Friday, October 23, 2026
Science
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Scienmag
No Result
View All Result
Home Science News

Five-Marker Tissue Model Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions in Internal Validation

October 23, 2026
in Science News
Juliet Wilcox
By Juliet Wilcox Scienmag Editorial Profile - Human Genetics
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Five-Marker Tissue Model Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions in Internal Validation

Five-Marker Tissue Model Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions in Internal Validation

65
SHARES
587
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT

Researchers in China have developed a five-marker molecular model that, measured in breast tissue, separated malignant breast tumors from benign breast lesions with an internal-validation accuracy of 0.844. The study, published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, combined public genomic datasets with laboratory measurements in an independent cohort of 150 breast-lesion samples and identified two pairs of microRNAs and their target genes showing the strongest evidence of inverse expression in breast disease.

The clinical motivation is familiar to breast specialists: when imaging findings are ambiguous, such as in lesions classified as BI-RADS 4, or when radiologic and pathologic results are discordant, deciding whether a lesion is benign or malignant can be difficult. The team, comprising Xiaoyan Zhao, Xingxing Wu and Dan Zhao of Shanxi Provincial Children’s Hospital together with Hui Feng of Taiyuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, built a tissue-based molecular tool intended to complement, not replace, standard histopathological diagnosis in these challenging cases.

The researchers first mined public microRNA and messenger RNA datasets to discover and prioritize candidate inverse-expression pairs, using those datasets primarily for tumor-versus-normal discovery, while reserving the critical benign-versus-malignant question for their own independently collected tissue cohort. That cohort comprised 150 breast-lesion samples, 68 benign and 82 malignant, in which the team measured ten candidate axes using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, a laboratory technique that quantifies specific RNA molecules.

Two candidate pairs emerged with the strongest evidence of inverse expression: miR-205-5p paired with HMGB3, and miR-96-5p paired with FOXO1. The study’s contribution lies in these measured expression relationships within a diagnostic context rather than in new functional claims about the genes themselves.

To convert the molecular measurements into a diagnostic tool, the researchers developed a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, or LASSO, logistic-regression model in a training cohort. The final model retained five markers: miR-205-5p, HMGB3, miR-96-5p, FOXO1 and miR-21-5p.

The performance figures come from an internal-validation design with a notable safeguard. The model was tested in a separate internal-validation cohort without any marker reselection, coefficient refitting or threshold re-optimization, meaning it faced the validation data exactly as it left the training phase. In that validation set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, a standard summary of diagnostic discrimination, was 0.894, with a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.788 to 0.975. Accuracy reached 0.844, sensitivity 0.840 and specificity 0.850.

These numbers indicate that the model correctly identified roughly 84 percent of malignant lesions and 85 percent of benign ones in the held-out samples. In a diagnostically uncertain setting, a molecular adjunct with this level of discrimination could add confidence to clinical decisions. The authors frame the model as adjunctive throughout: it is meant to sit alongside imaging and pathology, not to replace them.

The study’s limitations are stated plainly. The validation is internal, and external validation in independent cohorts, ideally from multiple centers, as well as functional confirmation of the candidate miRNA-mRNA axes, are required before any clinical use can be considered. For now, the finding stands as a promising early step, and whether the miR-205-5p/HMGB3 and miR-96-5p/FOXO1 axes prove useful in the broader population of ambiguous breast lesions will depend on the external studies the authors themselves call for.

Subject of Research: A tissue-based inverse miRNA–mRNA diagnostic model for distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions

Article Title: Identification of candidate inverse miRNA–mRNA pairs and an internally validated tissue-based diagnostic model for benign and malignant breast lesions

Article References: Zhao, X., Feng, H., Wu, X., & Zhao, D. (2026). Identification of candidate inverse miRNA–mRNA pairs and an internally validated tissue-based diagnostic model for benign and malignant breast lesions. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 13, Article 1952773. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2026.1952773

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2026.1952773

Keywords: breast cancer, benign breast lesions, miRNA, mRNA, RT-qPCR, LASSO logistic regression, diagnostic model, miR-205-5p, HMGB3, molecular diagnostics, BI-RADS 4, Identification

Cite Scienmag News

Juliet Wilcox. (October 23, 2026). Five-Marker Tissue Model Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions in Internal Validation. Scienmag. https://scienmag.com/five-marker-tissue-model-distinguishes-benign-from-malignant-breast-lesions-in-internal-validation/

Juliet Wilcox. "Five-Marker Tissue Model Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions in Internal Validation." Scienmag, 23 October 2026, https://scienmag.com/five-marker-tissue-model-distinguishes-benign-from-malignant-breast-lesions-in-internal-validation/. Accessed 23 October 2026.

Juliet Wilcox. "Five-Marker Tissue Model Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions in Internal Validation." Scienmag. October 23, 2026. https://scienmag.com/five-marker-tissue-model-distinguishes-benign-from-malignant-breast-lesions-in-internal-validation/

Tags: benign breast lesionsbenign versus malignant breast lesionsBI-RADS 4BI-RADS 4 lesion assessmentbreast cancerbreast cancer diagnostic toolsbreast lesion tissue analysisbreast tissue molecular markersbreast tumor classification accuracydiagnostic modelgenomic data integration in breast cancerhistopathological diagnosis support toolsHMGB3identificationinternal validation of molecular modelsLASSO logistic regressionmicroRNA and gene expression profilingmicroRNA-messenger RNA inverse expressionmiR-205-5pmiRNAmolecular diagnosticsmRNART-qPCRtissue-based molecular diagnostic models
Share26Tweet16
Previous Post

Researchers Rethink Global Health Methods Through Dialogic, Non-Extractivist COVID-19 Study

Next Post

Simple Blood Count Predicts Immunotherapy Outcomes in Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients

Related Posts

Virtual screening yields two drug candidates that disable c-Myc in colorectal cancer
Chemistry

Virtual screening yields two drug candidates that disable c-Myc in colorectal cancer

October 23, 2026
Genomic Footprints of Selection Reveal Divergent Evolution in Five Italian Beef Cattle Breeds
Biology

Genomic Footprints of Selection Reveal Divergent Evolution in Five Italian Beef Cattle Breeds

October 23, 2026
Simple Blood Count Predicts Immunotherapy Outcomes in Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients
Medicine

Simple Blood Count Predicts Immunotherapy Outcomes in Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients

October 23, 2026
Researchers Rethink Global Health Methods Through Dialogic, Non-Extractivist COVID-19 Study
Medicine

Researchers Rethink Global Health Methods Through Dialogic, Non-Extractivist COVID-19 Study

October 23, 2026
Hormone Signals Steer Flower Bud Formation in Lemon, Transcriptome Study Finds
Agriculture

Hormone Signals Steer Flower Bud Formation in Lemon, Transcriptome Study Finds

October 23, 2026
Drug Combinations Compared for Kidney Cancer Recurrence Risk After Surgery
Cancer

Drug Combinations Compared for Kidney Cancer Recurrence Risk After Surgery

October 23, 2026
Next Post
Simple Blood Count Predicts Immunotherapy Outcomes in Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients

Simple Blood Count Predicts Immunotherapy Outcomes in Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients

  • Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more optimized

    Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    27656 shares
    Share 11059 Tweet 6912
  • University of Seville Breaks 120-Year-Old Mystery, Revises a Key Einstein Concept

    1061 shares
    Share 424 Tweet 265
  • Bee body mass, pathogens and local climate influence heat tolerance

    682 shares
    Share 273 Tweet 171
  • Researchers record first-ever images and data of a shark experiencing a boat strike

    546 shares
    Share 218 Tweet 137
  • Groundbreaking Clinical Trial Reveals Lubiprostone Enhances Kidney Function

    531 shares
    Share 212 Tweet 133
Science

Embark on a thrilling journey of discovery with Scienmag.com—your ultimate source for cutting-edge breakthroughs. Immerse yourself in a world where curiosity knows no limits and tomorrow’s possibilities become today’s reality!

RECENT NEWS

  • Virtual screening yields two drug candidates that disable c-Myc in colorectal cancer
  • Genomic Footprints of Selection Reveal Divergent Evolution in Five Italian Beef Cattle Breeds
  • Simple Blood Count Predicts Immunotherapy Outcomes in Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients
  • Five-Marker Tissue Model Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions in Internal Validation

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology
  • Athmospheric
  • Biology
  • Biotechnology
  • Blog
  • Bussines
  • Cancer
  • Chemistry
  • Climate
  • Earth Science
  • Editorial Policy
  • Marine
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Pediatry
  • Policy
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Science Education
  • Science News
  • Social Science
  • Space
  • Technology and Engineering

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,151 other subscribers

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Discover more from Science

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading