AI Can Write Your Paper, But It Cannot Think It For You: New Framework Maps Where the Struggle Must Stay
A new cognitive-load-based framework specifies which writing tasks AI should handle and which mental effort must remain the researcher's own.
A new cognitive-load-based framework specifies which writing tasks AI should handle and which mental effort must remain the researcher's own.
A PNAS Nexus editorial by Charles Branas and Bruce Levine proposes norms for AI in science, arguing that generative AI ...
A new study proposes that ChatGPT can serve as a peripheral, non-authorial language editor that helps non-native English-speaking researchers publish ...
Bioethicists argue that requiring researchers to submit every AI prompt and output with their manuscripts would be unenforceable, chilling, and ...
A new letter in the Annals of Biomedical Engineering argues through consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethics lenses that prompting large ...
A new study in AI & Society traces generative AI art back to the instruction-based practices of Yoko Ono and ...
A new correspondence in Academic Psychiatry argues that the psychiatric note is not mere transcription but the specialty's defining procedure, ...
A review of 40 highly cited studies finds that AI expands creative productivity while intensifying conflicts over authorship, legitimacy, and ...
Psychiatry educators warn that unfounded suspicions linking the em dash to AI-generated text are pressuring scholars to abandon their natural ...
© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine
© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine