In the evolving battle against the multifaceted impacts of COVID-19, researchers have turned their attention to a puzzling phenomenon: long COVID. Characterized by lingering symptoms that persist well beyond the initial infection phase, long COVID has baffled clinicians and scientists alike. A recent systematic review sheds new light on the potential link between individuals’ psychiatric history and the likelihood of developing this syndrome, offering a crucial perspective on the intricate interplay between mental health and viral illness.
COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, emerged abruptly in late 2019 and swiftly escalated into a global pandemic, infecting millions worldwide. While a substantial portion of patients recover fully, a concerning subset experiences persistent symptoms weeks or even months after the acute phase has resolved. These symptoms, collectively termed long COVID or post-COVID syndrome, encompass a range of physical and neurological complaints, including fatigue, cognitive impairment, and respiratory difficulties. Determining risk factors for this prolonged condition remains a pressing challenge for medical researchers.
Within this context, the recently published systematic review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines and incorporating data from large databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus, embarked on a quest to clarify the association between pre-existing psychiatric conditions and the emergence of long COVID. Recognizing that psychosocial stressors can exacerbate respiratory infections, the study’s authors sought to explore whether a history of mental health disorders could predispose patients to extended symptomatology following COVID-19.
The review consolidated findings from 36 observational studies focusing on adult patients with documented long COVID symptoms. Remarkably, the data suggest that prior diagnoses of depression and anxiety stand out as significant risk factors for the persistence of COVID-related symptoms. This revelation adds a nuanced dimension to our understanding, indicating that the mental health landscape before infection might shape patients’ post-viral trajectories in profound ways.
While depression and anxiety emerged as prominent contributors, the analysis yielded mixed results regarding lifestyle factors such as smoking. Some studies posited smoking as a potential exacerbator of long COVID symptoms, yet no consensus was reached. This ambiguity underscores the complexity of disentangling the biological and behavioral factors that influence recovery, highlighting an area ripe for further investigation.
Of particular interest is the role of the psychological experience during the acute infection phase. The review highlights that patients undergoing a negative psychological experience—marked by heightened stress, fear, or emotional distress—during their initial illness are more prone to symptom persistence. This association points toward a biopsychosocial model wherein mental state interacts dynamically with biological processes, potentially influencing immune response and symptom chronicity.
Only one study included in the review explicitly addressed psychiatric symptoms during the acute COVID-19 phase and their correlation with long-term cognitive difficulties. The findings from this investigation hint that acute-phase psychiatric manifestations may be linked to sustained problems with concentration and attention, often dubbed “brain fog” by patients. Such cognitive sequelae are among the most distressing and incapacitating symptoms reported in long COVID.
The mechanisms underpinning these observed associations likely involve intricate neuroimmune pathways. Chronic stress and depression are known to modulate immune function adversely, potentially impairing viral clearance or promoting sustained inflammation. This altered immunological environment could facilitate the development of persistent symptoms, painting a biological substrate to the psychological correlations identified.
Implications of these findings extend beyond scientific curiosity; they demand a rethinking of treatment paradigms for COVID-19. Integrating mental health assessments and interventions early in the management process might prove pivotal in mitigating the risk of chronic symptoms. This approach calls for multidisciplinary collaboration between infectious disease specialists, psychiatrists, and primary care providers to address the complex needs of COVID-19 patients holistically.
Moreover, the recognition of psychological comorbidities as key risk factors aligns with broader understandings of chronic illness, where mental and physical health are inextricably linked. Such insights reinforce the importance of destigmatizing mental health conditions and advocating for comprehensive care models that encompass psychological support as a standard component in pandemic response strategies.
Despite the significant strides represented by this systematic review, knowledge gaps persist. The heterogeneity of study designs, populations, and methods to assess psychiatric histories constitutes a limitation. Furthermore, the scarcity of longitudinal studies tracking psychological symptoms from acute infection into the chronic phase hampers deeper causal inference. Future research must endeavor to standardize definitions and methodologies, enabling clearer delineation of these complex relationships.
In conclusion, this rigorous review foregrounds a compelling narrative: pre-existing depression and anxiety, along with the psychological experience during acute COVID-19 illness, potentially prime individuals for the development of long COVID. These findings open new avenues for both research and clinical practice, emphasizing the critical importance of mental health in shaping infectious disease outcomes. As the pandemic continues to evolve, integrating psychological insights into COVID-19 care may prove essential in curbing the long shadow cast by this formidable virus.
Subject of Research: The relationship between pre-existing psychiatric history and the development of long COVID syndrome.
Article Title: A systematic review to find link between past psychiatric history and development of long covid.
Article References:
Bessaguet, C., Bonilla, A., Polin, C. et al. A systematic review to find link between past psychiatric history and development of long covid. BMC Psychiatry 25, 942 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07150-2
Image Credits: AI Generated
