In the midst of the unprecedented global health crisis precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers have faced myriad challenges that extend far beyond the physical demands of patient care. Central among these are the profound psychological pressures experienced by frontline nurses, a subject that has garnered increasing academic attention. A recent rigorous cross-sectional study published in BMC Psychology sheds critical light on the intricate interplay between nurses’ perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress during the pandemic. This comprehensive research elucidates factors contributing to the mental health outcomes of nursing professionals navigating the relentless pressures of COVID-19 healthcare demands.
Nurses, often regarded as the backbone of healthcare delivery, frequently endure strenuous workloads that require not only clinical expertise but also substantial emotional regulation. Emotional labor—the process by which nurses manage and sometimes conceal their genuine feelings to fulfill professional roles—has emerged as a pivotal concern. The new study probes how this emotional effort intersects with nurses’ perceptions of social support, revealing nuanced pathways influencing their psychological resilience or vulnerability. Emotional labor’s toll is heightened in pandemic circumstances, when the gravity of patient illness, fears of contagion, and societal expectations coalesce to intensify workplace stress.
Perceived social support, encompassing emotional, informational, and instrumental assistance from colleagues, family, and the broader community, functions as a vital buffer against occupational stressors. The study underscores that nurses who perceive higher levels of social support demonstrate significantly lower psychiatric distress. This finding corroborates a growing body of evidence emphasizing the protective role of social networks in mitigating burnout, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorders within healthcare settings. The researchers elucidate that social support enhances coping capacities, facilitates emotional expression, and fosters a sense of belonging—elements critical to psychological well-being during crises.
Another dimension explored by the study concerns presenteeism—working despite illness or psychological distress—and its paradoxical consequences. While presenteeism may be driven by professional dedication or perceived obligations, it often exacerbates mental health issues and impairs job performance. The authors meticulously analyzed how presenteeism during the pandemic not only reflected the nurses’ commitment but also contributed to sustained psychiatric distress. By prolonging exposure to stress without adequate recovery, presenteeism emerges as a hidden yet potent factor undermining nurses’ mental health stability.
Methodologically, the study employed robust quantitative measures alongside validated psychometric instruments to capture the multifaceted experiences of nurses. The cross-sectional design enabled an extensive snapshot of the relationships among perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress across diverse healthcare settings amid the pandemic. The analysis incorporated demographic variables, occupational factors, and contextual pandemic severity indicators to ensure comprehensive understanding. This methodological rigor fortifies the study’s contributions to occupational psychology and healthcare management literatures.
One of the novel contributions of the research lies in its integrative approach. Rather than isolating individual factors, the authors examined the dynamic interrelations—how emotional labor might mediate or moderate the impact of social support on psychiatric outcomes and how presenteeism interplays within this complex matrix. The findings advocate for multidimensional strategies in mental health interventions for nurses, recognizing that addressing emotional labor demands and fostering robust social support systems are equally essential to curbing presenteeism and associated distress.
The implications of these findings resonate profoundly in the context of policy and healthcare administration. The clear linkage between perceived social support and reduced psychiatric distress reinforces the imperative to cultivate supportive work environments. Initiatives such as peer support programs, open communication channels, and accessible mental health resources become indispensable. Moreover, organizational policies must acknowledge and mitigate the pressures leading to presenteeism, perhaps through flexible sick leave policies and stigma reduction regarding mental health disclosures.
From a clinical perspective, the study emphasizes the need for targeted psychological interventions that address emotional labor. Training programs designed to enhance emotional regulation skills, resilience-building workshops, and mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques hold promise. Implementation of such interventions, tailored to the pandemic’s unique stresses, could alleviate the cumulative psychological burden on nurses, thereby preserving workforce sustainability and quality of patient care.
Furthermore, the research invites broader societal recognition of nurses’ emotional contributions, which often remain invisible despite their centrality to healthcare delivery. Public health campaigns and media narratives might better capture the emotional realities faced by nurses, fostering empathy and community support. Given that social support extends beyond immediate workgroups to encompass societal attitudes, such cultural shifts could profoundly influence nurses’ psychological well-being.
The study also sheds light on the intersectionality of demographic variables, revealing differential impacts based on age, gender, and years of professional experience. For instance, younger nurses or those earlier in their careers exhibited heightened vulnerability to psychiatric distress, potentially due to less developed coping mechanisms or social support networks. Gender differences in emotional labor roles were observed, reflecting broader societal gender norms that shape emotional expression and labor expectations. These insights highlight the necessity of nuanced, tailored support strategies that respond to demographic diversity within the nursing workforce.
In the broader context of health crisis preparedness, the findings stress that psychological preparedness must be prioritized alongside logistical and clinical readiness. The pandemic underscored gaps in addressing healthcare workers’ mental health needs, and research such as this provides empirical foundations to redesign support systems. Investing in mental health infrastructures and embedding psychological resilience components in emergency planning will better position health systems to sustain workforce well-being in future crises.
Academic discourse around the pandemic’s psychological impact on healthcare workers is rapidly expanding, and this study stands as a pivotal contribution. By articulating the interwoven effects of social support, emotional labor, and presenteeism on psychiatric distress, it advances conceptual models of occupational stress and mental health in frontline nursing. The research bridges psychological theory and practical application, suggesting actionable pathways to enhance mental health outcomes while maintaining organizational effectiveness.
A particularly pressing takeaway is the pressing need to recognize and validate emotional labor as a formal dimension of occupational health considerations. Often overshadowed by physical workload and technical challenges, emotional labor demands substantial cognitive and affective resources, which, when unrecognized, lead to invisibilized burnout and psychological wear. This study calls for integrative occupational health paradigms that explicitly include emotional labor assessments and interventions.
In light of these findings, healthcare leaders are urged to re-examine staffing models, workload distributions, and support infrastructures. Ensuring adequate rest periods, psychological safety, and opportunities for peer connection during shifts could mitigate the cumulative psychological toll observed. Additionally, creating cultures where seeking mental health support is destigmatized and facilitated could reduce presenteeism and its deleterious effects.
Looking forward, the study opens avenues for longitudinal research investigating how these relationships evolve as pandemics transition to endemic phases or as healthcare systems undergo recovery processes. Understanding temporal dynamics of social support and emotional labor influences will better inform sustained mental health strategies. Moreover, expanding research to diverse geographical and cultural contexts can elucidate culturally specific factors and universal principles alike.
Ultimately, this landmark study elevates the discourse on nurses’ mental health by providing a rigorous, multifactorial analysis during one of modern history’s most challenging healthcare crises. Its insights serve as both a clarion call and a roadmap for healthcare systems, policymakers, and societies to prioritize psychological well-being alongside clinical efficacy. As the world continues to grapple with COVID-19 and prepares for future health emergencies, integrating these psychological insights will be critical to sustaining a resilient, compassionate, and effective nursing workforce.
Subject of Research: Psychological factors affecting nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress.
Article Title: Relationships between nurses’ perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.
Article References:
Ebrahimi, H., Rahmani, F. & Ghorbani, K. Relationships between nurses’ perceived social support, emotional labor, presenteeism, and psychiatric distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol 13, 458 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02721-0
Image Credits: AI Generated
