In an era where holistic health care increasingly acknowledges the integration of physical, psychological, and spiritual well-being, the provision of spiritual care within hospital settings remains a complex and underexplored dimension. Recent research conducted in Iranian teaching hospitals by Eftekhari, Bagheri, and Baghian sheds critical light on the multifaceted challenges involved in delivering spiritual care to patients amid clinical rigor and cultural diversity. Published in BMC Psychology, this qualitative study unearths significant barriers and offers imperative insights that could catalyze transformations in patient care frameworks globally.
Spiritual care, defined broadly as support that attends to patients’ existential, religious, and inner belief systems, is recognized for its role in enhancing coping mechanisms, emotional resilience, and overall quality of life during illness. Despite this acknowledged value, the systemic incorporation of spiritual support remains sporadic and inconsistent in many health care institutions, particularly in settings heavily focused on biomedical approaches. The Iranian teaching hospitals studied serve as a pertinent example where cultural, institutional, and professional factors intertwine, impacting the efficacy and accessibility of spiritual care.
A primary challenge identified by the researchers revolves around the ambiguity and variabilities in defining spiritual care within the hospital milieu. Health care providers often encounter difficulties in differentiating between spiritual, psychological, and religious care. This conceptual confusion is compounded by a lack of standardized training programs, resulting in sporadic competency among medical staff regarding spiritual assessment and intervention. The study emphasizes that without clear frameworks and guidelines, healthcare professionals feel ill-equipped to navigate patients’ diverse spiritual needs.
Furthermore, cultural and religious heterogeneity within the patient population introduces complexities in tailoring spiritual interventions. Iran’s rich tapestry of beliefs requires nuanced understanding and sensitive accommodation, which proves demanding in the fast-paced, protocol-driven hospital environment. Healthcare workers report discomfort and hesitation in initiating spiritual dialogues, fearing inadvertent disrespect or misinterpretation of patients’ beliefs. Consequently, spiritual care often remains superficial or neglected, depriving patients of a potentially crucial dimension of healing.
Institutional barriers also play a significant role. The teaching hospitals involved in the study primarily emphasize curative and diagnostic procedures, relegating spiritual care to an informal adjunct rather than an integral component of treatment plans. Limited time, high patient loads, and administrative priorities overshadow the perceived value of spiritual engagement. The clinicians’ relentless pressure to meet biomedical objectives frequently sidelines the exploration of existential concerns, which require time-intensive conversations usually incompatible with routine clinical workflows.
The research also identifies systemic gaps in policy and resource allocation that inhibit spiritual care. Unlike some Western healthcare systems where chaplaincy services and spiritual care teams are institutionally embedded, Iranian hospitals often lack formal structures or dedicated personnel to address spiritual needs. This absence not only impedes consistent provision but also leaves healthcare professionals uncertain about pathways or referrals for spiritual support, further deterrents in an already challenging context.
Psychosocial dynamics within clinician-patient relationships emerge as another critical layer influencing spiritual care delivery. Physicians and nurses sometimes perceive spiritual discussions as intrusive or irrelevant to medical treatment, highlighting gaps in interdisciplinary collaboration and communication. The study observes that when healthcare teams share a cohesive understanding and respect for spiritual dimensions, it fosters more holistic patient engagements. Enhancing interprofessional education and dialogue is thus essential to integrating spiritual care more seamlessly into clinical routines.
Ethical considerations are intrinsic to the delivery of spiritual care, as highlighted in the qualitative narratives. Providers grapple with maintaining professional boundaries while engaging with intimate spiritual concerns, mindful of patients’ autonomy and diverse belief systems. The potential for spiritual care to be perceived as proselytizing or coercive necessitates strict adherence to ethical guidelines, an area where current policies fall short. The researchers urge the development of clear ethical frameworks to safeguard both patients and providers in spiritual care practices.
Technological advances and digital health platforms present novel opportunities and challenges for spiritual care in hospitals. Telehealth, online counseling, and AI-driven support systems could augment access to spiritual resources, especially where in-person services are scant. However, these modalities require careful design to respect cultural sensitivities and protect privacy. The study hints at future research directions exploring how innovative technologies might bridge existing gaps while preserving the personalized essence of spiritual care.
Education and training remain pivotal for the successful implementation of spiritual care strategies. The study advocates for integrating spirituality modules into medical and nursing curricula, equipping emerging healthcare professionals with foundational knowledge and practical skills. Continuous professional development, supported by organizational leadership, can help shift hospital cultures toward embracing spirituality as a legitimate and valuable domain within healthcare delivery. Such educational initiatives would empower staff and ultimately benefit patient outcomes.
Patient perspectives, though less prominently addressed, are indispensable in shaping effective spiritual care interventions. The study’s qualitative approach reveals diverse patient narratives expressing a desire for acknowledgment of their spiritual needs, underscoring the therapeutic potential of genuine empathy and connection. Recognizing the subjective and deeply personal nature of spirituality, fostering environments that encourage patient expression without judgment remains a pressing priority for healthcare institutions.
The impact of spiritual care on clinical outcomes, while still emerging as a research frontier, holds promise for improving not only mental and emotional well-being but also physical recovery trajectories. By embracing an integrative model that harmonizes biomedical treatment with spiritual support, hospitals can achieve more comprehensive healthcare delivery. The Iranian teaching hospitals’ experiences offer a microcosm illustrating both the challenges and possibilities inherent in this integration.
In conclusion, the qualitative insights from Eftekhari and colleagues illuminate a complex interplay of cultural, institutional, educational, and ethical factors shaping spiritual care in Iranian hospital settings. Their study serves as a clarion call to healthcare stakeholders worldwide to prioritize spiritual dimensions in patient care. Policy reforms, targeted training, and interdisciplinary collaborations must converge to dismantle the existing barriers, thus enabling spiritual care to fulfill its potent role in holistic healing.
As healthcare systems evolve to accommodate the multifaceted realities of patient care, understanding and addressing the challenges outlined in this research become ever more important. The intersection of spirituality and medicine represents not just an additional care facet but a profound avenue to enrich healing experiences and patient dignity. Future research and innovations inspired by this work hold the potential to revolutionize spiritual care within and beyond Iranian teaching hospitals.
Subject of Research: Challenges in providing spiritual care to patients in Iranian teaching hospitals.
Article Title: Challenges of providing spiritual care to patients in Iranian teaching hospitals: a qualitative study.
Article References:
Eftekhari, A., Bagheri, S., & Baghian, N. Challenges of providing spiritual care to patients in Iranian teaching hospitals: a qualitative study. BMC Psychology (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04028-0
Image Credits: AI Generated
