Tumors in the Same Dog Are Molecularly Worlds Apart, Landmark Study Shows

When a dog develops mammary tumors, veterinarians almost never find just one. Roughly half to sixty percent of dogs diagnosed with canine mammary tumors carry multiple, physically distinct growths at the same time, a phenomenon known as synchronous tumor development. For decades, the assumption has been that tumors arising in the same animal, sharing the same genetic background, hormones, and environment, would at least resemble one another biologically. A new transcriptomic study from Norwegian researchers dismantles that assumption with striking clarity, showing that even tumors sitting side by side within a single dog can be molecular strangers.

The study, published in the journal Veterinary Oncology, was led by Ingrid Marie Moberg and colleagues at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, and the University of Oslo. The team analyzed RNA sequencing data from 179 canine mammary tumors, drawn from a cohort of naturally occurring tumors removed from companion dogs during routine surgery. Their goal was twofold: to define molecular subgroups of canine mammary tumors without reference to histology, and then to ask whether tumors from the same dog share those molecular identities. The answer to the second question, in most cases, was no.

To classify the tumors, the researchers first reduced their high-dimensional gene expression data using principal component analysis, then applied unsupervised consensus clustering, an algorithm that groups samples based purely on expression similarity and stability across repeated resampling. This revealed five robust transcriptomic clusters. Crucially, the clusters did not map cleanly onto histological diagnosis. Each cluster contained a mixture of benign and malignant tumors, confirming that the microscopic appearance of these tumors tells only part of the story of their underlying biology.

Gene set enrichment analysis then revealed that the five clusters bear a remarkable resemblance to molecular subtypes long recognized in human breast cancer. Three of the clusters showed enrichment of hormone-related gene programs, including estrogen response, and were found to harbor the transcription factor GATA3, a classic marker of luminal breast cancer in humans. One cluster combined cell-cycle proliferation with immune and interferon signaling, evoking the aggressive basal-like or triple-negative phenotype, while a fifth cluster was defined by epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, and inflammatory modules, reminiscent of the claudin-low subtype. The parallel with human breast cancer taxonomy is not merely cosmetic; it strengthens the case for dogs as a comparative model in which the biology of mammary cancer can be studied in a spontaneously arising disease.

Beyond clustering, the team constructed a gene co-expression network using the hCoCena framework, identifying ten modules of genes that are expressed together and that encode distinct biological processes. One module captured hormone signaling, two captured immune and interferon responses, three reflected metabolism and proliferation through glycolysis, PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling, oxidative phosphorylation, and MYC targets, and others traced epithelial differentiation through WNT signaling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell-cycle regulation through E2F targets and the G2M checkpoint, and tumor microenvironment features such as angiogenesis. Transcription factor enrichment within the modules pointed to GATA3 as a regulator of the hormonal program and E2F1 as a driver of the proliferative module, providing candidate master switches behind the observed phenotypes.

The heart of the study, however, lies in its analysis of synchronous tumors. The researchers focused on 45 dogs that each carried exactly two tumors, yielding 90 paired samples classified as benign-benign, malignant-benign, or malignant-malignant. When they compared cluster assignments within each pair, concordance was low. Only about 45 percent of tumor pairs landed in the same transcriptomic cluster overall, with malignant-malignant pairs showing the highest agreement at 56 percent, benign-benign pairs at 44 percent, and mixed malignant-benign pairs at just 36 percent. In other words, the majority of dogs carried two tumors with fundamentally different molecular identities.

To quantify this divergence at the level of individual genes, the team calculated intraclass correlation coefficients for every gene across the paired samples. Genes were scored as low, moderate, or high in correlation between a dog’s two tumors. The results were unambiguous: between roughly 76 and 90 percent of genes showed low correlation across all diagnostic categories, and fewer than one percent of genes were highly correlated within any category. This pattern of widespread discordance held regardless of whether both tumors were benign, both malignant, or one of each, indicating that molecular independence between synchronous tumors is the norm rather than the exception.

A small set of exceptions proved informative. The analysis identified a handful of genes, including OMD and EN1, whose expression is strongly correlated within certain categories of synchronous tumor pairs and which have been reported as prognostic markers in human cancers. The authors suggest that these genes may point to shared disease processes or protective mechanisms against malignant transformation, and that they deserve further investigation, potentially at the DNA level, to uncover any genetic factors underlying their coordinated behavior. Meanwhile, examination of module-level variation showed that programs linked to cell-cycle activity, hormone signaling, and immune responses fluctuated most between paired tumors, while modules tied to epithelial differentiation and metabolism remained comparatively stable within individuals.

The clinical implications of this work reach in two directions at once. For veterinary medicine, the findings suggest that each tumor in a multi-tumor patient should be evaluated as a biologically independent lesion rather than assumed to be representative of its neighbors. Because molecular subtypes in human breast cancer drive dramatically different treatment decisions, from endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive disease to chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors for triple-negative tumors, a biology-driven approach could eventually refine the limited therapeutic options currently available for canine patients. The authors note, for instance, that identifying hormone-positive subtypes could inform whether ovariohysterectomy offers real benefit at the time of tumor removal, a decision veterinarians currently make without molecular guidance.

For comparative oncology, the study reinforces the value of the canine model in a way that human cohorts cannot easily replicate. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer occurs in only around one percent of human patients, whereas synchronous mammary tumors affect the majority of affected dogs. Studying these paired tumors within the same genetic background eliminates many host-specific confounders, offering a natural experiment in tumor evolution and inter-individual heterogeneity. The authors acknowledge limitations inherent to bulk RNA sequencing, which averages expression across all cells in a tissue and may reflect tissue composition as much as tumor biology, and they caution that a single RNA sample may not represent an entire tumor. Even so, their conclusion stands firm: histopathology alone does not capture the molecular reality of canine mammary tumors, and expression-based profiling offers a more faithful map of the biological terrain that clinicians and researchers alike will need to navigate.

Subject of Research: Transcriptomic heterogeneity of synchronous canine mammary tumors and their molecular resemblance to human breast cancer subtypes

Article Title: High molecular heterogeneity in synchronous canine mammary tumors detected by transcriptomic analysis

Article References: Moberg, I. M., Murphy, S. L., Hansen, N., Borge, K. S., Gunnes, G., Sørlie, T., Lingaas, F., Bergholtz, H., & Solbakken, M. H. (2026). High molecular heterogeneity in synchronous canine mammary tumors detected by transcriptomic analysis. Veterinary Oncology, 3(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44356-026-00066-3

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s44356-026-00066-3

Keywords: canine mammary tumors, transcriptomics, RNA sequencing, tumor heterogeneity, synchronous tumors, breast cancer subtypes, gene co-expression network, consensus clustering, comparative oncology, veterinary pathology, High, molecular