In the high-pressure world of healthcare education and practice, mental health often remains a silent burden, especially among dental professionals. Recent research published in BMC Psychology sheds new light on the prevalence of stress, anxiety, and depression within this community, revealing troubling insights that resonate well beyond the dental clinic. The study, conducted by Lugassy, Naishlos, Shapinko, and colleagues, employs a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey to meticulously analyze the psychological wellbeing of both dental students and practicing dentists. The findings underscore urgent concerns about mental health challenges embedded deeply in dental education and professional practice, raising crucial questions about how the industry supports its future and current workforce.
Dental professionals operate within a unique confluence of academic rigor, clinical precision, and patient interaction, making the profession inherently stressful. The study highlights that dental students, navigating intense curricula and clinical assessments, frequently encounter elevated levels of psychological distress even before entering the workforce. Meanwhile, practitioners face ongoing occupational stressors, including long hours, high patient expectations, and the intricacies of dental procedures that demand unwavering focus. This dual-context examination allows for a comprehensive understanding of mental health trends across career stages, revealing a pervasive vulnerability that has often been overlooked.
Stress, anxiety, and depression are interrelated yet distinct phenomena, each with its own impact on cognitive function, emotional regulation, and professional performance. The researchers’ methodical approach employed validated psychometric tools to capture these facets among participants. Their data revealed that a significant proportion of dental students demonstrated moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety and depression, compounded by an academic environment that may inadvertently exacerbate these effects. Likewise, practicing dentists reported chronic occupational stress and symptoms indicative of burnout, which, if unaddressed, could impair clinical judgment and patient care quality.
One of the most striking takeaways from this work is the continuum of mental health risk from education to practice. The transition from student to clinician does not inherently alleviate psychological strain; rather, it often introduces new stressors tied to professional responsibility and the pressures of maintaining clinical excellence. The study’s findings call for systemic interventions at multiple levels—from curricular reforms aimed at fostering resilience and coping strategies among students, to workplace policies that promote mental health awareness and support for practitioners. This dual-focus is critical to cultivating a sustainable dental workforce.
The scientific rigor of the survey is noteworthy. Researchers utilized cross-sectional data collected at a single point in time but from a diverse population encompassing various demographic and career stages. This approach facilitates identifying not only the prevalence but also potential correlates of mental health issues, such as workload intensity, social support, and lifestyle factors. Although causality cannot be definitively established, the correlations provide valuable direction for targeted mental health initiatives within dental education and practice settings.
Furthermore, the study situates its findings within a broader context of healthcare professional mental health research. Dentistry, often regarded as an isolated field, shares many psychological stress dimensions with medicine and nursing, yet it also distinctively combines technical dexterity with patient-centered interaction. The authors argue persuasively for increased research and clinical attention to dental professional mental health, which has historically received less focus despite the profession’s unique challenges.
From a technical perspective, the survey design carefully balanced capturing quantitative data with preserving participant confidentiality, a crucial factor in eliciting honest responses about sensitive topics like depression and anxiety. This methodological strength enhances the reliability of the reported prevalence rates, which align with, yet at times exceed, those found in comparable studies of other healthcare professionals. The elevated levels of distress noted may partially reflect structural and cultural factors endemic to dental education systems, warranting further qualitative inquiry.
The implications of these findings extend beyond mental health diagnostics. Cognitive neuroscience reveals that chronic stress and anxiety can impair executive functions such as decision-making, problem-solving, and motor coordination—all essential capacities in dental practice. Depression may further diminish motivation and focus, triggering a vicious cycle of declining professional performance and escalating psychological distress. Recognizing this interplay invites a reimagining of dental education and practice environments as arenas where mental health and clinical competence are intimately connected.
In light of the current global spotlight on mental health, this research arrives at a pivotal moment for dentistry. Professional associations, academic institutions, and healthcare systems have begun to acknowledge the vital role of psychological wellbeing in sustaining effective care delivery. Initiatives fostering mental health literacy, peer support networks, and accessible psychological services are now seen as integral components of professional development and occupational health strategies.
The authors propose several actionable recommendations grounded in their empirical findings. For students, these include curriculum-integrated mental health education, stress management workshops, and accessible counseling services. For dentists in practice, recommendations encompass workload management, institutional support structures, and fostering work-life balance. These measures aim not only to mitigate current distress but also to build longer-term resilience and prevent burnout.
Importantly, the study also illuminates the potential stigma associated with mental health struggles among dental professionals. Cultural expectations of unwavering competence and stoicism can discourage individuals from seeking help, perpetuating silence and isolation. The authors call for cultural shifts within dental education and professional communities to normalize mental health conversations and to destigmatize help-seeking behaviors, thereby creating more supportive environments.
This comprehensive investigation also prompts reflection on the broader systemic factors contributing to mental health challenges. Educational pressures, reimbursement issues, administrative burdens, and patient demands all intersect to shape the psychological climate of dental work. Policies addressing these systemic variables, alongside individual-level interventions, may be essential in crafting sustainable solutions.
While the cross-sectional design affords important snapshots, the authors acknowledge limitations, including the inability to capture longitudinal mental health trajectories and potential self-report biases. They advocate for future longitudinal studies tracking mental health over time and evaluating the effectiveness of targeted interventions. Such research promises to deepen understanding and inform evidence-based policies in dental education and healthcare systems globally.
In sum, this study punctuates the pressing need to integrate mental health considerations into dental professional training and practice. By spotlighting the prevalence of stress, anxiety, and depression among dental students and dentists, Lugassy and colleagues galvanize an urgent call to action. Addressing these challenges not only supports individual wellbeing but also safeguards the quality and safety of dental care—a concern of paramount importance to patients and the broader healthcare ecosystem alike.
As the dental profession confronts these mental health complexities, it stands at a crossroads. Embracing systemic reforms, fostering psychological resilience, and transforming cultural attitudes could redefine the future of dentistry—making it a model for other high-stress healthcare disciplines. This research serves as a foundational step toward that transformation, enabling stakeholders to act with evidence-based insight and empathy.
Subject of Research: Analysis of stress, anxiety, and depression among dental students and dentists.
Article Title: Analysis of stress, anxiety, and depression among dental students and dentists: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey.
Article References:
Lugassy, D., Naishlos, S., Shapinko, Y. et al. Analysis of stress, anxiety, and depression among dental students and dentists: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. BMC Psychol 13, 550 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02884-w
Image Credits: AI Generated
