A groundbreaking doctoral dissertation from the University of Vaasa challenges conventional approaches to sustainable fashion, revealing that appealing to personal well-being is a far more effective motivator for reducing clothing consumption than emphasizing environmental responsibility. Essi Vesterinen’s comprehensive research in marketing explores how extending the lifespan of garments is intricately linked to enhanced subjective well-being and a healthier body image, offering a novel paradigm shift in sustainable consumer behavior.
Vesterinen’s study confronts the prevailing assumption that circular economy practices and heightened environmental awareness alone can resolve the ever-growing sustainability problem inherent in the clothing industry. The research argues that while these elements are necessary, they remain insufficient because human behavior is fundamentally driven by self-interest. Recognizing this, Vesterinen posits that motivating consumers through personal and egoistic benefits can lead to more enduring changes in consumption patterns.
The fast fashion industry perpetuates a relentless cycle of consumption by bombarding consumers with an endless stream of novel trends and marketing messages that promise happiness through new purchases. Vesterinen flips this narrative by demonstrating that the pursuit of constant novelty actually undermines well-being. Instead, she advocates for cultivating satisfaction by focusing on one’s existing wardrobe, nurturing a personal style, and consciously extending the use of clothing as a pathway to increased happiness.
Central to Vesterinen’s thesis is the idea that the contradiction in consumer messaging—between consuming more for economic prosperity and consuming less for environmental protection—creates cognitive dissonance and gridlocks meaningful behavioral change. By rooting sustainability motives in intrinsic well-being, individuals can reconcile these conflicting drives in a way that fosters genuine and lasting anti-consumption behaviors, rather than superficial or short-lived eco-friendly choices.
One of the study’s most compelling and unexpected findings is the link between prolonged garment use and improved body image. Vesterinen explains this relationship through the lens of social comparison theory: frequent exposure to new fashion trends and idealized images on social media exacerbates feelings of inadequacy and self-criticism. Conversely, a commitment to an existing wardrobe invites individuals to explore and affirm their authentic selves, reducing harmful comparisons and enhancing self-esteem through the ownership of clothes that genuinely fit and resonate with their own identity.
This research fundamentally redefines sustainable clothing consumption beyond the simplistic narrative of “buy less, waste less” by emphasizing the psychological and emotional rewards embedded in these practices. Vesterinen’s insights underline that sustainable fashion is not merely about environmental stewardship but also about nurturing self-worth and fostering mental well-being, thereby aligning personal interests with planetary health.
Moreover, the dissertation highlights significant implications for stakeholders beyond individual consumers. Educators can integrate these findings into curricula that promote mindful consumption, policymakers might craft legislation such as France’s proposed fast fashion law to regulate marketing practices and reduce environmental harm, and entrepreneurs could develop innovative business models like clothing repair and rental services that support garment longevity.
Vesterinen also voices a critical call for societal frameworks that facilitate and incentivize sustainable choices. She argues that the responsibility to foster more sustainable consumption patterns must not be left solely with individuals but requires orchestrated efforts from governments and institutions to create enabling environments where consumers can easily prioritize their own well-being alongside ecological concerns.
The fast fashion industry’s impact extends beyond environmental degradation; it exerts a profound influence on public health, particularly affecting mental health through its promotion of unrealistic beauty standards and ceaseless materialism. Vesterinen’s approach challenges this paradigm by revealing how sustainable clothing practices can serve as tools for psychological resilience and empowerment, highlighting the multidimensional benefits of anti-consumption.
Technically, the research integrates concepts from marketing psychology, consumer behavior, and sustainability science. It employs qualitative and quantitative methodologies to analyze consumer motivations, subjective well-being metrics, and body image assessments, providing a robust empirical foundation for reconceptualizing sustainability motives as self-benefit drivers rather than purely altruistic commitments.
By emphasizing the alignment of sustainable consumption with personal satisfaction, the dissertation innovatively bridges environmental science and psychology. Such interdisciplinary insight is crucial for designing effective interventions and communication strategies that resonate with the core drivers of human choice, potentially catalyzing a transformative shift toward a more sustainable fashion future.
Essi Vesterinen’s doctoral dissertation, titled Sustainable consumption does not have to be altruistic: Subjective well-being as a self-benefit driver of change towards sustainable anti-consumption of clothing, will be publicly defended at the University of Vaasa in October 2025. Her work promises to redefine sustainability discourse by situating well-being at the heart of consumption choices, highlighting new pathways for reducing the environmental footprint of fashion while nurturing psychological health.
Subject of Research: Sustainable consumption, subjective well-being, anti-consumption in clothing
Article Title: Sustainable consumption does not have to be altruistic: Subjective well-being as a self-benefit driver of change towards sustainable anti-consumption of clothing
News Publication Date: Not explicitly stated; dissertation defense scheduled for October 17, 2025
Web References:
References: University of Vaasa doctoral dissertation by Essi Vesterinen (2025)
Image Credits: University of Vaasa
Keywords: Sustainable consumption, clothing industry, fast fashion, subjective well-being, body image, anti-consumption, circular economy, consumer behavior, marketing psychology, environmental sustainability