Quantum materials—substances whose extraordinary characteristics emerge from the principles of quantum mechanics—have long been perceived as scientific curiosities confined to research laboratories. Yet, a select group of these materials have transcended the realm of academic fascination to become integral components in everyday technologies, including computer hard drives, television displays, and medical instrumentation. The vast majority, however, remain experimental, their potential unrealized in commercial applications. This dichotomy raises a question central to the future of material science: what distinguishes quantum materials that achieve commercial viability from those that do not?
Recently, a team of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has ventured to answer this challenging question by establishing a comprehensive evaluative framework designed not only to quantify the quantum properties of materials but also to assess their economic and environmental viability. Their pioneering study scrutinizes over 16,000 quantum materials, combining advanced computational techniques with pragmatic assessments of cost, supply chain robustness, and environmental impact. This multidimensional approach moves beyond traditional metrics, offering a holistic view that may transform how quantum materials are selected for further development and industrial scaling.
At the heart of this evaluation lies the concept of “quantum weight,” a parameter rooted in quantum physics that measures the intensity of quantum fluctuations within the electron centers of a material. Formulated on theoretical foundations laid by MIT professor Liang Fu, quantum weight serves as a quantitative index of a material’s intrinsic “quantumness.” Higher quantum weight implies more pronounced quantum mechanical effects, which often translate to enhanced or novel functionalities desired in advanced technologies. Nonetheless, the research unveiled a disconcerting trend: materials exhibiting higher quantum weight generally correspond to elevated costs and significant environmental footprints, complicating their path to commercialization.
This correlation between quantum weight and both economic expense and ecological burden is pivotal. For industry stakeholders, the feasibility of adopting new materials is strongly influenced by these factors. The researchers observed that materials with exceptional quantum properties frequently contain rare or environmentally harmful elements, leading to expensive extraction and processing methods that are difficult to scale sustainably. For scientists principally engrossed in uncovering exotic quantum phenomena, this sobering insight emphasizes the necessity of reconciling fundamental research with practical constraints.
The framework developed by the MIT team systematically integrates data reflecting mining practices, elemental availability, and supply chain resilience into a computable algorithm, thus assigning each material an environmental impact score alongside its price and quantum weight. This data-driven method identified approximately 200 quantum materials that are comparatively sustainable, suggesting promising avenues for industrial application. A meticulous refinement of this subset yielded 31 materials exhibiting an optimal balance of quantum functionality and sustainability, poised as prime candidates for experimental validation and potential technology transfer.
This approach marks a conceptual shift in quantum materials research. Mingda Li, associate professor of nuclear science and engineering and the study’s senior author, underscores the cultural divide that often separates material science from economic and environmental considerations. Traditionally, the field has emphasized the nuances of quantum physics at the expense of pragmatic factors such as cost or ecological impact, which some researchers have viewed as peripheral or subjective. Li advocates for integrating these “soft” factors into the scientific discourse, predicting that within the next decade, comprehensive assessments encompassing cost and sustainability will become standard practice in material development pipelines.
The implications of this work extend beyond academic curiosity, touching upon the future of technology itself. Topological materials—a subclass of quantum materials with unique electronic characteristics exploited in quantum computing, spintronics, and next-generation photovoltaics—featured prominently in the study. Their innate electronic robustness against defects and disorder theoretically enables revolutionary performance improvements. Yet, their synthesis and scalability have long been bottlenecked by economic and environmental constraints, a gap this new framework helps to elucidate and potentially bridge.
Experimental validation remains a critical next step. Many materials identified in the study have yet to be synthesized in a laboratory setting, posing challenges for precise evaluation of their performance characteristics and manufacturability. However, dialogue between the researchers and industry representatives has already commenced, with semiconductor companies expressing keen interest in exploring these newly spotlighted candidates. Collaborative efforts aim to experimentally characterize these promising materials, evaluating their performance metrics against the cost and sustainability benchmarks the framework has established.
Beyond electronics, the potential applications of sustainable quantum materials are vast and transformative. For instance, topological materials possess theoretical energy conversion efficiencies nearing 89 percent, far surpassing the 34 percent Shockley-Queisser limit of traditional solar cells. Their ability to harvest energy across a broad spectrum of electromagnetic waves—including thermal energy emitted by the human body—opens pathways for innovative energy harvesting technologies. This could culminate in personal devices that recharge simply through ambient body heat, revolutionizing the landscape of wearable technology and portable electronics.
This study also serves as a call to action for the materials science community. By highlighting the importance of environmental and economic factors in the material selection process, it aims to direct research efforts towards materials that not only exhibit fascinating quantum phenomena but also hold tangible promise for industrial adoption. Such a paradigm could accelerate the translation of quantum research from the laboratory bench to real-world applications, driving innovation while mitigating negative environmental consequences.
The methodology underpinning this research exemplifies the power of artificial intelligence in materials science. Leveraging machine learning algorithms developed by the MIT group, the team quantified quantum behaviors and correlated them to sustainability metrics, illustrating how computational tools can greatly enhance predictive capabilities. This AI-guided approach represents an emerging frontier in materials discovery where large datasets converge with theory to rapidly identify viable candidates, reducing the experimental burden and expediting development cycles.
In addition to its scientific contributions, the study underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration. The team comprises researchers from nuclear science, physics, electrical engineering, materials science, and chemistry, representing a convergence of expertise. Engaging with industrial partners further cements the practical orientation of this research, ensuring that theoretical breakthroughs align with real-world challenges and opportunities, a model that may well define the future of quantum materials research.
This work received support from the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy, emphasizing the growing recognition of sustainable quantum materials as a strategic priority. As research evolves, the integration of economic and environmental considerations with quantum material science is poised to reshape the trajectory of technological innovation, enabling a future where the exotic meets the practical, and quantum advances enrich society sustainably.
Subject of Research: Quantum materials, evaluation of economic and environmental sustainability of quantum materials.
Article Title: “Are quantum materials economically and environmentally sustainable?”
Web References: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2025.09.014
Keywords: Quantum mechanics, Quantum dynamics, Quantum computing, Computational science, Materials science, Materials engineering, Superconductivity, Electrical properties