In the dynamic and high-stakes environment of pediatric emergency medicine, the act of orotracheal intubation—a lifesaving procedure performed to secure the airway—remains both a critical intervention and a source of significant risk. A recent comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis led by Alsabri, Kamal, Al-Tawil, and colleagues, published in Pediatric Research in 2025, sheds pivotal light on the spectrum of adverse events (AEs) associated with pediatric orotracheal intubation. Their work synthesizes data from multiple studies, offering an unprecedented evaluation of complications that span from mild to catastrophic, ultimately aiming to influence clinical practice and healthcare administration protocols worldwide.
Orotracheal intubation in children, particularly in emergency settings, is inherently more complex than in adults due to anatomical differences, physiological variability, and limited tolerance for hypoxia. The study meticulously collates findings from a vast array of pediatric emergency departments across diverse healthcare settings, quantifying the incidence and nature of intubation-related adverse events. These AEs range from procedural complications such as esophageal intubation and hypoxemia, to longer-term sequelae including airway trauma and post-extubation stridor. This meta-analysis represents one of the most exhaustive endeavors to date, evaluating data from an international cohort to delineate patterns that may influence patient outcomes.
One of the striking revelations of the study is the relatively high frequency of hypoxemia during intubation attempts in pediatric patients. Given children’s lower oxygen reserves, even brief interruptions in ventilation can precipitate rapid desaturation. The authors emphasize that hypoxemia is not merely a transient event but a harbinger of potential neurological damage and cardiopulmonary collapse. The review underscores that meticulous preoxygenation protocols and limiting intubation attempts are paramount to minimize these deleterious episodes.
Esophageal intubation emerges as another critical adverse event prominently featured in the systematic analysis. Despite advances in airway management technology and training, inadvertent placement of the endotracheal tube in the esophagus remains distressingly common. This complication leads to ineffective ventilation, profound hypoxia, and can escalate to arrest if not promptly recognized and managed. The study advocates for reinforced training, deployment of adjunctive devices like capnography, and protocolized verification steps to mitigate this risk.
Beyond immediate intraprocedural complications, the meta-analysis draws attention to associated cardiovascular events such as bradycardia and hypotension. These hemodynamic perturbations often result from hypoxia, vagal stimulation, or pharmacologic agents used during rapid sequence intubation. The review details the need for vigilant monitoring and readiness to provide cardiovascular support, particularly in neonates and infants who are especially vulnerable to rapid deterioration during airway manipulation.
The incidence of airway trauma related to orotracheal intubation, including laryngeal edema, bleeding, and tracheal injury, is thoroughly examined. The authors postulate that repeated intubation attempts and the use of oversized tubes are contributory factors. Such trauma not only complicates immediate patient management but can lead to prolonged hospitalization and chronic complications. The findings prompt a re-evaluation of device sizing protocols and recommend the universal adoption of video laryngoscopy to reduce mechanical injury.
Alsabri et al. also spotlight the role of operator expertise, demonstrating a direct correlation between intubator experience and adverse event rates. Intubators with specialized pediatric airway training recorded fewer complications, substantiating calls for enhanced education and simulation-based preparation in pediatric airway management. The meta-analysis thus serves as compelling evidence to inform credentialing criteria and staffing models in pediatric emergency departments.
The psychosocial and systemic factors influencing adverse events are not neglected. The pressure-cooker atmosphere of emergency situations, often compounded by limited equipment availability and variable staffing, serves as fertile ground for errors. The research advocates for institutional support in the form of standardized airway algorithms, checklists, and immediate availability of rescue devices, which have been shown to improve safety outcomes in high-risk procedures.
Given the gravity and frequency of these adverse events, the study culminates with a strong appeal for healthcare systems to integrate evidence-based guidelines grounded in this meta-analytic data. Hospitals are urged to establish robust quality assurance frameworks focused on tracking intubation outcomes, identifying modifiable risk factors, and fostering continuous improvement cycles. Such systemic approaches aim to translate research insights into meaningful reductions in pediatric airway event complications.
Another layer of complexity addressed is the diversity of patient populations within pediatrics, from neonates to adolescents, each with unique airway characteristics and vulnerabilities. The meta-analysis dissects adverse event rates across these age categories, revealing distinct trends that necessitate age-specific protocols and equipment sizing. This granular perspective enhances clinical precision and promotes safer individualized care.
Furthermore, the authors explore emerging technological adjuncts such as video laryngoscopes, bougies, and novel endotracheal tube designs, scrutinizing their effectiveness in reducing AEs. The evidence synthesized identifies video laryngoscopy as a transformative tool that improves glottic visualization and success rates, particularly among less experienced intubators, thereby contributing to safer pediatric airway management.
The significance of pre-intubation assessment and optimization cannot be overstated, as highlighted in the review. Assessing factors such as airway anatomy, hemodynamic stability, and potential difficult airway markers enables better preparation and selection of intubation strategies. The study recommends incorporation of comprehensive pre-intubation checklists to systematize this critical phase and reduce surprises during the procedure.
In detailing the multifactorial causality behind intubation-related adverse events, the research team underscores the interplay between patient pathology, procedural technique, and environmental variables. This holistic viewpoint challenges healthcare providers to adopt multidisciplinary approaches involving anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, nursing staff, and respiratory therapists to collaborate effectively in airway management.
Importantly, the meta-analysis’s robust methodological approach, including rigorous literature search strategies, heterogeneity assessments, and bias evaluations, lends substantial credibility to its conclusions. Such scientific rigor ensures that its recommendations are grounded in a comprehensive and unbiased synthesis of the best available evidence, elevating their utility for policy-making and clinical guideline development.
Ultimately, this landmark study serves as a clarion call to the pediatric healthcare community, emphasizing that despite decades of advances, orotracheal intubation in children remains fraught with preventable risks. By illuminating the landscape of adverse events with unparalleled detail, Alsabri and colleagues empower practitioners and administrators alike to spearhead efforts towards safer pediatric airway management, saving both lives and resources in the process.
Subject of Research: Adverse events associated with pediatric orotracheal intubation in emergency settings.
Article Title: Adverse events in pediatric orotracheal intubation in the pediatric emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article References:
Alsabri, M., Kamal, I., Al-Tawil, M. et al. Adverse events in pediatric orotracheal intubation in the pediatric emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04142-6
Image Credits: AI Generated
