Friday, August 29, 2025
Science
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Scienmag
No Result
View All Result
Home Science News Social Science

Study Finds Female Election Candidates Receive Fewer Retweets and Less Media Coverage

July 31, 2025
in Social Science
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
65
SHARES
593
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT

Recent research into the dynamics of UK General Elections from 2015 to 2019 reveals compelling evidence of persistent gender disparities in political engagement and media representation. Female candidates, despite often exerting greater effort and experience, consistently face obstacles in gaining equal media recognition and social media traction compared to their male counterparts. This underrepresentation not only affects their visibility but also translates into tangible electoral disadvantages, underscoring an enduring gender penalty within British politics.

A comprehensive study published in the newly released book “Media and the British General Elections of 2015–2019” meticulously examines the multifaceted interactions between traditional media, social media platforms, and electoral processes. The research dissects how coverage by newspapers — predominantly from conservative-leaning outlets — influences television news narratives, ultimately shaping public perceptions and voter behavior. This interplay accentuates the growing presidentialisation of British elections, where media focus gravitates more towards party leaders than party policies themselves.

The data underpinning this research emerges from the British Election Longitudinal News Study (BELNS), a unique and robust dataset enabling scholars to quantify not only the volume of media attention but also its tone and thematic salience. By employing advanced sentiment analysis and network modeling techniques, the researchers illuminate the mechanisms through which media gatekeeping affects political discourse and candidate success. Traditional news outlets retain substantial authority in agenda-setting, dictating which issues dominate electoral conversation even as social media offers a parallel, decentralized information flow.

One of the most striking findings pertains to gendered patterns in social media engagement. A detailed analysis of over 1,500 candidates in the 2019 election, encompassing 920 men and 587 women, reveals that female candidates outpaced their male counterparts in tweet volume. However, this increased communicative output paradoxically garnered fewer retweets, pointing to systemic disparities in audience amplification. Such disparities suggest ingrained biases within digital political communication networks, where male candidates benefit from disproportionate online visibility.

Moreover, media coverage of female candidates was less effective in fostering electoral success. Whereas male candidates seemingly convert media attention more readily into votes, women are compelled to invest significantly more resources, skill development, and campaign effort to achieve equivalent results. This phenomenon may stem from a combination of voter biases and differential media framing, which, despite its challenges, female politicians nevertheless navigate to secure electoral victories.

The study also probes the tone of media coverage across constituencies classified as safe or competitive. Interestingly, the volume of attention did not markedly differ between safe and marginal seats for either gender, debunking the notion that safe seats are systematically neglected by the press. However, subtle gender differences in sentiment emerged, with men tending to receive more favorable coverage in safe constituencies, while women gained relatively more positive tone in contested districts. This nuanced dynamic suggests that the competitive intensity of elections influences the media’s evaluative stance towards candidates in complex ways.

Further dissecting the link between media tone and electoral context, researchers identified a correlation between closely fought elections and more positive media sentiment. Such optimistic coverage surrounding competitive races may invigorate voter engagement and suggests that media framing can modulate the perceived stakes of an election. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how journalistic practices shape not only candidate fortunes but also broader political participation.

The evolving landscape of political communication is underscored by the differentiation between traditional media’s agenda-setting powers and social media’s role in message dissemination. While newspapers and broadcasters continue to dominate which issues gain prominence, social media platforms facilitate rapid, peer-to-peer circulation of political content. However, the impact of social media on diminishing the influence of partisan press remains ambiguous and temporally constrained, as evidenced by its limited effect solely in the 2017 election and only with respect to public affect towards specific leaders.

The intersection of media tone with voters’ political engagement reveals further complexities. Negative coverage of female and ethnic minority candidates was paradoxically linked to heightened political discussion, increased interest, and greater intention to participate among certain segments of the electorate. This counterintuitive effect suggests that adverse media portrayals may stimulate political activism, possibly by mobilizing solidarity or awareness among sympathetic audiences.

Collectively, these insights illuminate entrenched gender biases permeating both the traditional and new media ecosystems involved in British electoral politics. Female candidates face a double bind: they must surmount greater campaign challenges and simultaneously counter disproportionately negative or muted media representation. Yet, their ability to achieve electoral success under these conditions testifies to resilience and underscores the urgent necessity of addressing systemic inequities within political communication.

This research advances the scholarly discourse by blending sophisticated data analytics with empirical evaluation of multiple electoral cycles, revealing evolving patterns yet persistent obstacles in UK politics. It underscores the critical importance of media literacy, equitable coverage, and digital platform reforms to foster a more inclusive democratic landscape, where all candidates can compete fairly regardless of gender.

As British elections continue to evolve under the influence of social media proliferation and media consolidation, understanding the nuanced relationships among candidate characteristics, media function, and voter behavior becomes essential. This body of research provides not only diagnostic clarity but also a foundation for future initiatives aimed at mitigating gender biases and enhancing the democratic representativeness of electoral contests in Britain.


Subject of Research:
Media effects and gender disparities in UK General Elections from 2015 to 2019.

Article Title:
Media and the British General Elections of 2015–2019.

News Publication Date:
Not specified in the content.

Web References:
https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-media-and-the-british-general-elections-of-2015-2019.html

References:
Based on research by Daniel Stevens, Susan Banducci, Laszlo Horvath, Ekaterina Kolpinskaya, Kiran Arabaghatta Basavaraj, Patrick English, Hannah Bunting, Charlotte James, Iulia Cioroianu, Amanda Haraldsson.

Keywords:
Political science; Government; Political process; Sociopolitical systems; Democracy; Elections; Media influence; Gender bias; Social media; Electoral behavior; British politics; Media coverage.

Tags: British Election Longitudinal News Study insightselectoral disadvantages for women candidatesfemale candidates in UK electionsgender disparities in political media coveragegender penalty in electoral politicsmedia attention and voter behaviormedia representation in British politicsnewspaper coverage bias in politicspresidentialisation of British electionssentiment analysis in media studiessocial media engagement for women in politicstraditional media influence on elections
Share26Tweet16
Previous Post

Innovative mRNA Therapy Demonstrates Potential for Heart Regeneration Post-Heart Attack

Next Post

Lightning strikes kill 320 million trees annually, causing significant biomass loss

Related Posts

blank
Social Science

New Review Reveals Nearly 90% of Middle-Aged and Older Autistic Adults in the UK Remain Undiagnosed

August 28, 2025
blank
Social Science

Key Factors in China’s Provincial Spatial Planning

August 28, 2025
blank
Social Science

Why Sex Education Is Essential for Adolescents

August 28, 2025
blank
Social Science

Unmet Care Needs Impacting Older Adults’ Relationships

August 28, 2025
blank
Social Science

Principal-Agent Theory in Consultative Policy-Making Explored

August 28, 2025
blank
Social Science

Head Start Program: Insights Through Bibliometric Analysis

August 28, 2025
Next Post
blank

Lightning strikes kill 320 million trees annually, causing significant biomass loss

  • Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    27541 shares
    Share 11013 Tweet 6883
  • University of Seville Breaks 120-Year-Old Mystery, Revises a Key Einstein Concept

    954 shares
    Share 382 Tweet 239
  • Bee body mass, pathogens and local climate influence heat tolerance

    642 shares
    Share 257 Tweet 161
  • Researchers record first-ever images and data of a shark experiencing a boat strike

    509 shares
    Share 204 Tweet 127
  • Warm seawater speeding up melting of ‘Doomsday Glacier,’ scientists warn

    312 shares
    Share 125 Tweet 78
Science

Embark on a thrilling journey of discovery with Scienmag.com—your ultimate source for cutting-edge breakthroughs. Immerse yourself in a world where curiosity knows no limits and tomorrow’s possibilities become today’s reality!

RECENT NEWS

  • Revolutionizing Primary Care with Generative AI Solutions
  • Transplant Policies: Undocumented Immigrants vs. Tourists
  • Enhanced Outcomes with Revised Oocyte Warming Protocol
  • Completing the Loop: A 360° Journey in Biomedical Engineering

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology
  • Athmospheric
  • Biology
  • Blog
  • Bussines
  • Cancer
  • Chemistry
  • Climate
  • Earth Science
  • Marine
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Pediatry
  • Policy
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Science Education
  • Social Science
  • Space
  • Technology and Engineering

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,859 other subscribers

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Discover more from Science

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading