Refugee caregivers often face psychological distress and socioeconomic hardships limiting their capacity to support their children’s learning. ECEC programs that incorporate caregiver education, psychosocial support, and community empowerment show promise in enhancing outcomes. The authors suggest that fostering a sense of agency within refugee communities not only benefits children but also strengthens communal resilience and cohesion, crucial for long-term recovery and integration.
Language acquisition emerges as a critical area of focus, given the multilingual realities characterizing many refugee populations. The review discusses evidence supporting mother-tongue instruction coupled with gradual introduction of host country languages as effective strategies to optimize learning and preserve cultural identity. Linguistic inclusivity thus becomes essential not only for educational attainment but also for emotional security and identity formation in young children navigating the challenges of displacement.
Nutrition and health linkages within early childhood care are also addressed, recognizing that educational outcomes cannot be disentangled from physical well-being. Refugee children often experience malnutrition and health deficits that impede cognitive and emotional development. The review points to promising models integrating health and nutrition interventions alongside educational programming, enabling a holistic approach tailored to the multifaceted vulnerabilities inherent in refugee contexts.
In synthesizing the existing evidence, Stevens, Siraj, and Kong’s review call attention to the critical need for stronger, more coordinated research agendas moving forward. Prioritizing longitudinal, interdisciplinary studies with participatory methodologies can fill prevailing knowledge gaps and inform context-sensitive program design. Moreover, embedding refugee voices, including those of children and caregivers, within research can enhance relevance and ethical rigor.
The review concludes with an urgent appeal for the global community to prioritize early childhood education and care for refugee children not as ancillary services but as foundational components of humanitarian response. Investing in early years yields multiplier effects on children’s lifelong trajectories, enabling them to overcome adversity and contribute meaningfully to the societies in which they resettle. In this light, ECEC emerges as not merely an educational imperative but a human rights and development priority deserving intensified policy, research, and funding attention.
In sum, the work of Stevens, Siraj, and Kong offers a robust, nuanced panorama of the current state of research on early childhood education and care in refugee contexts within LMICs. While acknowledging the myriad challenges inherent in such volatile environments, their critical assessment maps pathways forward for enhancing scientific understanding and practical intervention. It highlights the powerful potential that well-designed, culturally attuned, and adequately resourced ECEC initiatives hold for transforming the lives of some of the world’s most vulnerable children.
Subject of Research: Early childhood education and care in refugee contexts within low- and middle-income countries.
Article Title: A critical review of the research evidence on early childhood education and care in refugee contexts in low- and middle-income countries.
Article References:
Stevens, K.E., Siraj, I. & Kong, K. A critical review of the research evidence on early childhood education and care in refugee contexts in low- and middle-income countries. ICEP 17, 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-023-00109-4
Image Credits: AI Generated
