In recent decades, the transition from living in the family home to establishing an independent household has become a focal point of demographic and socioeconomic research. This transition, often referred to simply as “leaving home,” carries profound implications for individuals’ life courses, family structures, and broader social dynamics. A new study by scholars Stefano Meggiolaro and Francesco Ongaro sheds fresh light on this phenomenon by examining how economic vulnerability—rooted in labor market status—affects the timing and likelihood of leaving the parental home among recent cohorts in Italy. Published in the journal Genus, this work contributes to a growing academic discourse exploring how labor market instability redefines key milestones in young people’s lives in contemporary societies.
The Italian context is particularly compelling due to its unique combination of strong familial ties and persistent economic challenges faced by young people. Italy, like many southern European countries, is characterized by historically late home-leaving ages compared to northern Europe, with many young adults residing with their parents well into their late twenties or even thirties. This pattern, often linked to cultural preferences and economic necessities, interacts with fluctuating labor market conditions that have grown increasingly precarious over recent years. Meggiolaro and Ongaro’s study interrogates how economic vulnerability, manifest through unemployment, temporary contracts, and unstable career trajectories, shapes young Italians’ decisions regarding autonomy and home departure.
The theoretical framework underpinning their research draws from concepts in economic sociology and life course studies. Economic vulnerability is understood not merely as poverty or low income but as a multidimensional risk encompassing employment instability, low earnings security, and limited social protection. Such vulnerability can delay or disrupt the normative life transition of moving out, as young adults may lack the financial resources to afford independent living or may prioritize joint living arrangements as a safety net. Conversely, the quest for independence might be accelerated by unemployment if leaving home becomes a strategy to reduce family financial burden or to accommodate upskilling or job searching elsewhere.
To explore these dynamics, the authors utilize rich longitudinal data sets capturing recent Italian cohorts, observed over critical periods of youth and early adulthood. Their quantitative analyses incorporate detailed measures of labor market status, including distinctions among permanent, temporary, and unemployed categories. These are linked to longitudinal indicators of residential status—namely, whether individuals continue to reside with parents or have established independent households. Importantly, the study controls for relevant confounders such as educational attainment, gender, region, and familial socioeconomic status, allowing for a nuanced exploration of the interplay between labor market conditions and residential transitions.
Findings from this research underscore the centrality of economic vulnerability in shaping home-leaving trajectories in Italy. Young adults experiencing unemployment or unstable employment conditions are significantly more likely to delay leaving their parental home compared to their peers with stable, permanent jobs. This effect persists even when accounting for educational differences and regional disparities. The study also highlights gendered nuances: men are generally more susceptible to delayed home-leaving in the face of economic precarity, reflecting traditional gender roles and expectations that position men as economic providers.
An especially novel contribution of Meggiolaro and Ongaro’s work is the stratified analysis by cohorts, capturing how labor market transformations over recent decades influence home-leaving patterns differently across generations. While older cohorts might have benefited from more secure employment and stable career paths facilitating earlier home-leaving, younger cohorts confront a labor market increasingly characterized by temporary contracts and precarious job prospects. Consequently, the relationship between economic vulnerability and residential decisions has intensified, with recent cohorts demonstrating heightened sensitivity to labor market status when deciding whether and when to leave home.
Beyond individual labor market status, the study situates these micro-level decisions within macroeconomic and policy environments. Italy’s labor regulations and social welfare provisions shape young adults’ capacity to transition to independent living. Limited access to affordable housing, coupled with fragmented social safety nets, exacerbate the effects of labor market insecurity. Thus, the authors argue for a holistic understanding of home-leaving patterns that integrates labor market conditions with institutional and housing market structures.
Moreover, the research offers implications for social inequalities. Economic vulnerability linked to unstable employment can perpetuate disparities in family formation, educational opportunities, and social mobility. Delayed home-leaving may hinder young adults’ ability to engage fully in societal participation, from pursuing higher education to forming partnerships or parenthood. This dynamic reinforces cycles of disadvantage, as prolonged co-residence with parents can be both a consequence and a cause of economic marginalization.
The article challenges policymakers to consider how labor market reforms aiming to increase employment flexibility might inadvertently delay young adults’ independence by fostering economic insecurity. Initiatives promoting stable employment contracts and expanding social protections for young workers could mitigate these adverse effects, fostering more timely home-leaving and enabling smoother transitions to adulthood. Additionally, policies enhancing affordable housing availability would benefit youth facing economic vulnerability, providing practical means to achieve residential independence.
Methodologically, the study exemplifies rigorous demographic and sociological analysis through longitudinal data integration and multivariate statistical modeling. Its approach captures not only snapshots but dynamic trajectories of labor market conditions and residential status. By contextualizing individual behaviors within broader economic and policy frameworks, it contributes methodologically to life course research, encouraging future investigations to adopt similarly multifaceted lenses.
The research by Meggiolaro and Ongaro also interacts with broader European debates on youth transitions and welfare state configurations. Comparisons with countries displaying earlier average home-leaving ages, such as those in Northern Europe, highlight how labor market policies and welfare generosity intertwine with cultural and economic factors. This comparative perspective evidences how Italy, despite strong family networks traditionally seen as protective, faces unique vulnerabilities amid economic transformations that reshape life course expectations.
Critically, the study refrains from reducing home-leaving solely to economic determinism, acknowledging the role of personal aspirations, social norms, and familial relations in these decisions. However, it convincingly argues that without addressing labor market-induced economic vulnerabilities, such sociocultural factors cannot operate independently, given that financial viability remains a foundational constraint.
In sum, Meggiolaro and Ongaro’s research illuminates a crucial aspect of modern youth transitions—the delicate balance between economic opportunity and the pursuit of independence. Their findings underscore that in Italy, economic vulnerability grounded in labor market status does indeed matter deeply for when and how young adults leave the parental home. This insight invites further scholarly attention and policy innovation targeting the socioeconomic environments that shape life trajectories during the formative years of adulthood.
As societies worldwide grapple with increasing labor market precarity, understanding the implications for youth autonomy is vital. This study offers a compelling case for Italy but resonates far beyond, capturing a transformation in how economic structures influence the personal and social milestones that define the passage to adulthood.
Subject of Research: The impact of economic vulnerability and labor market status on the timing of leaving the parental home among recent cohorts in Italy.
Article Title: Leaving home across the recent cohorts in Italy: does economic vulnerability due to labour market status matter?
Article References:
Meggiolaro, S., Ongaro, F. Leaving home across the recent cohorts in Italy: does economic vulnerability due to labour market status matter?. Genus 80, 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-024-00213-4
Image Credits: AI Generated
