Thursday, July 23, 2026
Science
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Scienmag
No Result
View All Result
Home Science News Science Education

Why students cheat in online exams

May 13, 2024
in Science Education
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0
Why students cheat in online exams
68
SHARES
617
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT

Media psychologists at the University of Cologne have studied how students’ individual needs, conceptions and reasons relate to cheating behaviour in online exams. Online exams have become a more common type of exams at universities not least since the Covid-19 pandemic. They are advantageous because they save time and offer flexibility. However, cheating attempts present a big challenge for lecturers. This is why universities have been working on ways to thwart cheating in online exams by putting organizational and technical measures into place. According to the psychologists Dr Marco Rüth and Professor Dr Dr Kai Kaspar from the Faculty of Human Sciences at the University of Cologne, cheating attempts can also signal that psychological aspects and deeper-seated problems which affect students’ learning behaviour and well-being are not given enough attention. This is where their current study comes into play. The study is titled ‘Cheating behaviour in online exams: On the role of needs, conceptions, and reasons of university students’ and has been published in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
The results of the study are based on an anonymous online survey in which 339 students from different universities in Germany took part. The extensive study consisted of three parts. 
The first part of the study revealed that it is less likely for students to cheat when lecturers demonstrate why the exam content is necessary in their future professional practice instead of solely pointing out the value of good grades for their future careers. Cheating behaviour is also less likely to take place when the exam tasks are presented as authentically as possible and are linked to future job requirements. Questions testing knowledge that check if course content has been learned by heart, however, encourage cheating attempts. In addition, cheating attempts become less likely when the lecturers offer the students detailed feedback on the exam results instead of only announcing grades.
In the second part of the study the research team examined how students’ perceptions of online exams are related to their previous cheating attempts and their intentions to cheat in future online exams. The results have shown that three considerations are of particular importance. The more negative students’ perception of online exams was, e.g. that online exams impair learning, the more intense was their reported cheating behaviour in past online exams. Furthermore, students’ cheating behaviour and cheating intention was higher the stronger the impression of the students was that online exams stimulate collaboration and mutual support among students. Conversely, students’ cheating behaviour and cheating intention was lower the stronger the opinion of the students was that online exams can contribute to the improvement of teaching.  
The third part of the study examined students’ main personal reasons for and against cheating in online exams. The three main reasons cited for cheating behaviour were the significance of grades, the perception that exams were unfair and the belief that there is a marginal risk of being caught. Among the most common reasons against cheating were moral norms and values such as honesty as well as the fear of being caught and the subsequent consequences like being expelled.  
Overall, the results of the study show that psychological factors – such as individual needs, conceptions and reasons – play an important role in the cheating behaviour in online exams. “A stronger consideration of these factors when designing courses and exam formats can reduce cheating behaviour and, in the long term, positively influence students’ learning behaviour and their well-being,” said Dr Marco Rüth, corresponding author of the study. “This could eventually strengthen the acceptance of online exams as a format at universities.”
 

Media psychologists at the University of Cologne have studied how students’ individual needs, conceptions and reasons relate to cheating behaviour in online exams. Online exams have become a more common type of exams at universities not least since the Covid-19 pandemic. They are advantageous because they save time and offer flexibility. However, cheating attempts present a big challenge for lecturers. This is why universities have been working on ways to thwart cheating in online exams by putting organizational and technical measures into place. According to the psychologists Dr Marco Rüth and Professor Dr Dr Kai Kaspar from the Faculty of Human Sciences at the University of Cologne, cheating attempts can also signal that psychological aspects and deeper-seated problems which affect students’ learning behaviour and well-being are not given enough attention. This is where their current study comes into play. The study is titled ‘Cheating behaviour in online exams: On the role of needs, conceptions, and reasons of university students’ and has been published in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
The results of the study are based on an anonymous online survey in which 339 students from different universities in Germany took part. The extensive study consisted of three parts. 
The first part of the study revealed that it is less likely for students to cheat when lecturers demonstrate why the exam content is necessary in their future professional practice instead of solely pointing out the value of good grades for their future careers. Cheating behaviour is also less likely to take place when the exam tasks are presented as authentically as possible and are linked to future job requirements. Questions testing knowledge that check if course content has been learned by heart, however, encourage cheating attempts. In addition, cheating attempts become less likely when the lecturers offer the students detailed feedback on the exam results instead of only announcing grades.
In the second part of the study the research team examined how students’ perceptions of online exams are related to their previous cheating attempts and their intentions to cheat in future online exams. The results have shown that three considerations are of particular importance. The more negative students’ perception of online exams was, e.g. that online exams impair learning, the more intense was their reported cheating behaviour in past online exams. Furthermore, students’ cheating behaviour and cheating intention was higher the stronger the impression of the students was that online exams stimulate collaboration and mutual support among students. Conversely, students’ cheating behaviour and cheating intention was lower the stronger the opinion of the students was that online exams can contribute to the improvement of teaching.  
The third part of the study examined students’ main personal reasons for and against cheating in online exams. The three main reasons cited for cheating behaviour were the significance of grades, the perception that exams were unfair and the belief that there is a marginal risk of being caught. Among the most common reasons against cheating were moral norms and values such as honesty as well as the fear of being caught and the subsequent consequences like being expelled.  
Overall, the results of the study show that psychological factors – such as individual needs, conceptions and reasons – play an important role in the cheating behaviour in online exams. “A stronger consideration of these factors when designing courses and exam formats can reduce cheating behaviour and, in the long term, positively influence students’ learning behaviour and their well-being,” said Dr Marco Rüth, corresponding author of the study. “This could eventually strengthen the acceptance of online exams as a format at universities.”
 



Journal

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

DOI

10.1111/JCAL.1299

Method of Research

Survey

Subject of Research

People

Article Title

Cheating behaviour in online exams: On the role of needs, conceptions, and reasons of university students

Article Publication Date

12-May-2024

Share27Tweet17
Previous Post

New surface acoustic wave techniques could lead to surfing a quantum internet

Next Post

Research on centromere structure yields new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation errors

Related Posts

UL Research Institutes Appoints Elena Zinchenko as Chief Program Development Officer
Science Education

UL Research Institutes Appoints Elena Zinchenko as Chief Program Development Officer

July 17, 2026
E-Nose Diagnostics, Rare Disease Research, and AI Medical Education Tools Emerge
Science Education

E-Nose Diagnostics, Rare Disease Research, and AI Medical Education Tools Emerge

July 17, 2026
Tips for Teachers Adapting to 21st-Century Classrooms
Science Education

Tips for Teachers Adapting to 21st-Century Classrooms

July 17, 2026
Researchers Test Tiny Molecules to Slow Lung Cancer Progression
Science Education

Researchers Test Tiny Molecules to Slow Lung Cancer Progression

July 16, 2026
Study suggests dropping SAT/ACT requirements could boost access, but hinder admissions
Science Education

Study suggests dropping SAT/ACT requirements could boost access, but hinder admissions

July 16, 2026
Simulation boosts nursing students’ home-visit training immersion, skills still under study
Science Education

Simulation boosts nursing students’ home-visit training immersion, skills still under study

July 16, 2026
Next Post
Research on centromere structure yields new insights into the mechanisms

Research on centromere structure yields new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation errors

  • Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more

    Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    27656 shares
    Share 11059 Tweet 6912
  • University of Seville Breaks 120-Year-Old Mystery, Revises a Key Einstein Concept

    1061 shares
    Share 424 Tweet 265
  • Bee body mass, pathogens and local climate influence heat tolerance

    682 shares
    Share 273 Tweet 171
  • Researchers record first-ever images and data of a shark experiencing a boat strike

    546 shares
    Share 218 Tweet 137
  • Groundbreaking Clinical Trial Reveals Lubiprostone Enhances Kidney Function

    531 shares
    Share 212 Tweet 133
Science

Embark on a thrilling journey of discovery with Scienmag.com—your ultimate source for cutting-edge breakthroughs. Immerse yourself in a world where curiosity knows no limits and tomorrow’s possibilities become today’s reality!

RECENT NEWS

  • Rannasangpei crocin-1 improves valproate-induced autism-like behaviors by reducing oxidative stress
  • Sleep Quality Links Synergistically with Frailty to Increase Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in Elderly Chinese
  • Gut Microbiome Metabolites Shape Development of Stress-Related Mental Disorders
  • Cognitive reserve helps older adults resist frailty and recover better

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology
  • Athmospheric
  • Biology
  • Biotechnology
  • Blog
  • Bussines
  • Cancer
  • Chemistry
  • Climate
  • Earth Science
  • Editorial Policy
  • Marine
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Pediatry
  • Policy
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Science Education
  • Social Science
  • Space
  • Technology and Engineering

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Success! An email was just sent to confirm your subscription. Please find the email now and click 'Confirm Follow' to start subscribing.

Join 5,146 other subscribers

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine