In recent years, Lebanon has become a focal point for researchers aiming to understand human resilience amid compounded social, economic, and health crises. A groundbreaking study published in BMC Psychology sheds new light on the psychological resilience of a particularly vulnerable group—pregnant Lebanese women—exposed to the relentless convergence of national turmoil and global challenges. This research, authored by Bizri, Sharafeddin, Fahs, and colleagues, goes far beyond surface-level observations, delving into the intricate, multifaceted factors that influence the ability of expectant mothers to adapt and thrive despite overwhelming adversity.
The Lebanese context is unique in its recent history of overlapping crises: economic collapse, political instability, the aftermath of the Beirut port explosion, and the ongoing repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Such layers of turmoil have disproportionately affected vulnerable populations, especially pregnant women, whose physical and psychological wellbeing directly impact future generations. This study incisively explores how these intersecting pressures interplay with individual and communal resilience, framing a comprehensive picture that has critical implications for public health strategy and psychological intervention.
Central to the researchers’ work is the concept of resilience—not merely as a static trait, but as a dynamic process encompassing psychological, social, and environmental dimensions. Through meticulous qualitative and quantitative methods, the study quantifies resilience metrics and correlates them with a variety of contextual factors, including socio-economic status, access to healthcare, familial support networks, and exposure to traumatic events. The objective is to understand which elements bolster resilience and which erode it under the strain of enduring crises.
One of the core findings highlights the significant role of social support systems. The study reveals that pregnant women embedded in strong, cohesive social networks exhibit markedly higher resilience levels, demonstrating better coping mechanisms against stress and anxiety. Conversely, the disintegration of social ties—often an unfortunate consequence of prolonged economic hardship and displacement—correlates strongly with increased psychological vulnerability. This insight underscores the critical need for community-centered policies and interventions to reinforce social bonds and collective coping strategies.
Economic instability emerges as another powerful determinant of resilience in the study. Lebanon’s currency devaluation and soaring inflation rates have drastically reduced the average household’s purchasing power, resulting in food insecurity, limited access to prenatal care, and increased mental health strain. The research emphasizes how economic hardship engenders chronic stress responses, compromising pregnant women’s ability to manage daily challenges and maintain psychological equilibrium. These factors collectively influence pregnancy outcomes and long-term maternal and child health, elucidating the urgent necessity for socio-economic assistance programs tailored to expectant mothers.
Furthermore, the study explores the psychological impact of direct exposure to traumatic events, including the Beirut port explosion and persistent political violence. The researchers document a spectrum of trauma-related symptoms, demonstrating amplified PTSD prevalence and anxiety disorders among the cohort. However, intriguingly, the study also identifies certain psychological constructs—such as optimism, self-efficacy, and cognitive flexibility—that mediate trauma’s adverse effects, fostering resilience despite external chaos. This finding opens new avenues for targeted mental health therapies that augment these specific cognitive resources.
Another notable contribution of this research is its innovative method of integrating biological and psychological markers to assess resilience. In a pioneering approach, the team incorporates stress hormone profiling alongside psychometric scales, allowing for a nuanced understanding of resilience mechanisms at the neurobiological level. The interplay between cortisol levels, inflammatory markers, and self-reported stress provides robust evidence of the physiological embodiment of psychological resilience or its absence. Such insights are especially valuable for designing holistic interventions that address both mind and body.
The intersectionality of gender and pregnancy with crisis exposure forms a poignant theme throughout the work. The authors argue that pregnant women, due to unique hormonal and psychological changes, experience resilience and vulnerability differently than the general population. The research uncovers specific stressors—such as fears about fetal wellbeing, disruptions in prenatal healthcare services, and stigma—that uniquely affect this group, necessitating specialized support frameworks. This nuanced understanding challenges one-size-fits-all resilience models and calls for gender-responsive research and policy design.
Importantly, the study situates its findings within the broader global discourse on resilience in conflict zones and fragile states. By focusing on Lebanon, the research contributes empirical data that inform comparative analyses with other settings experiencing multi-dimensional crises, such as Syria, Yemen, and Venezuela. The commonalities and divergences elucidated help refine theoretical models of human resilience, emphasizing the balance between universal psychological processes and culturally specific expressions of adaptability.
The policy implications arising from this research are both urgent and multifaceted. The authors advocate for integrated healthcare models that prioritize mental health screening and psychosocial support as routine components of prenatal care. They also call for socioeconomic interventions aimed at mitigating poverty-induced stress and ensuring food security for pregnant women. Crucially, the study stresses the importance of reinforcing community institutions—religious groups, local NGOs, and extended families—that serve as resilience reservoirs in times of crisis.
Technologically, the research leverages cutting-edge data analytics and machine learning models to identify predictive resilience patterns. By analyzing large datasets encompassing demographic, psychological, and biochemical indicators, the research team developed predictive algorithms that could foresee at-risk individuals with remarkable accuracy. These tools have the potential for implementation in real-time monitoring systems within clinical settings, enhancing early intervention capabilities and optimizing resource allocation.
In addition to its technical rigor, the study employs a compassionate ethical framework, prioritizing the voices and experiences of the pregnant women themselves. Through in-depth interviews and participatory research methods, the study captures the lived realities of resilience, providing qualitative richness to complement the quantitative data. This human-centered approach not only elevates the validity of the findings but also amplifies the agency of marginalized populations, empowering them within the scientific narrative.
The limitations acknowledged by the researchers include challenges inherent to data collection during ongoing crises, such as participant attrition and potential reporting bias. Nevertheless, the methodological triangulation and longitudinal design help mitigate these issues, enhancing confidence in the conclusions drawn. The authors emphasize the necessity for continued research, particularly longitudinal follow-ups to assess long-term resilience trajectories and offspring developmental outcomes.
This seminal study’s impact extends beyond academia, holding promise for informing international aid strategies and humanitarian programming in Lebanon and comparable regions. By illuminating the complex tapestry of factors influencing resilience in pregnant women amid compounded crises, it offers a scientifically grounded roadmap for improving maternal and child health outcomes through holistic, culturally sensitive approaches.
As global attention increasingly shifts toward mental health and resilience as cornerstones of public health, this research stands as a critical beacon, demonstrating that even in the darkest contexts, human adaptability persists. The findings call for a paradigm shift, ensuring that resilience is not merely understood as surviving adversity but actively supported through evidence-based, interdisciplinary interventions that honor the resilience inherent within communities.
In summary, the research by Bizri and colleagues represents a pioneering integration of psychological science, socio-economic analysis, and neurobiology, setting a new standard for resilience studies in conflict-affected populations. Its comprehensive, data-driven insights into the factors that enable pregnant Lebanese women to withstand overlapping crises will undoubtedly catalyze future research and policy advances aimed at safeguarding the health and dignity of mothers and their children worldwide.
Subject of Research: Psychological resilience in pregnant Lebanese women facing compounded socio-economic, political, and health crises.
Article Title: Factors affecting resilience in pregnant Lebanese women exposed to overlapping crises.
Article References:
Bizri, M., Sharafeddin, S.F., Fahs, D. et al. Factors affecting resilience in pregnant Lebanese women exposed to overlapping crises. BMC Psychol 13, 579 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02805-x
Image Credits: AI Generated
