In a comprehensive panel data study encompassing 30 provinces across China from 2011 to 2022, researchers have shed new light on the intricate relationship between agricultural industrial agglomeration and the multidimensional patterns of labour outflows. The analysis reveals a compelling inverse correlation: as agricultural industrial agglomeration intensifies, there is a notable decline in labour migration, whether locally within counties, between counties, or across provinces. This discovery substantiates theoretical claims that agglomeration, by fostering enhanced efficiency and productivity within agricultural sectors, can strategically influence workforce distribution, reducing the economic necessity for labour mobility.
Delving into the mechanistic underpinnings, the study attributes this pattern to the role of agglomeration in streamlining resource allocation and extending industrial value chains, which collectively elevate local income levels. This economic uplift tends to anchor labour forces more firmly in situ, dampening the impetus for migration. The evidence suggests that agglomeration serves not merely as an economic phenomenon but as a considerable social stabiliser in rural and semi-urban contexts, modifying traditional migration incentives. Such findings corroborate earlier research while deploying an expanded temporal and spatial dataset that lends greater robustness and nuance to the conclusions.
Regional heterogeneity emerges as a crucial dimension affecting the labour outflow-agglomeration nexus. In China’s economically advanced eastern provinces, agricultural agglomeration predominantly influences mobility confined to intra-county and intra-provincial scales, reflecting what the authors describe as a “proximity adsorption” effect. This phenomenon underscores the tendency for agglomerated regions to retain labour within immediate geographic vicinities, reinforcing localized economic ecosystems. In contrast, the western provinces exhibit a more pronounced suppressive effect on longer-distance migration, including inter-provincial flows, indicative of agglomeration’s role in bolstering local employment and restraining labour fragmentation in less developed regions.
The research further assesses mobility dynamics within the northeastern provinces and highlights subtle yet significant patterns. Here, agricultural industrial concentration impacts labour movement primarily within counties, lacking a clear absorptive influence on migration across county borders. This suggests that agglomeration mechanisms in these areas have yet to mature into fully stabilising forces for broader regional labour retention, highlighting opportunities for policy intervention to harness potential employment stabilisation effects extending beyond narrow spatial confines. In central provinces, meanwhile, the influence of agglomeration exhibits moderate complexity, with nuanced negative correlations observed predominantly at the inter-county level, suggesting region-specific mechanisms that warrant deeper exploration.
An exploration of control variables enriches the interpretive landscape of the study. The urbanisation rate demonstrates a consistent negative association with medium- and long-distance labour migration. Urbanised zones appear effective in mitigating labour exodus by provisioning better local employment opportunities, thereby providing structural incentives to remain. Contrastingly, transport network density manifests positive correlations with labour outflows in multiple instances. This reveals a paradoxical dynamic whereby improved accessibility facilitates mobility, but may also exacerbate ‘transit migrations’ where workers traverse regions temporarily without establishing residency, emphasizing nuanced infrastructure roles in migration trends.
Further economic metrics additionally illuminate migration patterns. GDP per capita correlates positively with labour out-migration, a counterintuitive phenomenon suggesting that higher regional prosperity might inadvertently increase migration propensity, potentially through elevated living costs or structural crowding out of employment prospects. Agricultural subsidies occasionally align positively with outflows, indicating complex and perhaps regionally variable policy impacts where financial stimuli do not uniformly translate into labour retention, adding layers of interpretive challenge.
By advancing understanding beyond simplistic industrial-economic models, the study integrates multi-scalar analytic frameworks and regional differentiation to unpack labour mobility mechanisms. The dualistic nature of agricultural agglomeration emerges clearly: on one hand, it exerts an ‘adsorption effect’ that attracts and retains local labour within proximal zones, while, on the other, it wields a ‘repulsion effect’ that may suppress long-distance migration in specific regional contexts. This duality reflects the intricate balance between economic opportunity and social mobility, modulated by regional disparities in development and infrastructure.
From a theoretical standpoint, this research innovatively advances migration theory by dissecting labour flows across hierarchical geographic scales instead of treating migration as a monolithic phenomenon. By differentiating movement patterns within communes, counties, and provinces, it offers a more granular lens on migration dynamics. This approach advances both the economic geography of industrial agglomeration and the sociology of migration, enriching the conceptual toolkit available to scholars examining rural labour transformations amidst rapid economic change.
Additionally, by applying a framework that interweaves labour economics, industrial geography, and regional development theories, the study presents a multidimensional understanding of migration. It highlights the interrelated influence of income disparities, employment opportunities, transport infrastructures, institutional environments, and policy instruments, underscoring labour migration as an outcome of complex systemic interactions rather than isolated variables. This integrative perspective signals a methodological advance in migration research, potentially inspiring cross-disciplinary scholarship.
Policy implications derived from these findings are significant and regionally nuanced. They caution against one-size-fits-all interventions and advocate for tailored strategies cognizant of provincial developmental contexts. In eastern regions, fostering rural-urban integration and upgrading the agricultural industry chain could promote rational mobility within provinces, optimize labour distribution, and enhance rural attractiveness. In less developed western and northeastern areas, investment priorities should tilt toward educational infrastructure, transport connectivity, and strengthening the employment ‘lock-in’ effect, thereby stabilising labour pools and encouraging sustainable regional economic growth.
The study also highlights the critical need to align agricultural industrial policies with labour market strategies. Agglomerations should be conceptualized not as isolated industrial hubs but as interconnected nodes embedded within wider urban-rural development ecosystems. Enhancing agglomerations’ labour-absorbing capacities through targeted vocational training, employment guarantees, and social welfare measures could transform these clusters into stable employment nuclei, thus reducing involuntary migration and fostering rural resilience.
Beyond China, these insights carry considerable weight for developing countries experiencing similar urban-rural dualities and regional disparities. Tailoring agricultural modernisation strategies alongside migration management policies could accelerate structural transformations while ensuring equitable population distributions. However, the authors advise careful contextual adaptation, emphasizing that institutional realities, industrial bases, and demographic pressures vary widely across countries and necessitate bespoke policy designs.
Despite the rigor of this study, the authors acknowledge methodological and data limitations. The complex, potentially nonlinear interplay among factors influencing labour mobility calls for analytical approaches beyond single-factor linear models, while the current study’s scope limits granular causal exploration. To address these gaps, the team has initiated a follow-up project leveraging group structure theory and configurational analysis to decode multi-causal relationships shaping migrant labour outflows. This pioneering effort aims to unravel critical pathways influencing labour mobility and retention in contemporary economic contexts.
Currently transitioning into its field research phase, the ongoing project aspires to collaborate with multidisciplinary experts to elevate theoretical frameworks and inform policy implementations. Such future work promises to deepen understanding of migration behaviours amid agricultural transformation, potentially enabling more effective governance of rural labour markets in China and comparable global settings.
In sum, this investigation offers groundbreaking empirical evidence and theoretical refinements on the complex roles of agricultural industrial agglomeration in shaping labour migration patterns. By reconciling spatial, economic, and institutional dimensions, it challenges simplified narratives and encourages sophisticated, regionally sensitive policy responses. As the global community grapples with rural development and migration challenges, such nuanced insights are invaluable for informing sustainable strategies that harmonize economic growth with social stability.
Article References:
Zhang, X., Lu, S., Zhang, Z. et al. Impact mechanism of agricultural industry agglomeration on labour outflow directions in China. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 977 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05317-6
Image Credits: AI Generated
