In recent years, the quest to balance environmental oversight with economic productivity has taken center stage in global policy discourse. Amid this backdrop, China’s central environmental protection inspection (CEPI) initiative has emerged as a critical experiment in vertical supervision, seeking to elevate environmental governance from local to central authority. This transition is not merely bureaucratic; it promises to reshape the contours of labor productivity across Chinese firms by imposing stricter environmental standards while fostering sustainable economic practices. A comprehensive empirical study has now rigorously tested this paradigm, revealing robust evidence that CEPI indeed enhances labor productivity, offering deep insights into the mechanisms and contextual nuances underlying this effect.
The study began by meticulously analyzing labor productivity across a wide-ranging sample of firms, unveiling notable variability. Labor productivity, measured primarily by operating revenue per employee, averaged at 13.79 in logarithmic terms, with a standard deviation of 0.851. Such diversification underscores the heterogeneous nature of firm performance and the potential sensitivity to environmental policies. Notably, about 52.1% of firms were directly subjected to CEPI’s scrutiny, providing a rich dataset to explore causal relationships through quasi-experimental econometric models.
Central to the analysis was the fixed-effects regression design, blended with staggered difference-in-differences (DID) techniques, to distill the net effect of CEPI on productivity. Baseline regressions controlling for year, industry, and province fixed effects consistently generated statistically significant positive coefficients for CEPI, ranging from 0.029 to 0.040. These results persisted across a series of increasingly stringent models, including those controlling for firm fixed effects, thereby accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. The stability of these estimates across varying specifications robustly supports the hypothesis that vertical supervision positively influences labor productivity.
Critically, the authors did not stop at baseline correlations. To ensure the attribution of observed productivity shifts to CEPI was not confounded by underlying trends, a rigorous parallel trend test was applied. This approach verified that treatment and control groups shared similar pre-intervention labor productivity trajectories, thereby satisfying a core assumption of causal inference in DID frameworks. Only after confirming this temporal alignment did the analysis endorse the subsequent positive impacts of CEPI, which notably amplified over time, signaling not only effectiveness but also persistence.
Addressing potential endogeneity and selection bias concerns, the researchers deployed an array of robustness tests. Placebo tests involving randomized treatment assignment and repeated regressions substantiated that the observed effects could not be attributed to chance. Additionally, contemporary analytical advances dealing with staggered treatments, such as bias-corrected and inverse probability-weighted DID estimators, were employed, confirming the core findings. Furthermore, matching methodologies like propensity score matching and entropy balancing balanced covariates between treatment and control samples, underscoring that the productivity gains stem from CEPI rather than sample selection artifacts.
To examine the robustness of results further, alternative measures of labor productivity were incorporated, such as adjusted operating revenues excluding non-operating income and total production per employee metrics. Both modifications preserved the positive association between CEPI and productivity, reinforcing the generalizability of findings beyond specific dependent variable operationalizations. The study also tested alternative definitions for treatment timing based on mid- and late-year inspection starts, which again resulted in positive and statistically significant coefficients, underscoring the consistency of CEPI’s effect regardless of timing nuances.
Given the complex policy environment in China, the influence of concurrent policies was methodically isolated. Significant reforms, including the 2016 production capacity reduction, the 2015 revised Environmental Protection Law, and the establishment of environmental courts, all potentially interact with labor productivity trends. By introducing policy dummies to account for these factors, the analysis demonstrated that controlling for such contemporaneous influences does not diminish the positive CEPI effect. This meticulous approach strengthens confidence that the vertical supervision mechanism is the primary driver of improved labor productivity.
The investigation further isolated specific potential confounders, such as the “look-back” inspections initiated in May 2018 and operational location changes within firms. By excluding samples affected by these factors, the researchers ensured that the positive productivity outcomes were not artifacts of inspection repetition or geographic shifts, enhancing the internal validity of the study. Such comprehensive exclusion criteria reinforce the conclusion that CEPI exerts an independent, favorable influence on firm productivity.
Delving beyond empirical associations, the study explored the mechanisms through which CEPI fosters labor productivity enhancements. It proposed that the vertical inspection regime strengthens local governments’ commitment, enforcement intensity, and governance effectiveness, verified through rigorous mediation analyses. One proxy was the frequency of environmental keywords in local government reports, reflecting environmental governance willingness. The tangible rise in such commitment post-CEPI, coupled with significant mediation statistics, supports that local leadership buy-in plays a critical role.
Simultaneously, enforcement intensity increased, as evidenced by elevated per capita environmental fines, signifying that local governments moved from rhetoric to meaningful penalties under CEPI supervision. This enforcement uptick independently mediated labor productivity gains, signaling that stricter regulatory application compels firms to prioritize efficient, pollution-reducing adjustments. Additionally, improvements in regional air quality, quantified via AQI and PM2.5 metrics, demonstrated enhanced environmental governance effectiveness. This ecological dimension not only affirms the environmental legitimacy of CEPI but illustrates an environment-productivity nexus whereby better air quality catalyzes firm-level performance.
Recognizing the heterogeneous nature of China’s vast economy, the research conducted subgroup analyses to uncover how CEPI’s effectiveness varies across contexts. Examining firm ownership, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) exhibited a significantly greater productivity response compared to private firms. This divergence aligns with theoretical expectations, given SOEs’ dual role as revenue sources and employment pillars, which incentivize local governments to shield them—an ability curtailed by central vertical inspections. Consequently, CEPI lifts the veil of protection, enforcing compliance more stringently for SOEs and thus generating more pronounced productivity improvements.
Furthermore, regional resource dependence emerged as a pivotal moderating factor. Areas with lower resource reliance, characterized by smaller secondary industry output ratios, demonstrated stronger CEPI impacts. These regions, with more flexible and less resource-intensive production structures, adapt more rapidly to environmental regulation-induced shifts, contrasting with heavily resource-dependent economies where adjustment costs stifle responsiveness. This insight illustrates the importance of local economic composition in modulating policy efficacy.
Environmental legislative completeness also modulated CEPI’s effectiveness. Provinces with richer bodies of environmental laws and regulations benefitted more substantially from vertical supervision. A comprehensive legal framework provides clear enforcement standards and amplifies pressure on firms, making vertical interventions more impactful. Without such systemic legal underpinnings, vertical supervision may falter, highlighting the interplay of institutional quality and policy outcomes.
Altogether, this study offers a compelling, multifaceted examination of how vertical environmental supervision through CEPI advances labor productivity within China’s complex economic and institutional landscape. By integrating robust econometric strategies, extensive robustness checks, and nuanced heterogeneity and mechanism analyses, it provides one of the most comprehensive empirical validations of vertical governance’s capacity to reconcile environmental sustainability with economic performance. Its implications extend well beyond China, offering a model for other nations grappling with effective environmental oversight amid evolving economic priorities.
As the world increasingly confronts pressing environmental challenges alongside economic development imperatives, insights from this research underscore the promise of vertically integrated governance structures. By enhancing local commitment, intensifying enforcement, and leveraging robust legal frameworks, vertical supervision mechanisms can overcome local protectionism and enforcement laxity. This leads not merely to cleaner environments but also to substantial productivity gains, emphasizing sustainability as a pathway to competitive advantage rather than a cost center.
Future research trajectories may build upon these findings by exploring additional mediating factors such as technological innovation adoption or firm-level environmental investments prompted by vertical supervision. Examining longer-term outcomes could also reveal whether productivity gains are sustained or morph as compliance pressures evolve. Comparative analyses across countries would elucidate how institutional differences shape vertical supervision effectiveness, offering tailored policy insights.
In summation, the empirical evidence from China’s CEPI experience illuminates a transformative intersection of governance, environment, and productivity. It demonstrates that rigorous, centralized environmental supervision can transcend traditional trade-offs, catalyzing more efficient, sustainable economic activity. For policymakers, businesses, and scholars alike, these findings offer a roadmap for harnessing regulatory frameworks to foster resilient, green growth in an increasingly complex global economy.
Subject of Research: Impact of vertical environmental supervision on labor productivity in Chinese firms.
Article Title: Does vertical supervision enhance labor productivity? Evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection.
Article References:
Xie, W., Guo, J., Zhang, H. et al. Does vertical supervision enhance labor productivity? Evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 637 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04958-x
Image Credits: AI Generated
