Sunday, September 28, 2025
Science
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Scienmag
No Result
View All Result
Home Science News Bussines

Under stress, an observer is more likely to help the victim than to punish the perpetrator

May 16, 2024
in Bussines
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Under stress, an observer is more likely to help the victim than to punish the perpetrator
66
SHARES
600
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT

Being stressed while witnessing injustice may push your brain towards altruism, according to a study published on May 14th in the open-access journal PLOS Biology by Huagen Wang from Beijing Normal University, China, and colleagues.

Under stress, an observer is more likely to help the victim than to punish the perpetrator

Credit: Huagen Wang (CC-BY 4.0,

Being stressed while witnessing injustice may push your brain towards altruism, according to a study published on May 14th in the open-access journal PLOS Biology by Huagen Wang from Beijing Normal University, China, and colleagues.

It takes more cognitive effort to punish others than it does to help them. Studies show that when witnessing an act of injustice while stressed, people tend to behave selflessly, preferring to help the victim than to punish the offender. This aligns with theories proposing that distinct brain networks drive intuitive, fast decisions and deliberate, slow decisions, but precisely how a bystander’s brain makes the trade-off between helping and punishing others in stressful situations is unclear.

To better understand the neural processes driving third-party intervention in the face of injustice, Wang and colleagues recruited 52 participants to complete a simulated third-party intervention task in an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) scanner, where they watched someone decide how to distribute an endowment of cash between themself and another character, who had to passively accept the proposal. The participant then decided whether to take money away from the first character, or give money to the second. Roughly half of these participants submerged their hands in ice water for three minutes right before starting the task to induce stress.

Acute stress affected decision-making in extremely unfair situations, where the participant witnessed someone keep the vast majority of the cash they were supposed to split with someone else. The researchers observed higher dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activation—a brain region typically linked to mentalizing and decision-making—when stressed participants chose to punish an offender. Computational modeling revealed that acute stress reduces bias towards punishment, raising the likelihood that someone will help a victim instead.

The authors state that their findings suggest that punishing others requires more deliberation, cognitive control, and reliance on calculations than helping a victim. These results align with a growing body of evidence suggesting that stressed individuals tend to act more cooperatively and generously, perhaps because people devote more of their cognitive resources towards deciding how to help the victim, rather than punishing the offender.

The authors add, “Acute stress shifts third-party intervention from punishing the perpetrator to helping the victim.”

#####

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available paper in PLOS Biology:

Citation: Wang H, Wu X, Xu J, Zhu R, Zhang S, Xu Z, et al. (2024) Acute stress during witnessing injustice shifts third-party interventions from punishing the perpetrator to helping the victim. PLoS Biol 22(4): e3002195.

 

Author Countries: China

 

Funding: The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (https://www.nsfc.gov.cn/english/site_1/index.html, 32271092 to CL and 32130045 to SQ), Major Project of National Social Science Foundation ( , 19ZDA363 to CL) and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission ( , Z151100003915122 to CL). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.



Journal

PLoS Biology

DOI

10.1371/journal.pbio.3002195

Method of Research

Experimental study

Subject of Research

People

COI Statement

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Share26Tweet17
Previous Post

Ochsner Health highlights innovative non-opioid pain therapy candidate publication

Next Post

NRG Oncology announces new leadership of three committees

Related Posts

blank
Bussines

Evaluating Benefit-Risk Reporting in FDA-Cleared AI-Enabled Medical Devices

September 26, 2025
blank
Bussines

Survey Finds 60% of Shoppers Reduce or Avoid Beef Consumption Amid Rising Prices

September 25, 2025
blank
Bussines

Robot or Human? It Depends on the Situation, Large Study Reveals

September 25, 2025
blank
Bussines

Fraud protection system mistakenly flags thousands of innocent banking customers

September 25, 2025
blank
Bussines

Funding research for a cause? Don’t chase the wrong leads.

September 24, 2025
blank
Bussines

Widespread UK Public Backing for Stricter Regulations on Advertising High-Carbon Products and Services

September 24, 2025
Next Post
NRG Oncology announces new leadership of three committees

NRG Oncology announces new leadership of three committees

  • Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    27560 shares
    Share 11021 Tweet 6888
  • University of Seville Breaks 120-Year-Old Mystery, Revises a Key Einstein Concept

    969 shares
    Share 388 Tweet 242
  • Bee body mass, pathogens and local climate influence heat tolerance

    646 shares
    Share 258 Tweet 162
  • Researchers record first-ever images and data of a shark experiencing a boat strike

    512 shares
    Share 205 Tweet 128
  • Groundbreaking Clinical Trial Reveals Lubiprostone Enhances Kidney Function

    471 shares
    Share 188 Tweet 118
Science

Embark on a thrilling journey of discovery with Scienmag.com—your ultimate source for cutting-edge breakthroughs. Immerse yourself in a world where curiosity knows no limits and tomorrow’s possibilities become today’s reality!

RECENT NEWS

  • Choosing Schools: Middle-Class Indian Perspectives Examined
  • Assessing China’s Energy System: Stability and Trends
  • Orogeny Fuels Spider Family Diversification in Asia
  • Breast Cancer Progression: Evolving Microenvironments and Patterns

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology
  • Athmospheric
  • Biology
  • Blog
  • Bussines
  • Cancer
  • Chemistry
  • Climate
  • Earth Science
  • Marine
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Pediatry
  • Policy
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Science Education
  • Social Science
  • Space
  • Technology and Engineering

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Success! An email was just sent to confirm your subscription. Please find the email now and click 'Confirm Follow' to start subscribing.

Join 5,184 other subscribers

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine