In the fast-paced and increasingly digital world we inhabit, empathy—a fundamental human trait that underpins social cohesion and mutual understanding—has become an area of intense scientific scrutiny. Recently, a groundbreaking study conducted by Tagesson, Wallin, and Pärnamets, published in Communications Psychology, has unveiled a paradoxical effect of brief empathy interventions delivered online. This meticulously researched paper reveals that while short digital efforts can successfully decrease empathic tendencies, they surprisingly fail to produce corresponding increases. The findings, rich in nuance and scientific rigor, challenge prevailing assumptions about the effectiveness of online empathy training programs and carry profound implications not only for psychological research but also for educational, organizational, and therapeutic practices globally.
Empathy, broadly defined as the ability to understand and share the feelings of another, is crucial for fostering prosocial behavior, facilitating cooperation, and promoting psychological well-being. Traditional empathy-enhancing interventions have predominantly relied on face-to-face interactions, immersive experiences, or prolonged engagement in perspective-taking exercises. However, with the surging proliferation of digital communication tools and online platforms, researchers and practitioners alike have sought to develop brief, scalable empathy interventions that can be delivered effectively via the internet. Such interventions promise accessibility and convenience but also raise critical questions about efficacy in the absence of direct human contact.
In this context, the study by Tagesson et al. is particularly timely and insightful. Their research employed a rigorous experimental design to investigate the impact of brief online empathy interventions on participants’ empathic tendencies. By leveraging precise measurement instruments sensitive to changes in empathy, the investigators were able to detect subtle shifts in participants’ affective and cognitive empathic states following the intervention. A notable strength of the study lies in its nuanced approach, differentiating between increases and decreases in empathy and examining potential asymmetries in these effects.
One of the study’s most striking findings is the asymmetric influence of brief online interventions on empathy. Specifically, while the interventions were capable of causing a significant decrease in empathic tendencies among participants, no parallel increase was observed. This asymmetry is not merely a statistical curiosity but points to deeper psychological mechanisms that govern empathy’s modulation. The findings suggest that empathy may be more readily diminished or inhibited in certain contexts through brief digital exposure than it is enhanced, indicating a vulnerability rather than plasticity when it comes to empathy modulation online.
Methodologically, the researchers implemented a variety of validated empathy scales and experimental tasks both before and after the brief interventions. Participants were randomly assigned to either an empathy-focused online activity or a control condition. The interventions consisted of interactive tasks designed to prime empathic processing, such as perspective-taking exercises or exposure to emotionally compelling narratives. Contrary to established assumptions, the results showed an overall tendency for empathic scores to decline post-intervention in the digital context, an effect conspicuously absent in traditional or longer-term empathy programs.
The authors also critically explore potential psychological explanations for their findings. One hypothesis posits that brief digital interventions may inadvertently trigger cognitive overload or emotional fatigue, leading participants to adopt defensive mechanisms that blunt empathic engagement. Alternatively, the depersonalized nature of online interactions may reduce affective resonance and diminish motivation to engage empathically. Another possibility centers on the mismatch between participants’ expectations and the modality of delivery, which could undermine the authenticity and depth of empathic experiences elicited by the intervention.
From a broader theoretical standpoint, the research challenges canonical models of empathy development that assume linear or reciprocal changes in empathic states following exposure to targeted stimuli. Instead, the asymmetric effects highlight the complex interplay of contextual, cognitive, and affective factors in empathy regulation. This nuanced understanding could inspire a paradigm shift in empathy research, emphasizing the importance of modality, duration, and emotional authenticity in designing effective empathy interventions.
Practically, the findings carry critical implications for multiple domains. In education, where online empathy modules are increasingly incorporated into curricula to foster social-emotional learning, caution must be exercised to avoid inadvertent reductions in empathy among students. Similarly, healthcare professionals, social workers, and organizational leaders who rely on brief online empathy training to enhance interpersonal skills may need to rethink their strategies. The study advocates for more immersive, sustained, and possibly multidimensional interventions that combine digital and interpersonal elements for genuine empathic growth.
Furthermore, the research opens avenues for future inquiries into tailoring online empathy interventions for specific populations. Individual differences such as baseline empathy levels, personality traits, and digital literacy may moderate the impact of interventions. Understanding these variables could lead to personalized empathy training approaches that maximize benefits while minimizing counterproductive outcomes. Additionally, exploring different media formats—videos, virtual reality, interactive narratives—could further elucidate how medium influences empathy dynamics in digital environments.
The societal implications of this research are equally profound. In an era marked by online polarization, social fragmentation, and increasing reliance on virtual communication, fostering empathy remains a vital but challenging goal. The revelation that brief online efforts might inadvertently diminish empathy calls for a reassessment of how digital tools are leveraged to cultivate social connectedness. Rather than relying on superficial or ephemeral interventions, a more deliberate, evidence-based approach is necessary to harness technology’s potential to enhance human empathy sustainably.
Moreover, the study underscores the importance of measuring both positive and negative shifts in psychological traits following intervention, moving beyond conventional focus on just improvement. This balanced approach prevents complacency and enables early identification of unintended consequences, guiding the refinement of intervention designs. In the realm of empathy research, recognizing that empathy can decrease—and that this decrease may be more easily triggered—adds essential depth to the scientific discourse.
Importantly, Tagesson and colleagues have set a new benchmark for methodological rigor within the domain of online empathy research. Their well-controlled design, meticulous data collection, and robust statistical analysis provide confidence in the validity of their conclusions. Their work advocates for transparency and replicability in psychological intervention research, encouraging others to adopt similarly stringent standards, especially as the field embraces the rapidly evolving landscape of digital behavioral science.
In sum, this pioneering study elucidates a nuanced portrait of empathy’s malleability in the digital age. The counterintuitive finding that brief online interventions can reduce but not enhance empathic tendencies compels researchers, practitioners, and technologists alike to rethink how empathy is cultivated and measured in virtual contexts. As society grapples with the dual-edged sword of digital communication, this research serves as a timely reminder of the complexities underlying human emotion, connection, and psychological growth.
Ultimately, the path forward involves integrating these insights into the development of more sophisticated, multi-layered approaches to empathy training—ones that embrace technological innovation without sacrificing emotional authenticity or psychological integrity. By doing so, there is hope that the promise of digital empathy interventions can be realized, contributing to more compassionate, cohesive societies in an increasingly interconnected world.
Subject of Research: The effectiveness of brief online interventions on empathic tendencies and their asymmetric impact on increasing versus decreasing empathy.
Article Title: Brief empathy interventions online can decrease but not increase empathic tendencies.
Article References:
Tagesson, A., Wallin, A., & Pärnamets, P. (2025). Brief empathy interventions online can decrease but not increase empathic tendencies. Communications Psychology, 3, 157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00364-w
Image Credits: AI Generated
