In recent years, the intersection of disability rights and healthcare access has emerged as a critical frontier in global health equity discussions. A transformative new study spearheaded by Hanass-Hancock, Ndlovu, Willan, and colleagues has propelled this discourse forward by focusing on the creation of a disability awareness toolkit tailored for South Africa’s health and post-gender-based violence (GBV) clinical services. This research is groundbreaking not only for its participatory, co-design methodology but also for its ambitious goal of fostering genuinely disability-inclusive and accessible healthcare environments. Their work, published in the International Journal for Equity in Health, addresses longstanding systemic gaps that impede equitable care for persons with disabilities who have experienced GBV.
At its core, the study confronts the troubling reality that persons with disabilities frequently face multifaceted barriers when seeking health services, particularly following experiences of gender-based violence. These barriers are often compounded by healthcare providers’ limited awareness and understanding of disability-specific needs. The newly developed toolkit, therefore, is more than an educational resource—it is a strategic, evidence-based intervention designed to enhance provider competency, foster empathy, and ultimately transform clinical practices to be universally accessible and inclusive.
The co-design approach adopted in this research is particularly notable as it diverges from traditional top-down policymaking. Instead, the investigators engaged a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including persons with disabilities, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and disability rights advocates, in iterative feedback loops. This participatory design ensured that the toolkit reflects lived experiences, culturally nuanced understandings, and practical realities on the ground, which significantly enhances its applicability and potential for positive impact.
Technically, the toolkit integrates comprehensive modules that cover various dimensions of disability awareness—from communication strategies tailored to specific impairments to the adaptation of clinical environments to accommodate mobility, sensory, and cognitive needs. Its content includes state-of-the-art research insights, practical guides, case studies, and reflective exercises that encourage healthcare workers to critically examine their biases and assumptions about disability. By embedding these technical and reflective components, the toolkit serves as an all-encompassing platform for systemic sensitization in clinical settings.
The context of South Africa presents unique challenges and opportunities for such a toolkit. With one of the highest prevalence rates of GBV globally and significant health disparities experienced by persons with disabilities, this research situates itself at a critical nexus of social justice, public health, and human rights. In a country where healthcare infrastructure and service quality vary widely, creating adaptable and accessible clinical interventions is both urgent and complex. The study’s findings emphasize the necessity of designing context-specific tools that can be scaled and adapted to other settings with similarly intersecting challenges.
One of the study’s pivotal findings is the identification of key structural and attitudinal barriers within health systems that undermine effective service provision. These include inadequate training of healthcare staff in disability issues, inaccessible physical infrastructures, and pervasive stigma that marginalizes disabled survivors of GBV. Through the toolkit, the authors propose systematic strategies such as continuous professional development, infrastructure audits, and the implementation of supportive policies that institutionalize inclusivity and accessibility as core health service values.
Beyond improving the immediate care experience for persons with disabilities, the toolkit also aspires to foster long-term institutional transformation. The authors envision healthcare institutions adopting the toolkit not only as a training module but as part of a holistic structural reform agenda. This vision encompasses the integration of monitoring and evaluation mechanisms that track disability inclusion outcomes and guide ongoing quality improvements in clinical practice.
This research intersects significantly with the broader global health movement toward equity and universal health coverage. It operationalizes the principle that inclusive healthcare is fundamental to achieving health for all, particularly for marginalized groups such as persons with disabilities who are often rendered invisible in mainstream health policies. The toolkit exemplifies how innovative, locally driven solutions can address complex systemic inequities and promote sustainable health access.
Technical evaluations of the toolkit during pilot implementations demonstrated improvements in healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy regarding disability-inclusive care. These empirical insights lend credibility to the authors’ claims about the toolkit’s efficacy and underscore the importance of ongoing monitoring and adaptation to ensure sustained impact. The study advocates for incorporating technology-enhanced learning to broaden the toolkit’s reach and facilitate continuous engagement among health professionals.
An additional strength of this research is its alignment with international conventions such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). By embedding human rights principles within clinical best practices, the toolkit advances legal and ethical frameworks that mandate non-discrimination and accessibility. This harmonization enhances the toolkit’s legitimacy and potential for adoption beyond South Africa, positioning it as a model for global replication.
The research team also highlights the nuanced challenges faced by women and girls with disabilities, underscoring their heightened vulnerability to GBV and systemic neglect. By tailoring content to address gender-specific dimensions of disability and violence, the toolkit fills a critical gap in both the disability and gender equity arenas. It encourages clinical services to adopt intersectional approaches that recognize and respond to the complexity of survivors’ identities and experiences.
Importantly, the toolkit’s development process revealed the need for ongoing dialogue and collaboration between disability advocacy groups and health service providers. This cross-sectoral engagement fosters mutual understanding and shared ownership of disability-inclusive goals. The researchers stress that sustainable impact requires institutional commitment and resource allocation, beyond initial training and awareness-raising efforts.
The intellectual rigor and practical relevance of this study make it a milestone contribution to health equity scholarship. By marrying technical sophistication with community engagement and rights-based framing, the authors offer a replicable blueprint for addressing entrenched disparities. Their work challenges health systems globally to rethink accessibility and inclusion as integral—not ancillary—components of quality clinical care.
As the global health community continues to grapple with the COVID-19 pandemic’s exacerbation of health inequities, this study’s insights gain even greater urgency. Persons with disabilities, already marginalized, have faced compounded vulnerabilities during crises. Tools like the disability awareness toolkit offer indispensable pathways to resilient, inclusive health services equipped to meet diverse needs in times of emergency and beyond.
In conclusion, the study by Hanass-Hancock and colleagues is a visionary and scholarly effort that breaks new ground in disability-inclusive healthcare. Its technical innovations, participatory ethos, and commitment to social justice mark a decisive step toward health systems that truly serve all members of society. As it inspires further research and policy reforms, this toolkit promises to catalyze meaningful change in South African health services and potentially worldwide.
Subject of Research: Disability-inclusive and accessible health services, post-gender-based violence clinical care in South Africa
Article Title: Co-designing the disability awareness toolkit for disability-inclusive and accessible health and post-GBV clinical services in South Africa
Article References:
Hanass-Hancock, J., Ndlovu, T., Willan, S. et al. Co-designing the disability awareness toolkit for disability-inclusive and accessible health and post-GBV clinical services in South Africa. Int J Equity Health 24, 292 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02664-3
Image Credits: AI Generated
