In the swiftly evolving domain of virtual reality (VR), a groundbreaking theoretical framework has emerged, marking a significant leap in our understanding of how immersive digital environments can actively foster human well-being. Researchers Lin, Hsieh, Wang, and colleagues have meticulously analyzed three decades of empirical VR studies to unveil the VR InducE Well-being (VIEW) Model—a pioneering synthesis that demystifies the psychological mechanisms triggered by VR and their consequential impact on subjective and psychological well-being.
At the heart of the VIEW Model lies an intricate categorization of VR exposure types and the distinctive illusions they engender. The model highlights three principal VR-induced perceptual phenomena: Place Illusion (PI), Partial Self-Illusion (PSI), and Virtual Body Ownership (VBO). By harmonizing these illusions with 32 identified psychological effects, the framework intricately maps how these experiences contribute to ten dimensional facets of well-being, spanning both hedonic pleasures and eudaimonic fulfillment. This nuanced classification paves the way for a more precise understanding of how VR environments can be optimized to nurture different aspects of well-being.
The research reveals that Place Illusion, which immerses users in virtual environments ranging from natural landscapes to surreal constructs, predominantly enhances subjective well-being through feelings of relaxation, vitality, and restoration. Empirical evidence validates PI’s capacity to alleviate stress and anxiety, offering a compelling case for the therapeutic potential of VR nature simulations. These affective pathways described by PI underscore its critical role in fostering moment-to-moment positive experiences, thereby enriching overall life satisfaction.
In contrast, Partial Self-Illusion (PSI), which facilitates users’ interactive involvement within VR, emerges as a potent catalyst for psychological well-being. While PSI evidently bolsters cognitive aspects such as personal growth and self-acceptance, its influence on subjective well-being is comparatively modest. This observation indicates PSI’s primary function in nurturing deeper cognitive and self-reflective benefits, underscoring the unique affordances of interactivity in immersive digital spaces that extend beyond simple affective elicitation.
The model further underscores Virtual Body Ownership (VBO) as a transformative illusion that profoundly impacts psychological well-being by fostering empathy and supporting personal development milestones. VBO enables users to embody virtual avatars, fostering a heightened sense of identity and presence that can reduce negative affective states. This embodiment dimension is posited to induce empathetic concern, potentially opening new avenues for VR applications aimed at enhancing social connectedness and emotional regulation.
Intriguingly, despite the extensive scope of VR research, the dimension of Life Satisfaction—a cornerstone of subjective well-being—remains conspicuously underexamined within media psychology. Most VR studies focus on immediate, short-term emotional outcomes through pre-designed simulations, thereby neglecting the broader, longer-lasting constructs of life satisfaction. It is noteworthy that Life Satisfaction has found more robust attention in medical and healthcare VR contexts, where it often relates to specific health outcomes or job satisfaction, indicating future cross-disciplinary opportunities to bridge these domains.
Likewise, the Purpose in Life facet of psychological well-being receives scant attention in VR research. Capturing this element poses unique methodological challenges as it entails facilitating users’ autonomous engagement with VR content that aligns meaningfully with their self-defined goals and aspirations. The researchers advocate for longitudinal, naturalistic studies to explore how VR can serve as a tool for existential enrichment, such as embedding VR habit formation for physical activity, social integration, or civic participation, domains that require greater experimental freedom and personalization than current VR paradigms typically allow.
Recognizing the centrality of individual differences, the VIEW Model thoughtfully incorporates moderating variables such as personality traits, dispositional awe, spirituality, and gender to explain variability in well-being outcomes. For example, individuals possessing higher empathetic traits or spiritual inclinations may resonate more deeply with VR’s affective and cognitive triggers. Similarly, biological sex differences have been observed, with females reporting more intense VBO experiences, illuminating the necessity of personalized VR content to maximize well-being benefits across demographic spectra.
The theoretical strength of the VIEW Model lies in its ability to provide empirical guidelines for VR content creators and researchers, establishing a scaffold that links specific VR illusions with distinct well-being pathways. By integrating affective responses with subjective well-being and cognitive processes with psychological well-being, VIEW offers a comprehensive roadmap for deliberately crafting VR interventions that are both scientifically robust and psychologically impactful. This makes it an unprecedented tool for the systematic design of immersive experiences targeting mental health, personal growth, and societal well-being.
Looking ahead, the VIEW framework invites researchers to rigorously test several pivotal hypotheses. It predicts that Place Illusion enhances subjective well-being largely via affective routes, whereas Partial Self-Illusion and Virtual Body Ownership drive psychological well-being through cognitive mechanisms. Moreover, it suggests that VR experiences combining all three illusions synergistically produce the most profound effects on both well-being and persuasive communication, promising a new frontier for VR efficacy studies.
Despite these promising insights, the research unveils notable gaps requiring urgent scholarly attention. The predominant reliance on one-directional, pre-scripted VR experiences severely limits users’ autonomy, curbing opportunities for personalized engagement that fosters self-determination and cognitive appraisal. Drawing on motivation theories, the authors emphasize the importance of enabling freedom within VR—be it through open exploration of virtual worlds, temporal flexibility, or interactive complexities—to unlock richer well-being outcomes previously obscured by experimental constraints.
Similarly, VR research remains heavily skewed toward solitary experiences, overlooking the burgeoning arena of multi-user interaction and social VR. Real-time social communication, nonverbal cue utilization, and symmetrical versus asymmetrical interaction modalities remain poorly understood yet critically relevant for applications targeting relational well-being. As social connectivity continues to be a fundamental human need, expanding research that captures the social dynamics within VR environments represents a fertile domain for advancing well-being science.
The rapid advancement of perceptual technologies poses another formidable challenge to the VIEW Model. With devices like Apple Vision Pro pushing immersive fidelity to unprecedented heights, questions arise about how increased graphical quality, immersion, and mixed reality will influence the validity and applicability of VIEW’s predictive mechanisms. Future research must ascertain the thresholds at which sensory richness amplifies or potentially overwhelms well-being processes, safeguarding against adverse effects such as digital addiction or sensory overload, thus maintaining VR’s promise as a positive psychological tool.
While investigating VR’s effects, the number and complexity of sensory inputs—ranging from basic audio-visual stimuli to haptic and proprioceptive feedback—have emerged as critical yet understudied variables. The current scoping data encompass a wide spectrum of sensory engagement, but their precise roles remain to be systematically decoded. Designers and developers must therefore consider these sensory dimensions carefully to optimize VR applications for well-being induction, acknowledging multi-sensory integration as a key frontier in immersive experience design.
Furthermore, the article eloquently positions the VIEW Model not as a rigid doctrine but as an evolving framework that welcomes the inclusion of novel VR illusions and empirical findings. Historical technological limitations, such as the pre-head-mounted display era, naturally constrained prior embodiment techniques; yet the ongoing evolution of extended reality promises to introduce innovative modalities like time travel or invisibility illusions. The authors highlight that VIEW’s adaptability is essential to maintaining its relevance and utility in this rapidly transforming digital landscape.
Ultimately, the VIEW Model signals a new epoch where virtual reality transcends mere entertainment or simulation to become a deliberate tool for human flourishing. It crystallizes decades of research into a coherent theoretical structure, inspiring a paradigm shift in how VR’s psychological benefits are understood, designed, and harnessed. As VR user bases expand globally, this conceptual advance equips both researchers and practitioners with a blueprint to unlock the profound but intricate potential of immersive technologies to elevate well-being in diverse populations and contexts.
The meticulous scoping review underpinning VIEW—comprising 18,008 publications—serves as a testament to the robustness and comprehensive scope of this framework. This monumental effort offers a valuable knowledge foundation from which future empirical investigations can rigorously evaluate and refine the model, fostering a precise and evidence-based evolution of VR well-being science.
In conclusion, the VIEW Model not only crystallizes our current understanding of VR’s psychological impact but actively charts pathways for future inquiry. By addressing critical gaps such as user autonomy, multi-user dynamics, and perceptual enhancements, this framework defines the contours for an ambitious, interdisciplinary research agenda. Bridging technology, psychology, and humanistic inquiry, it offers a visionary vista where virtual reality becomes a meaningful catalyst for enhanced well-being—a goal as exhilarating as the immersive worlds it helps create.
Subject of Research: Virtual Reality (VR) and its mechanisms for inducing human well-being.
Article Title: Virtual Reality (VR) InducE Well-being (VIEW): a Scoping Review of VR Design, Mechanisms, and Well-being Outcomes.
Article References:
Lin, JH., Hsieh, JH., Wang, PC. et al. Virtual Reality (VR) InducE Well-being (VIEW): a Scoping Review of VR Design, Mechanisms, and Well-being Outcomes. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 1766 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06043-9
Image Credits: AI Generated
