To evaluate whether closed-loop automated fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) control improves oxygen targeting and clinical outcomes compared with clinician-directed manual titration in preterm infants.
Amouri, M., Deeb, S., Deeb, N. et al. Automated oxygen control versus manual titration in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Perinatol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-026-02842-3
Cite Scienmag News
Harold Sullivan. (July 30, 2026). Automated oxygen control versus manual titration in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scienmag. https://scienmag.com/automated-oxygen-control-versus-manual-titration-in-preterm-infants-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/
Harold Sullivan. "Automated oxygen control versus manual titration in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Scienmag, 30 July 2026, https://scienmag.com/automated-oxygen-control-versus-manual-titration-in-preterm-infants-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed 4 September 2026.
Harold Sullivan. "Automated oxygen control versus manual titration in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis." Scienmag. July 30, 2026. https://scienmag.com/automated-oxygen-control-versus-manual-titration-in-preterm-infants-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/
