In an era when politics and entertainment frequently collide on digital platforms, TikTok has emerged as one of the most intriguing stages of all. Although its reputation was initially built on dance videos, comedic skits, and lip-sync challenges, it has since become an unlikely hub for political discourse—complete with troll accounts, deceptive personas, and creatively doctored video clips. The magnitude of TikTok’s popularity is difficult to overstate: in the United States, it consistently ranks among the top social media applications in usage, especially among younger users. For many political figures and activists, TikTok’s novel socio-technical affordances—short, snappy videos laden with music, filters, and voice-overs—offer an irresistibly creative outlet for delivering messages that might otherwise go unnoticed on more traditional platforms like Twitter or Facebook. Yet its very creativity and informal style can also obscure the line between authentic political content and trolling, disinformation, and subversive propaganda.
In recent years, the app’s influence has triggered growing unease among policymakers. At least a dozen governments worldwide have enacted varying degrees of bans or restrictions on TikTok due to concerns about data privacy, the spread of misinformation, and the nebulous ties between ByteDance (TikTok’s parent company) and the Chinese government. In the United States specifically, these anxieties were institutionalized when Congress passed measures prohibiting federal employees from installing or using TikTok on government-issued devices. Despite these moves, TikTok thrives as a political battlefield. On one side are lawmakers and partisans outraged by alleged security lapses or the app’s supposed role in fueling extremism; on the other side are teenagers, content creators, and political activists who view TikTok as a vital platform for expression and community-building. Caught in the middle are a rapidly growing number of “political” accounts—some verified, some blatantly parody, and some deceptively purporting to be official accounts of well-known politicians or major parties.
In the process of exploring TikTok’s complicated political ecosystem, researchers began to notice how frequently “trolling” makes an appearance. Traditionally, “trolling” is understood as posting inflammatory or disruptive content designed to provoke strong emotional reactions. But scholars also distinguish between malevolent trolling, which can involve hateful language, insults, or manipulation, and humoristic trolling, where the aim is playful sarcasm, satire, or comedic critique rather than outright harm. The platform’s youth-centric culture—fueled by memes, stitched videos, and comedic lip-sync routines—creates fertile ground for these two extremes of trolling to flourish, particularly around politics. As a result, anyone scrolling through TikTok in search of political content is likely to find a cacophony of jokes, parodies, ad hominem attacks, snappy comebacks, and heartfelt endorsements all jostling for prominence.
A newly released study has set out to dissect precisely these phenomena. The researchers—concerned that political trolling on TikTok is poorly understood—collected data from a range of TikTok accounts claiming to represent high-profile American politicians and major political parties. It turns out that many of these accounts (even some with “verified” designations) exhibit suspicious patterns, reminiscent of trolls rather than genuine representatives of the politicians or organizations in question. Over 88 posts and 8,000 comments were analyzed to reveal how online participants engage with, or react to, these questionable TikTok accounts.
One of the most striking revelations from the study is that political trolling on TikTok reflects the broader phenomenon sometimes called “politainment,” in which politics and entertainment become inexorably blended. Sure enough, many posts use background music or cartoonish graphic effects—common tools in TikTok’s entertainment repertoire—to deliver messages that range from benign commentary to overt political propaganda. But in the midst of all that politainment, researchers found an intriguing asymmetry in how Democrats and Republicans operate and how they’re targeted by trolls on TikTok.
On the one hand, the data showed that Republicans are more likely to post content attacking Democrats than they are to promote their own conservative ideals. In contrast, Democrats, at least in these deceptive or trollish accounts studied, more frequently champion their own viewpoints and agendas rather than using their posts to lambaste Republicans. This seemingly aligns with the broader findings that the Republican Party in the United States often embraces stark ideological language, while the Democratic Party aims to rally diverse coalitions around specific policy proposals.
Even more fascinating is how people on TikTok respond to these posts. Republicans’ posts appear to be trolled more heavily overall compared to Democratic posts, yet Democrats end up being the target of more total trolling comments when you consider not just their own posts but also the posts of their political opponents. It’s a paradoxical situation: Republican-leaning content inspires more commenters to chime in with trollish remarks (both humorous and hateful), but the actual “butt” of these jokes or insults—what the trolls are aiming at—turns out to be Democrats. The political content might be posted under a deceptive handle like “TrumpVlogs,” but the trolls in the comments often pivot to trash Biden or the Democratic Party, with little regard for the authenticity of the account in question.
Researchers further broke down the nature of these troll comments into humoristic and malevolent categories. Across the board, humoristic trolling—lighthearted teasing or satirical jibes—accounted for a bigger proportion of troll posts than outright vicious or slanderous attacks. In part, that might reflect TikTok’s ethos, which prizes entertainment value, comedic timing, and “viral hits” above more sober or vicious lines of political debate. Still, the malevolent strain of trolling should not be underestimated; whenever an original post specifically attacked the opposing party, comments devolved quickly into more personal vitriol and hateful speech. In other words, it seems that a certain threshold of hostility within a post can actively spur commenters to escalate the tenor of the conversation, transitioning from wry jokes to toxic harassment.
Several additional dimensions of the study stand out. Notably, most of the accounts turned out to be deceptive. Some tried to mimic the actual politicians’ official accounts, brazenly copying their style, sometimes even linking to public White House pages to cultivate an illusion of authenticity. Others claimed to be state or national party representatives when they apparently weren’t. Why construct such misleading personas? It appears to serve multiple purposes: signaling support for a political figure, sowing confusion by blending fake news clips with actual footage, or galvanizing a select in-group of like-minded or unsuspecting viewers. In this sense, the deception is not only about impersonation, but also about creating a space in which the curated political narrative prevails. Trolling and disinformation are thus tightly interwoven: one helps reinforce the other, fueling further confusion, echo chambers, and emotional reactions.
The question that lingers is how TikTok’s platform design shapes all these behaviors. From the moment users open the application, they’re bombarded by the algorithmically selected “For You” page, in which the system displays videos based on prior watch history or popular trends—rather than overt user-driven search. Could this feed-based approach inadvertently heighten the visibility of inflammatory political content? Possibly. The brief format of the videos discourages in-depth analysis or nuance, and the comedic culture of the app can trivialize serious issues. It’s also been said that TikTok’s algorithm is particularly adept at identifying users’ interests and funneling them towards increasingly niche topics. Once it notes a user’s interest in political content—perhaps by dwelling on a particular trollish clip or finishing an entire barrage of comedic political roasts—it begins amplifying more of the same. This cyclical feedback might explain why some of the troll videos in the study drew thousands of comments, even if the account in question was demonstrably fake or otherwise dubious.
Understanding TikTok’s role as a new form of “digital public square” is urgent, given that so many people now report using it as a source of “news”—regardless of how questionable that news might be. Younger generations who have never known a life without social media are especially susceptible, as they’re likely to stumble onto political messaging that doesn’t appear overtly partisan but subtly influences their beliefs through memes and viral jokes. Add to that the strong presence of foreign state actors or ideologically motivated groups that manipulate the platform, and the stakes become even higher. Evidence from the 2016 U.S. election underscores that foreign meddling through troll accounts can have real-world consequences, shaping perceptions of candidates or turnout for electoral events.
The broader phenomenon of “asymmetric polarization” in the U.S. political sphere offers an illuminating lens for these findings. Observers of American politics have long noted how the Republican Party has embraced a more ideologically extreme posture in its rhetoric, while Democrats, although they too have grown more polarized, tend to pivot around specific groups or policy proposals. This imbalance might be mirrored in the very nature of TikTok’s trolls: conservatives intensifying negativity and mockery directed toward their adversaries, and liberals gravitating toward sarcastic, comedic jabs or attempts to unify under shared programs. It’s also possible that left-leaning creators on TikTok, and their corresponding audience, have effectively co-opted the “late-night comedy show” approach, turning complex political issues into short satirical sketches. By contrast, more overtly conservative accounts frequently adopt an “us versus them” framing, rallying their followers with calls to defend certain values or culture-war stances against an implicitly menacing rival.
Nonetheless, one cannot fully dismiss the presence of malevolent trolling on every side of the political spectrum. While humoristic jibes may predominate, when an account or a post escalates attacks towards a specific party or politician, a wave of nasty comments often follows. Those commenters might lob personal insults (“He’s a disaster for America,” “Sleepy so-and-so,” etc.), or conspiratorial references to alleged malfeasance or disloyalty. This dark side of TikTok politics, where deception meets aggression, underscores the necessity of carefully examining the interplay of platform, anonymity, short-form video culture, and the psychological allure of public confrontation.
From a policy standpoint, it’s important to note that solutions are far from straightforward. If government bodies prohibit use of TikTok for official communications, they may stifle genuine outreach to younger demographics, ceding ground to trolls or fan-made accounts that fill the vacuum. On the other hand, if political actors embrace TikTok en masse, they risk normalizing an environment in which serious political dialogue is replaced by pithy roasts or sensational doctored video edits. Questions also arise about how best to moderate content. While TikTok has instituted community guidelines, algorithmic moderation struggles to capture the subtleties between harmless sarcasm, targeted hate speech, and well-disguised disinformation. Human moderators can be overwhelmed by the volume and the evolving rhetorical strategies of trolls, who adapt quickly to new rules or detection patterns.
For academic researchers, TikTok stands out as a proving ground for theories on political communication, mass persuasion, and collective action. Traditional concepts such as “echo chambers” or “filter bubbles” may need re-evaluation in a short-video context, particularly given how easily TikTok’s recommended feed can break across political lines for the sake of viral entertainment. It’s also vital to explore how deeper forces—like cultural norms around comedy, spectacle, and cynicism—shape political engagement in the modern era. The line separating “politics” from “entertainment” has blurred, leaving behind a complicated environment in which authenticity is questionable, but the potential to sway public sentiment is real.
Though the study at hand focused specifically on eight fake or unverified accounts claiming ties to Joe Biden, Donald Trump, the Democratic Party, or the Republican Party, the implications reach well beyond that limited scope. Researchers stress that a far larger cluster of political accounts on TikTok awaits analysis. The possibility that many of these accounts are “humoristic fakes,” “serious impersonations,” or simple fan tributes calls for further digging. Meanwhile, verification on TikTok is still notoriously opaque and thus not a reliable indicator of authenticity, as in the high-profile case discovered by these researchers, where “verified” proved insufficient to confirm legitimacy.
All told, one clear lesson emerges: the TikTok political universe is at once comedic, combative, and startlingly influential. Some accounts cleverly engage in humoristic trolling, coaxing viewers to laugh at their opponents while perhaps also absorbing a subtle message about electoral choices or policymaking. Others cross the boundary into more dangerous territory, stoking animosity and polarizing segments of the user base through hateful or deceptive messaging. Across these two extremes, the emotional resonance of short, snappy videos can mobilize thousands of viewers into a digital dogpile of comments, where fleeting jokes coexist uncomfortably with genuine slander.
In the shifting tapestry of 21st-century media, it may be that the greatest challenge lies in distinguishing genuine civic discourse from trollish spectacle. Even genuine politicians and established news organizations make use of comedic stunts to gain traction on TikTok, further muddying the waters. For educators, media watchdogs, and policymakers, the urgent question is whether to treat the app as a whimsical anomaly in the social media space or as a potent catalyst that might permanently reshape the public’s political engagement. For regular citizens curious about politics, being more mindful of TikTok’s entertaining but manipulative tendencies becomes a necessary skill—particularly for the young, who might confuse cleverly edited, short-form content with credible discourse.
In the long run, the puzzle remains: how do you preserve TikTok’s creative spark, the joyful swirl of memes and videos that made it famous, without letting it become a breeding ground for disinformation and confrontational political extremism? The study thus suggests that any effort to regulate or “fix” the platform will face significant hurdles—algorithmically, legally, and culturally. Politicians and the public both thrive on drama, and trolls of all stripes tap into that thirst for spectacle. Perhaps the best we can hope for is a collective push toward digital literacy. If users recognize a troll when they see one, and if they develop the habit of verifying suspicious accounts before sharing that juicy viral “gotcha!” clip, then maybe the corrosive impact of TikTok’s political side can be mitigated. But without concerted effort in media education, malicious trolls, and even well-intentioned humorists, will continue to leverage the platform’s features for their own ideological or personal gains.
Despite the challenges, TikTok will continue to be a magnet for people looking to follow, debate, or mock the day’s political headlines. It delivers compelling, snack-sized content that resonates with millions, inviting both sincere political engagement and comedic irreverence. The blending of these two impulses makes for a digital environment quite unlike anything we’ve seen before. It’s a place where clownish satirists and deadly-serious partisans jostle for clout, sometimes inadvertently reinforcing each other’s messages. And it’s precisely there, amidst the carnival of duets and stitches, that the soul of modern politics is being forged—half jest, half scorn, but always bent on shaping public opinion in 15-second doses.
Subject of Research: Political trolling on TikTok
Article Title : Political Trolling on TikTok
News Publication Date : 2024
Article Doi References : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102226
Keywords : TikTok, Political trolling, Politainment, Asymmetric political trolling, Misinformation
Discover more from Science
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.