Monday, November 9, 2026
Science
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Scienmag
No Result
View All Result
Home Science News Science Education

Why students cheat in online exams

May 13, 2024
in Science Education
Courtney Benton
By Courtney Benton Scienmag Editorial Profile - Science and Technology Policy
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0
Why students cheat in online exams
68
SHARES
617
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT

Media psychologists at the University of Cologne have studied how students’ individual needs, conceptions and reasons relate to cheating behaviour in online exams. Online exams have become a more common type of exams at universities not least since the Covid-19 pandemic. They are advantageous because they save time and offer flexibility. However, cheating attempts present a big challenge for lecturers. This is why universities have been working on ways to thwart cheating in online exams by putting organizational and technical measures into place. According to the psychologists Dr Marco Rüth and Professor Dr Dr Kai Kaspar from the Faculty of Human Sciences at the University of Cologne, cheating attempts can also signal that psychological aspects and deeper-seated problems which affect students’ learning behaviour and well-being are not given enough attention. This is where their current study comes into play. The study is titled ‘Cheating behaviour in online exams: On the role of needs, conceptions, and reasons of university students’ and has been published in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
The results of the study are based on an anonymous online survey in which 339 students from different universities in Germany took part. The extensive study consisted of three parts. 
The first part of the study revealed that it is less likely for students to cheat when lecturers demonstrate why the exam content is necessary in their future professional practice instead of solely pointing out the value of good grades for their future careers. Cheating behaviour is also less likely to take place when the exam tasks are presented as authentically as possible and are linked to future job requirements. Questions testing knowledge that check if course content has been learned by heart, however, encourage cheating attempts. In addition, cheating attempts become less likely when the lecturers offer the students detailed feedback on the exam results instead of only announcing grades.
In the second part of the study the research team examined how students’ perceptions of online exams are related to their previous cheating attempts and their intentions to cheat in future online exams. The results have shown that three considerations are of particular importance. The more negative students’ perception of online exams was, e.g. that online exams impair learning, the more intense was their reported cheating behaviour in past online exams. Furthermore, students’ cheating behaviour and cheating intention was higher the stronger the impression of the students was that online exams stimulate collaboration and mutual support among students. Conversely, students’ cheating behaviour and cheating intention was lower the stronger the opinion of the students was that online exams can contribute to the improvement of teaching.  
The third part of the study examined students’ main personal reasons for and against cheating in online exams. The three main reasons cited for cheating behaviour were the significance of grades, the perception that exams were unfair and the belief that there is a marginal risk of being caught. Among the most common reasons against cheating were moral norms and values such as honesty as well as the fear of being caught and the subsequent consequences like being expelled.  
Overall, the results of the study show that psychological factors – such as individual needs, conceptions and reasons – play an important role in the cheating behaviour in online exams. “A stronger consideration of these factors when designing courses and exam formats can reduce cheating behaviour and, in the long term, positively influence students’ learning behaviour and their well-being,” said Dr Marco Rüth, corresponding author of the study. “This could eventually strengthen the acceptance of online exams as a format at universities.”
 

Media psychologists at the University of Cologne have studied how students’ individual needs, conceptions and reasons relate to cheating behaviour in online exams. Online exams have become a more common type of exams at universities not least since the Covid-19 pandemic. They are advantageous because they save time and offer flexibility. However, cheating attempts present a big challenge for lecturers. This is why universities have been working on ways to thwart cheating in online exams by putting organizational and technical measures into place. According to the psychologists Dr Marco Rüth and Professor Dr Dr Kai Kaspar from the Faculty of Human Sciences at the University of Cologne, cheating attempts can also signal that psychological aspects and deeper-seated problems which affect students’ learning behaviour and well-being are not given enough attention. This is where their current study comes into play. The study is titled ‘Cheating behaviour in online exams: On the role of needs, conceptions, and reasons of university students’ and has been published in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
The results of the study are based on an anonymous online survey in which 339 students from different universities in Germany took part. The extensive study consisted of three parts. 
The first part of the study revealed that it is less likely for students to cheat when lecturers demonstrate why the exam content is necessary in their future professional practice instead of solely pointing out the value of good grades for their future careers. Cheating behaviour is also less likely to take place when the exam tasks are presented as authentically as possible and are linked to future job requirements. Questions testing knowledge that check if course content has been learned by heart, however, encourage cheating attempts. In addition, cheating attempts become less likely when the lecturers offer the students detailed feedback on the exam results instead of only announcing grades.
In the second part of the study the research team examined how students’ perceptions of online exams are related to their previous cheating attempts and their intentions to cheat in future online exams. The results have shown that three considerations are of particular importance. The more negative students’ perception of online exams was, e.g. that online exams impair learning, the more intense was their reported cheating behaviour in past online exams. Furthermore, students’ cheating behaviour and cheating intention was higher the stronger the impression of the students was that online exams stimulate collaboration and mutual support among students. Conversely, students’ cheating behaviour and cheating intention was lower the stronger the opinion of the students was that online exams can contribute to the improvement of teaching.  
The third part of the study examined students’ main personal reasons for and against cheating in online exams. The three main reasons cited for cheating behaviour were the significance of grades, the perception that exams were unfair and the belief that there is a marginal risk of being caught. Among the most common reasons against cheating were moral norms and values such as honesty as well as the fear of being caught and the subsequent consequences like being expelled.  
Overall, the results of the study show that psychological factors – such as individual needs, conceptions and reasons – play an important role in the cheating behaviour in online exams. “A stronger consideration of these factors when designing courses and exam formats can reduce cheating behaviour and, in the long term, positively influence students’ learning behaviour and their well-being,” said Dr Marco Rüth, corresponding author of the study. “This could eventually strengthen the acceptance of online exams as a format at universities.”
 



Journal

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

DOI

10.1111/JCAL.1299

Method of Research

Survey

Subject of Research

People

Article Title

Cheating behaviour in online exams: On the role of needs, conceptions, and reasons of university students

Article Publication Date

12-May-2024

Subject of Research: Science Education

Article Title: Why students cheat in online exams

Article References: Original research article

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: Not provided

Keywords: Not provided

Cite Scienmag News

Courtney Benton. (May 13, 2024). Why students cheat in online exams. Scienmag. https://scienmag.com/why-students-cheat-in-online-exams/

Courtney Benton. "Why students cheat in online exams." Scienmag, 13 May 2024, https://scienmag.com/why-students-cheat-in-online-exams/. Accessed 9 November 2026.

Courtney Benton. "Why students cheat in online exams." Scienmag. May 13, 2024. https://scienmag.com/why-students-cheat-in-online-exams/

Share27Tweet17
Previous Post

New surface acoustic wave techniques could lead to surfing a quantum internet

Next Post

Research on centromere structure yields new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation errors

Related Posts

Graph Clustering Enhances Bilingual News Topic Discovery
Science Education

Graph Clustering Enhances Bilingual News Topic Discovery

November 9, 2026
Research report: Towards Education 5.0 preparedness among private schools teachers in Kandahar Afghanistan in an era of human technology integration
Science Education

Research report: Towards Education 5.0 preparedness among private schools teachers in Kandahar Afghanistan in an era of human technology integration

November 9, 2026
Conservation of Resources Theory Reveals How Degree Apprentices Balance Work and Study
Science Education

Conservation of Resources Theory Reveals How Degree Apprentices Balance Work and Study

November 9, 2026
Study Identifies Key Design Features for Ethical Children AI Characters
Psychology & Psychiatry

Study Identifies Key Design Features for Ethical Children AI Characters

November 9, 2026
NTU Singapore and Google Expand Collaboration on Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Research
Science Education

NTU Singapore and Google Expand Collaboration on Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Research

November 9, 2026
Gradient-Guided Sparse Modeling Reduces Task Interference in Multi-Task Learning
Science Education

Gradient-Guided Sparse Modeling Reduces Task Interference in Multi-Task Learning

November 8, 2026
Next Post
Research on centromere structure yields new insights into the mechanisms

Research on centromere structure yields new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation errors

  • Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more optimized

    Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    27656 shares
    Share 11059 Tweet 6912
  • University of Seville Breaks 120-Year-Old Mystery, Revises a Key Einstein Concept

    1061 shares
    Share 424 Tweet 265
  • Bee body mass, pathogens and local climate influence heat tolerance

    682 shares
    Share 273 Tweet 171
  • Researchers record first-ever images and data of a shark experiencing a boat strike

    546 shares
    Share 218 Tweet 137
  • Groundbreaking Clinical Trial Reveals Lubiprostone Enhances Kidney Function

    531 shares
    Share 212 Tweet 133
Science

Embark on a thrilling journey of discovery with Scienmag.com—your ultimate source for cutting-edge breakthroughs. Immerse yourself in a world where curiosity knows no limits and tomorrow’s possibilities become today’s reality!

RECENT NEWS

  • Systematic Review Maps Respiratory Safety Signals Across GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Reveals In Vivo Redox Alterations in Human Glioblastoma
  • New Method Filters Highway Sensor Data in Real Time
  • Eyeless Mite Embryos Transiently Activate Vestigial Eye Genes During Brain Development

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology
  • Athmospheric
  • Biology
  • Biotechnology
  • Blog
  • Bussines
  • Cancer
  • Chemistry
  • Climate
  • Earth Science
  • Editorial Policy
  • Marine
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Pediatry
  • Policy
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Science Education
  • Science News
  • Social Science
  • Space
  • Technology and Engineering

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,150 other subscribers

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Discover more from Science

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading