In an era defined by rapid technological transformation, understanding how older adults engage with digital environments is crucial for fostering inclusive societies. Recent research illuminates the intricate dynamics between intergenerational digital feedback and the digital social integration (DSI) of older adults, revealing a layered interaction where personal initiative surfaces as a pivotal driver. This study challenges traditional frameworks by deploying a mixed-methods approach that disentangles the distinct influences of family, community, and societal feedback on the motivation and capability of older individuals to use Age-Inclusive Platforms (AIPs).
The research underscores that not all intergenerational digital feedback bear equal weight on older adults’ digital engagement. Unlike familial or community feedback, societal feedback—often mediated by government initiatives and service enterprises—exerts the most potent influence on older adults’ motivation and digital aptitude. This finding departs from conventional wisdom privileging family as the primary support node and instead highlights institutional support as a critical catalyst for enhancing digital literacy and empowering older users to actively navigate digital spaces.
From a capability standpoint, the study reveals that younger family members, though primary caregivers, may fall short in systematically providing digital training or fostering confidence in older adults. Conversely, professional entities connected to AIPs have structured and sustained mechanisms—such as ongoing customer support—to scaffold users’ learning processes and elevate digital skills. The societal feedback, manifesting in formal policies and programming, leverages the considerable trust older adults place in government-led initiatives, especially in contexts like China, where historical and cultural factors bolster confidence in official channels.
Community-level feedback, while typically associated with daily assistance and safety concerns, appears surprisingly inadequate in stimulating older adults’ digital motivation. The research posits that community interactions often lack depth with regard to psychological and social encouragement necessary for fostering behavioral change. This finding reflects a gap in communal roles, suggesting that everyday interpersonal exchanges do not adequately address the transition toward digital engagement, thereby limiting their efficacy in promoting AIP use.
Central to this discourse is the identification of personal initiative as a linchpin linking motivation and capability to actual digital engagement. The findings show that motivation wields a more profound impact on the older adult’s proactive use of AIPs than does capability. This distinction is critical when viewed through the lens of the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior) model, which frames behavior as an interplay between these three constructs. Among older adults, higher motivation corresponds with a greater likelihood of embracing new digital lifestyles, a correlation intensified by their general preference to maintain established routines unless compelling reasons to change emerge.
Moreover, the research delves into the multifaceted nature of motivation, revealing that diverse motivational drivers can culminate in a uniform pattern of active digital behavior. This insight challenges simplistic assumptions, indicating that varied individual reasons—from practical needs to social aspirations—converge toward similar engagement outcomes. Qualitative data reinforce this assertion, highlighting how motivational narratives intertwine with the development of personal initiative.
Another novel contribution lies in parsing how personal initiative influences older adults’ sense of identity within digital societies. The study reports that personal initiative shapes social identity more substantially than it does acculturation, pointing to the nuanced way older adults integrate digital technologies into their self-conception and community belonging. This reflects an adaptive cultural stratification where generational cohorts—such as those born in the 1950s versus the 1990s—hold distinct digital cultural expressions, which older users craft uniquely as they deepen their digital experiences.
The theoretical implications of this research are significant. Integrating the COM-B model within the domain of information technology use among older populations expands the model’s applicability beyond its traditional spheres. By bridging this model with social support theory, the study offers a comprehensive explanatory framework for understanding how social feedback interrelates with digital behaviors. This fusion underscores the critical role of motivation and capability as mediated by social contexts, thus enriching behavioral theories with empirical insights specific to aging cohorts.
Furthermore, the exploration of how multiple dimensions of intergenerational digital feedback differentially impact DSI challenges established paradigms rooted in family- or community-centric models. By demonstrating the superior influence of societal-level feedback, the study advocates for reoriented strategies that harness broader institutional resources rather than relying solely on micro-level social networks. This perspective calls for a reevaluation of social integration efforts that traditionally emphasize familial connections.
On a practical level, the study offers clear directives. Governments and AIP-related enterprises emerge as pivotal actors who must collaborate across sectors to streamline older adults’ digital experiences and foster conducive environments. Policies need to evolve beyond mere inclusion toward empowerment, emphasizing agency and the maintenance of functional abilities through age-friendly design and participatory frameworks that respect older users’ preferences and capacities.
Simultaneously, the essential but complex role of family and community support is acknowledged. Instrumental assistance, emotional encouragement, and respectful engagement are highlighted as vital components in motivating older adults to overcome technological barriers. Yet, potential pitfalls such as intrinsic ageism and the demanding nature of caregiving necessitate tactful communication strategies. Community programs designed to provide systematic digital education and peer mentoring can fill existing gaps, fostering intergenerational exchange that nurtures confidence and competence.
Central to these initiatives is nurturing personal initiative among older adults, which serves as the gateway to sustained DSI. The data advocate a multidimensional approach whereby older users leverage digital feedback from family, community, and society while cultivating a growth mindset. This psychological orientation enables them to confront age-related cognitive and sensory challenges and adapt dynamically to evolving digital ecosystems.
However, the study is not without limitations. Geographical and temporal constraints in data collection limit the universal applicability of findings, suggesting a need for broader, cross-cultural investigations that encompass diverse ethnic and social backgrounds. Additionally, reliance on self-reported measures introduces potential biases, warranting integration of objective data sources in future research. The cross-sectional design also constrains understanding of causal mechanisms over time, thus longitudinal and experimental methodologies are recommended for more robust conclusions.
Moreover, the complexity of intergenerational digital feedback transcends source-based categorization alone. Future studies should consider the reciprocity and subjective perceptions of social support, as well as the dynamic interplay within these interactions. Such nuanced analyses will better capture the full spectrum of factors influencing older adults’ digital social integration.
In sum, this inquiry reframes our comprehension of how older adults navigate digital societies, foregrounding the underestimated power of societal feedback and the centrality of personal initiative. It amplifies calls for multi-sectoral collaborations and age-sensitive policy designs that together foster inclusive digital environments. As societies worldwide grapple with aging populations and digital transformations, these insights chart promising paths toward bridging digital divides and enhancing social participation through technology.
By integrating robust theoretical frameworks with granular empirical evidence, this research stands as a clarion call for stakeholders to reconceptualize approaches to digital inclusion. Its implications ripple across information systems, social policy, gerontology, and community development, emphasizing that fostering motivation and capability via layered intergenerational support is not a peripheral concern but a societal imperative. Only by harnessing these forces can we catalyze genuine digital social integration that uplifts the dignity, identity, and connectedness of older generations in the 21st century.
Subject of Research: The study investigates the relationship between intergenerational digital feedback and the digital social integration of older adults, focusing on how personal initiative mediates this relationship.
Article Title: Intergenerational digital feedback and digital social integration of older adults: an empirical study from personal initiative perspective.
Article References:
Hong, W., Liang, C., Ma, Y. et al. Intergenerational digital feedback and digital social integration of older adults: an empirical study from personal initiative perspective.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 1144 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05518-z
Image Credits: AI Generated
