In the ever-evolving field of geotechnical engineering, accurate prediction of soil properties remains a cornerstone for safe and cost-effective construction practices. A groundbreaking study now emerges from the heart of Turkey, promising to redefine how engineers estimate shear wave velocity—a critical parameter in assessing soil stiffness and dynamic site response. Researchers Kayabaşı, Bayar, and Bayar explore the subtle yet powerful correlation between traditional field tests and seismic velocities, unveiling insights with potentially global ramifications for earthquake engineering and subsurface investigations.
Shear wave velocity (Vs) is a fundamental soil parameter that characterizes the speed at which shear waves propagate through the ground. These waves are essential in understanding site response to seismic events, influencing building codes and infrastructure resilience. However, direct measurement of Vs often requires sophisticated equipment such as seismic refraction or downhole testing, which can be expensive and time-consuming. The study presents an innovative methodology to predict Vs values using more accessible and conventional in situ tests, namely the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Menard Pressuremeter Test (PMT).
The Standard Penetration Test has been a mainstay in geotechnical investigations, providing relative resistance of soils through a simple drop hammer and sampler mechanism. Despite its widespread use, SPT results are sometimes criticized for their variability and indirect relationship with dynamic soil properties. Conversely, the Menard Pressuremeter Test offers a direct measurement of soil stiffness by inflating a cylindrical probe within a borehole to exert pressure against the surrounding soil. By combining data from these two tests, the researchers hypothesized that a robust empirical model could be developed for Vs prediction, integrating the practical advantages of both methods.
Focusing on the Eskişehir region of Turkey, an area characterized by diverse soil strata and seismic vulnerability, the team collected an extensive dataset comprising SPT blow counts and PMT readings alongside Vs measurements obtained via seismic crosshole tests. This multi-parameter approach allowed a detailed comparison and validation framework, ensuring that derived correlations would hold within the complex subsurface conditions typical of the region. The geological complexity of Eskişehir provides an ideal natural laboratory to test the universality and adaptability of the proposed predictive model.
The study’s analytical framework relied on statistical regression techniques to correlate Vs with both SPT-N values and Menard modulus data. The researchers meticulously filtered and normalized the datasets to mitigate anomalies stemming from experimental inconsistencies such as equipment calibration, operator influence, and soil heterogeneity. The result was a set of equations capable of estimating Vs with remarkable accuracy, bridging the gap between conventional geotechnical testing and advanced dynamic soil characterization.
Beyond mathematical correlations, the implications of the research are far-reaching. Engineers can now leverage existing geotechnical data to estimate Vs without resorting to costly and logistically challenging seismic fieldwork. This efficiency can translate to accelerated project timelines and budget savings, especially in regions where seismic risk assessments are vital but geophysical resources are limited. Moreover, the predictive models allow for adaptive planning in earthquake-prone zones by offering rapid insights into site dynamics.
A key breakthrough highlighted in the paper is the enhanced reliability achieved by integrating PMT results with SPT data. The Menard Pressuremeter provides a more nuanced picture of soil stiffness, especially in cohesive soils where SPT data alone may be misleading. Their hybrid approach effectively compensates for the known limitations of each test, creating a synergistic prediction framework. This nuanced understanding fortifies the engineering decisions made during preliminary site assessments.
Importantly, the research underscores the role of regional calibration. While the presented correlations perform robustly in the Eskişehir setting, the authors acknowledge that local soil conditions and stratigraphy can affect the model’s applicability elsewhere. Thus, applying this methodology in other seismic zones would require site-specific calibration, integrating local test results to refine predictive accuracy. This caution ensures that practitioners maintain rigorous standards even while adopting streamlined processes.
The methodology also highlights the evolving landscape of geotechnical site investigation, where traditional mechanical tests are being reimagined through the lens of modern analytical techniques. By coupling simple dynamic tests with pressuremeter data, engineers can harness a deeper physical understanding of subsurface conditions. This evolution is emblematic of a broader movement towards optimizing geophysical characterization for sustainable infrastructural development.
Furthermore, the Eskişehir case study exemplifies how regional geological features influence test results. The city’s complex depositional environment, comprising alluvial deposits and volcanic ash layers, imposes challenges for direct measurement of soil dynamic properties. The study’s success in navigating these complexities points to the robustness of the combined SPT-PMT predictive model, inspiring confidence in its practical deployment across similar geotechnical contexts worldwide.
The researchers also discuss the potential integration of their predictive equations into seismic hazard assessment workflows. Shear wave velocity is a pivotal input in ground motion modeling and soil amplification calculations. By improving the accessibility and reliability of Vs data, this approach could enhance earthquake resilience strategies, from urban planning to retrofitting existing infrastructure. The ability to predict Vs quickly could transform the geotechnical landscape by affording engineers critical risk metrics early in the design process.
Moreover, this research adds to the growing discourse on cost-effective geotechnical investigations, particularly in developing regions where resource constraints often restrict comprehensive testing campaigns. The approach fosters democratic access to key geotechnical parameters by reducing dependency on specialized seismic equipment. This democratization aligns with global goals of sustainable development and disaster risk reduction.
The empirical formulas derived during this study show impressive statistical validity, boasting high coefficients of determination and low prediction errors. This quantitative foundation instills significant confidence among geotechnical practitioners considering the adoption of such techniques in their routine workflows. Notably, the study provides clear guidance on applying these models, emphasizing the importance of proper test execution and data interpretation to preserve predictive integrity.
While promising, the authors call for further research to expand the method’s applicability. Future studies may explore incorporating additional parameters such as soil moisture content, plasticity indices, and broader pressuremeter configurations. These extensions can unveil multi-dimensional predictive models, fostering more comprehensive dynamic soil characterizations that can adapt to diverse geological settings.
The publication of this study in Environmental Earth Sciences positions it at the intersection of geotechnical engineering and earth science, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of modern soil dynamics research. As global urbanization accelerates, understanding and predicting subsurface behavior under dynamic loads becomes ever more critical. This study contributes a valuable piece to that puzzle by enhancing the toolbox available to engineers facing seismic challenges.
In summary, Kayabaşı, Bayar, and Bayar’s research offers a compelling vision for the future of soil dynamic property estimation. By smartly leveraging the strengths of the Standard Penetration Test and the Menard Pressuremeter Test, their methodology unlocks new pathways for efficient, accurate, and economically feasible site characterization. This advancement is poised to influence geotechnical practice not only in Turkey but across seismic regions worldwide.
Their work reminds us that innovation often lies in the intelligent integration of existing techniques rather than the invention of entirely new ones. As the engineering community grapples with mounting risks from natural hazards, such pragmatic yet scientifically rigorous approaches will prove indispensable in building resilient societies.
Subject of Research: Prediction of shear wave velocity using Standard Penetration Test and Menard Pressuremeter Test in geotechnical engineering.
Article Title: Prediction of shear wave velocity with standard penetration test and Menard pressuremeter test: The Eskişehir (Turkey) case.
Article References:
Kayabaşı, A., Bayar, I.U. & Bayar, M.M. Prediction of shear wave velocity with standard penetration test and Menard pressuremeter test: The Eskişehir (Turkey) case.
Environ Earth Sci 84, 451 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12449-0
Image Credits: AI Generated
