A cross-sectional study of 1,012 female healthcare workers within 24 months of childbirth in northeastern Sichuan, China, found that postpartum depressive symptoms screened on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) fell into four statistical profiles rather than one uniform pattern. Using a threshold of 10 or more, 61.5% screened positive for clinically relevant depressive symptoms, although the researchers stressed that this sample-specific screening result should not be interpreted as the prevalence of diagnosed postpartum depression. The researchers used latent profile analysis to examine the 10 individual EPDS item scores.
The resulting four-profile solution separated participants into a low-symptom profile, a profile marked by diminished positive affect, a profile with prominent self-blame and sleep disturbance, and a profile combining high symptoms with elevated self-harm-related thoughts. Because latent profile analysis identifies statistical groupings, the profiles describe patterns within this survey rather than established clinical categories. The low-symptom profile was the largest, containing 427 participants, or 42.2% of the sample.
A further 203 workers, representing 20.1%, were assigned to the diminished-positive-affect profile. The self-blame and sleep-disturbance profile included 260 participants, or 25.7%, while 122 workers, or 12.1%, were placed in the high-symptom profile with elevated self-harm-related thoughts. Together, the three profiles beyond the low-symptom group accounted for 57.9% of participants.
The model’s entropy was 0.845, and average posterior probabilities for the profiles ranged from 0.869 to 0.945. Multinomial logistic regression was then used to examine whether sociodemographic, occupational, familial and psychological factors were associated with profile membership. Candidate factors were selected using unadjusted omnibus between-profile tests with P values below 0.05.
After false discovery rate correction, two factors remained associated with profile membership: career motivation and participants’ reports of a history of depression in their mother. These were statistical associations in the model, not evidence that either factor caused a symptom profile. The analysis therefore links occupational and family-related characteristics to differences in profile membership without establishing a direction of effect or temporal sequence.
The results show that total EPDS screening results can conceal variation in symptom composition among women in this occupational sample. Some participants had comparatively low symptom levels, whereas others showed reduced positive affect, pronounced self-blame and disturbed sleep, or a broader high-symptom pattern that included elevated self-harm-related thoughts. Several features limit the findings.
The anonymous online survey was cross-sectional, so it could not establish whether symptoms or associated factors changed over time or whether the profiles persisted after childbirth. Participants were at different stages within the 24-month postpartum window, and the sample came from one geographic area and one occupational group. The symptom profiles and associated factors were also described as exploratory, while the 61.5% screening-positive proportion applies only to the surveyed sample and is not an estimate of diagnostic prevalence in the wider population.
Subject of Research: Latent profiles of postpartum depressive symptoms among female healthcare workers in northeastern Sichuan, China
Article Title: Psychological symptom profiles of postpartum depressive symptoms among female healthcare workers: a cross-sectional latent profile analysis
Article References: Su, L., Chen, Y., Wen, G., Tan, M., Wei, X., Wang, M., Li, F., & Ke, X. (2026). Psychological symptom profiles of postpartum depressive symptoms among female healthcare workers: a cross-sectional latent profile analysis. BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05577-0
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: 10.1186/s40359-026-05577-0
Keywords: postpartum depression, female healthcare workers, EPDS, latent profile analysis, symptom profiles, self-blame, sleep disturbance, self-harm-related thoughts, cross-sectional study, China, Psychological, symptom
Cite Scienmag News
Glenn Wilkins. (October 19, 2026). Cross-Sectional Study Identifies Four Postpartum Symptom Profiles in Healthcare Workers. Scienmag. https://scienmag.com/cross-sectional-study-identifies-four-postpartum-symptom-profiles-in-healthcare-workers/
Glenn Wilkins. "Cross-Sectional Study Identifies Four Postpartum Symptom Profiles in Healthcare Workers." Scienmag, 19 October 2026, https://scienmag.com/cross-sectional-study-identifies-four-postpartum-symptom-profiles-in-healthcare-workers/. Accessed 20 October 2026.
Glenn Wilkins. "Cross-Sectional Study Identifies Four Postpartum Symptom Profiles in Healthcare Workers." Scienmag. October 19, 2026. https://scienmag.com/cross-sectional-study-identifies-four-postpartum-symptom-profiles-in-healthcare-workers/

