Cold Batteries, Warm Solution: Adaptive Pulse Heating Charges EVs in Deep Freeze Without Damage

Lithium-ion batteries have transformed transportation, but they harbor a well-known weakness that every electric vehicle driver in a cold climate has felt: when temperatures plunge, the battery simply refuses to perform. Electrolyte conductivity drops, lithium ions struggle to migrate and diffuse, and charging at subzero temperatures becomes a slow, risky affair. Worse still, forcing charge into a frozen cell can cause lithium ions to deposit as metallic dendrites on the anode surface, damaging the protective solid electrolyte interphase layer and, in the worst case, piercing the separator to trigger internal short circuits and thermal runaway. A team of researchers in China has now unveiled a preheating strategy that promises to dissolve this winter bottleneck, heating batteries rapidly from the inside while keeping them scrupulously out of the danger zone where lithium plating begins.

The new work, published in the open-access journal iScience, describes a low-frequency bidirectional pulsed current heating method that operates at frequencies of one hertz or below. The central innovation is adaptivity: rather than applying fixed pulse parameters, the system continuously adjusts the pulse currents according to the battery’s real-time state, ensuring that the anode potential never crosses the lithium-plating threshold throughout the entire heating process. The result, according to the authors, is the fastest possible heating that a given battery chemistry can safely tolerate, a genuine non-destructive approach validated on both lithium iron phosphate and nickel-cobalt-manganese cells.

To understand why this matters, it helps to consider the landscape of existing solutions. External heating methods, which rely on thermal fluids, heat pipes, or phase change materials placed outside the cell, tend to produce uneven temperature distributions and accelerate aging. Internal heating, by contrast, exploits the battery’s own internal resistance to generate Joule heat directly where it is needed, minimizing losses. Alternating current heating and mutual pulse heating, in which battery modules alternately charge and discharge one another, have both been explored extensively. Bidirectional pulsed current strategies, in which positive and negative pulses alternate to keep the state of charge nearly constant, have shown particular promise, but earlier high-frequency implementations demanded costly power electronics that limited real-world adoption.

The research team began by systematically mapping how pulse parameters influence heat generation. Using 2 ampere-hour LFP soft-pack cells placed in a temperature chamber, they varied the ratio of positive to negative pulse amplitudes from 1:1 up to 1:5 while holding the pulse period fixed at six seconds. Across both low and high states of charge, a larger amplitude ratio produced a greater temperature rise, a consequence of the fundamental relationship that heat generation scales with the square of current. They then varied the pulse period from fractions of a second up to 36 seconds and found that longer periods heated the battery more effectively, although the benefit plateaued beyond roughly ten seconds. That plateau defined their operating point: a ten-second pulse period, well within the low-frequency regime that avoids expensive high-frequency excitation hardware.

The truly distinctive element of the study is its use of three-electrode cells to police the lithium-plating boundary in real time. The researchers modified commercial cells by implanting a lithium titanate reference electrode at the center of the electrode stack, allowing them to measure the anode potential directly during operation, something impossible with conventional two-terminal cells. Through hybrid pulse power characterization tests conducted at temperatures from minus ten to twenty-five degrees Celsius and across a range of states of charge, they constructed a three-dimensional map of the maximum charging current the battery could tolerate at each condition without lithium deposition. This boundary current map became the adaptive brain of the heating algorithm, dictating the positive pulse amplitude as temperature and state of charge evolved.

The preheating experiments themselves were conducted under conditions mimicking a real electric vehicle arriving at a charger on a frigid winter day. With cells adjusted to ten percent state of charge and stabilized at minus fifteen degrees Celsius, the bidirectional pulses were applied. For the LFP cell, heating from minus fifteen to ten degrees took 2,068 seconds, an average temperature rise of 0.73 degrees Celsius per minute. Crucially, the measured anode potential, corrected against the reference electrode’s equilibrium potential of 1.565 volts versus lithium, remained above zero volts throughout the entire process, the electrochemical signature that no metallic lithium was plating onto the graphite anode at any moment.

Durability is where many preheating schemes have quietly failed, so the team subjected cells to one hundred repeated heating cycles at fixed state of charge. Because the bidirectional pulses deliver equal charge and discharge capacity within each cycle, the state of charge never drifts, allowing every cycle to begin from identical conditions. The authors note that with typical weekly charging and a three-month winter, one hundred heating cycles correspond to roughly seven years of real-world service, comparable to the lifetime of a traction battery. Capacity measurements taken before the test, after fifty cycles, and after one hundred cycles showed essentially no degradation. Post-mortem analysis sealed the case: transmission electron microscopy revealed an intact, uncracked SEI film, scanning electron microscopy showed an orderly lamellar electrode structure with no dendritic deposits, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy confirmed the elemental composition was unchanged.

To test whether the framework generalizes beyond one chemistry, the researchers repeated the entire procedure with a 1.75 ampere-hour commercial NCM811 pouch cell, independently recalibrating its lithium-plating boundary rather than simply copying LFP parameters. The results were striking. The NCM811 cell heated from minus fifteen to ten degrees in just 865.8 seconds, an average rise of 1.75 degrees Celsius per minute, nearly double the LFP rate. The reason lies in the interplay of resistance and allowable current: the NCM cell’s internal resistance is roughly half that of the LFP cell, but its lithium-plating boundary current is nearly twice as large, so its heating power, proportional to current squared times resistance, is consistently higher across all temperatures. The NCM cell likewise survived one hundred heating cycles with no measurable capacity loss and no lithium plating detected.

The physics underlying these results rewards aggressive current within safe limits. Because heat generation is proportional to the square of current, the alternating charge and discharge pulses of the bidirectional strategy allow larger amplitudes than constant-current heating would, since the alternating polarity alleviates anode polarization and prevents the anode potential from collapsing below zero volts. The authors point out an encouraging trend for the future: as battery technology improves fast-charging capability, the allowable lithium-plating boundary current grows, which in turn permits even larger pulse currents and faster heating, even as falling internal resistance reduces the Joule heating contribution per ampere.

The study is candid about its limitations. The pulse period was optimized at zero degrees and extrapolated to minus fifteen, an assumption supported but not exhaustively characterized across the full temperature range. The long-term stability of the implanted reference electrodes under repeated pulsing remains an open question, the durability test did not combine heating with subsequent fast charging, and the hardware costs and system-level energy efficiency of the required bidirectional power electronics were not quantified. Even so, the demonstration that a low-frequency, adaptive, chemistry-agnostic pulse strategy can warm frozen batteries at up to 1.75 degrees per minute without any detectable damage represents a meaningful step toward electric vehicles and stationary storage that shrug off winter. For the millions of drivers who watch their range evaporate on cold mornings, the prospect of a battery that heats itself safely and swiftly may be the most welcome news of the season.

Subject of Research: Non-destructive low-temperature pulse preheating of lithium-ion batteries

Article Title: Low-frequency non-destructive adaptive fastest pulse preheating for lithium-ion batteries

Article References: Li, C., Mao, S., Gao, M., He, M., Sun, Y., Wang, D., Han, X., Xia, C.-J., Wang, X., Lu, Y., & Gao, W. (2026). Low-frequency non-destructive adaptive fastest pulse preheating for lithium-ion batteries. iScience, 29(10), Article 117715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117715

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.117715

Keywords: lithium-ion batteries, preheating, bidirectional pulse current, lithium plating, cold climate, electric vehicles, anode potential, three-electrode cells, LFP, NCM811, fast charging, battery degradation