In an era dominated by digital connectivity, the phenomenon of smartphone addiction has emerged as a pressing psychological and social dilemma. Recent research spearheaded by Şahin and Özdemir, published in BMC Psychology (2026), delves into the intricate mechanisms underlying this addiction. Their study investigates the relationship between the deep-seated human motivation known as the “quest for significance” and excessive smartphone use, proposing that a novel theoretical framework—the dual passion model—may serve as a vital mediator linking these concepts.
The quest for significance refers to an intrinsic psychological drive wherein individuals seek meaning, worth, and acknowledgment from their environment. This motivational state is paramount to human behavior, influencing actions ranging from career ambitions to social interactions. When unfulfilled, an individual’s quest for significance can trigger compensatory behaviors aimed at restoring a sense of self-worth. Şahin and Özdemir posit that smartphones, with their promise of instant social affirmation through likes, comments, and notifications, may function as an alluring tool for satisfying this elusive quest.
Central to their thesis is the dual passion model, a psychological construct that distinguishes between two types of passion—harmonious passion and obsessive passion. Harmonious passion emerges when an activity is willingly embraced and integrated into one’s identity without conflict or compulsion. In contrast, obsessive passion entails an uncontrollable urge to engage in an activity, often triggering negative emotions and impeding other life domains. This bifurcation provides a nuanced lens through which to analyze the compulsive patterns observed in smartphone addiction.
Şahin and Özdemir’s methodological approach involved a large sample of participants subjected to rigorous psychometric assessment tools that measured the intensity of their quest for significance, the quality and quantity of their passion towards smartphone use, and the prevalence of addiction symptoms. By employing advanced statistical mediation analyses, the researchers illuminated the pathways by which the quest for significance motivates smartphone engagement—either adaptively through harmonious passion or maladaptively via obsessive passion.
The results uncovered a compelling mediation effect of the dual passion model. Specifically, individuals driven by a strong quest for significance exhibited higher levels of obsessive passion for their smartphones, which in turn predicted greater degrees of addiction. This finding suggests that the compulsive use of smartphones may function as a maladaptive coping mechanism for unmet psychological needs centered on recognition and worth. Conversely, those with harmonious passion demonstrated healthier patterns of smartphone engagement, indicating potential protective factors against addiction.
Critically, these insights underscore the need to view smartphone addiction not merely as a behavioral excess but as a complex psychological phenomenon deeply interwoven with fundamental human motivations. Understanding this relationship offers promising implications for intervention strategies. Therapeutic modalities could benefit from targeting the underlying quest for significance and redirecting passion towards more constructive outlets, potentially attenuating the grip of addiction.
Moreover, the dual passion model’s application to smartphone behaviors heralds a paradigm shift in addiction research, moving beyond unidimensional explanations focused solely on external stimuli or habit formation. This model captures the dynamic and individualized nature of passion, emphasizing the quality of engagement rather than frequency alone. As such, it aligns with emerging perspectives advocating for personalized approaches in mental health treatment and digital well-being.
The study’s interdisciplinary significance extends across psychology, behavioral science, and technology design. It poses critical questions about how digital platforms shape and exploit human desires for significance. Social media companies, app developers, and policymakers may find this research pivotal in crafting ethical designs that foster harmonious passion rather than obsessive consumption, potentially mitigating the societal impact of digital addiction.
Furthermore, the research raises ethical considerations regarding the gamification elements pervasive in smartphones that intentionally trigger obsessive passion. Features such as infinite scroll, reward systems, and social comparison mechanisms are technologically engineered to maximize user engagement but inadvertently risk exacerbating psychological vulnerabilities tied to the quest for significance. Tuned interventions at both individual and systemic levels are imperative to balance technological advancement with mental health preservation.
Another profound implication lies in the differentiation between adaptive and maladaptive passion in the digital age, which could reshape public health messaging about screen time. Campaigns emphasizing balanced and purposeful technology use—anchored in harmonious passion—could resonate more effectively than those solely promoting reductionist goals like limiting hours on devices. Framing smartphone usage around the quality of engagement reframes the discourse towards empowerment and self-regulation.
Despite its strengths, the study calls for further longitudinal investigations to unpack causality and explore how passion for smartphones evolves over time under varying life circumstances. Expanding this research cross-culturally may also reveal divergent patterns shaped by sociocultural narratives around significance and technology adoption. Such knowledge could potentiate culturally sensitive interventions adaptable on a global scale.
In conclusion, Şahin and Özdemir’s pioneering work charts a sophisticated psychological terrain where identity, motivation, and technology intersect. Their elucidation of the mediating role of the dual passion model in the relationship between quest for significance and smartphone addiction offers critical insights for unraveling the complexity of digital dependence. This knowledge paves the way for innovative mental health strategies aiming to reclaim agency in an increasingly connected yet psychologically challenging world.
As society continues to grapple with the double-edged sword of technological immersion, this research spotlights the profound human yearning at the heart of addiction. Recognizing and addressing the quest for significance may be key to achieving healthier digital futures, marked not by compulsivity but by harmony in our passions.
Subject of Research: The psychological interplay between the quest for significance and smartphone addiction, mediated by the dual passion model.
Article Title: Examining the relationship between quest for significance and smartphone addiction: does the dual passion model mediate this relationship?
Article References:
Şahin, E.S., Özdemir, V. Examining the relationship between quest for significance and smartphone addiction: does the dual passion model mediate this relationship? BMC Psychol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-03994-9
Image Credits: AI Generated
