In the heart of Kenya, a groundbreaking study has unveiled the transformative impact of a gender-responsive maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) program during one of the most challenging periods in recent history—the COVID-19 pandemic. This mixed-methods research, spearheaded by Adeniyi, Ikemeri, and Mũrage, explores a nuanced intersection of gender sensitivity and health interventions, shedding light on pivotal shifts not just in health outcomes but also in the economic lives of Kenyan families affected by the pandemic’s ripple effects.
During the early waves of COVID-19, global health systems faced unprecedented strain, and vulnerable populations—especially pregnant women, newborns, and children in lower-income countries—were disproportionately impacted. This study aimed to assess how tailored interventions, specifically those structured with gender responsiveness at their core, could mitigate such adverse effects. By integrating qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, the researchers examined complex layers of health service delivery amidst disrupted medical infrastructures and socioeconomic turmoil.
The gender-responsive MNCH program focused on embedding equity-minded practices within community health outreach, prioritizing women’s empowerment, and addressing entrenched gender inequalities that often limit access to critical health services. Unlike conventional initiatives, this program adapted its strategies to specifically counter gendered barriers—such as limited decision-making autonomy for women and culturally ingrained healthcare hesitancies—thereby ensuring more comprehensive maternal and child health coverage.
Quantitative data revealed statistically significant improvements in key maternal and newborn health indicators compared to baseline measurements prior to the program’s implementation. These included an increase in skilled birth attendance rates and antenatal care visits, signaling enhanced healthcare utilization that directly benefits survival and health quality. The findings underscore the efficacy of purposeful gender-centered approaches in overcoming systemic obstacles in health access during crisis conditions.
Complementing the numerical impact, qualitative insights derived from interviews and focus group discussions offered a granular perspective on the lived experiences of women participants and frontline health workers. Many reported feeling more supported and adequately informed, which translated into greater trust in health services at a time when misinformation about COVID-19 threatened to discourage clinic visits. The voices of these stakeholders vividly illustrate how gender-sensitive programming can bolster community resilience.
Economically, the program’s influence extended beyond health parameters alone. The study documented improvements in household economic stability, attributed largely to the program’s ancillary support mechanisms, including cash transfers and livelihood support targeted at women. By reinforcing women’s financial autonomy, the initiative fostered conditions for healthier families who could better withstand the dual shocks of disease burden and economic downturns triggered by the pandemic.
This intersectional approach—attending simultaneously to health and economic dimensions through gender-responsive lenses—challenges and expands conventional public health paradigms. It highlights the necessity of revising disaster and pandemic response frameworks to accommodate the complex realities of marginalized populations, particularly in resource-limited settings. The Kenyan experience serves as an illustrative model for integrating gender as a principal axis of health program design and evaluation globally.
The mixed-methods design of the research contributes robust evidence to an often underexplored domain: the synergistic effects that gender equity interventions can have during emergencies. By triangulating statistical trends with rich qualitative narratives, the study provides a compelling argument for health policies that are not only inclusive but actively transformative in addressing inequities exposed and exacerbated by crises.
Moreover, this research invites policymakers, global health practitioners, and funding bodies to reimagine health systems resilience. Traditional notions centered on supply chain management and infrastructure investment must be complemented with socio-cultural and gender-informed strategies. The Kenyan case confirms that without embedding gender equity at the core, health interventions risk being suboptimal when tested by the shocks of pandemics or other large-scale disruptions.
Importantly, the research underscores the role of local leadership and community engagement in the success of the intervention. By collaborating closely with local organizations and health workers, the program ensured culturally appropriate messaging and interventions, fostering higher acceptance rates and sustainability prospects. This dynamic highlights the critical intersection between gender, culture, and health system responsiveness.
Sustainability is a central concern addressed by the authors, who consider the long-term implications of scaling gender-responsive MNCH programming beyond the pandemic. The positive economic outcomes suggest pathways for integrated development initiatives that synergize health and social protection policies. By empowering women economically and socially, these programs create virtuous cycles of health enhancement and poverty reduction.
This Kenyan study also poses broader questions about the design of international aid and development projects. It advocates for nuanced, context-specific interventions rather than one-size-fits-all solutions. The flexibility embedded in gender-responsive frameworks allows for adaptation to diverse cultural landscapes and evolving crisis dynamics, making them particularly suited for complex humanitarian settings.
As the global community continues to grapple with the fallout from COVID-19 and prepare for future pandemics, these findings provide invaluable insights that stress the need for inclusivity, gender equity, and mixed-methods evaluation frameworks in health programming. The Kenyan example paves the way for an era where health equity is pursued not only as an ethical imperative but also as a determinant of systemic effectiveness and economic resilience.
In summary, the study by Adeniyi and colleagues represents a decisive step forward in understanding and operationalizing gender-responsive health programs during crises. Its methodological rigor and comprehensive analyses establish a new benchmark for examining the multifaceted benefits of gender equity in health and development interventions. For countries facing similar challenges, the implications are clear: embedding gender responsiveness is not ancillary but foundational to achieving sustainable health outcomes.
This research is a poignant reminder that health crises unveil and exacerbate societal inequalities, but they also open windows of opportunity for transformative change. By aligning maternal, newborn, and child health programs with gender equity principles, Kenya’s innovative initiatives offer replicable blueprints with the potential to revolutionize health systems resilience worldwide.
As scientific inquiry moves forward, expanding this body of evidence with longitudinal studies and cross-country comparisons will be vital. The promise demonstrated here warrants investment and political will to mainstream gender-responsive frameworks, ensuring that health crises no longer perpetuate cycles of disadvantage but become catalysts for empowerment and renewal.
Subject of Research: The impact of a gender-responsive maternal, newborn, and child health program on health and economic outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kenya
Article Title: Effects of a gender-responsive maternal, newborn and child health program on health and economic outcomes during COVID-19 in Kenya: a mixed-methods study.
Article References:
Adeniyi, A., Ikemeri, J.E., Mũrage, A. et al. Effects of a gender-responsive maternal, newborn and child health program on health and economic outcomes during COVID-19 in Kenya: a mixed-methods study. Int J Equity Health 24, 242 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02579-z
Image Credits: AI Generated
