In a groundbreaking new study published in BMC Psychology, researchers have embarked on a comprehensive exploration of Palestinian students’ attitudes toward the deeply entrenched and controversial phenomenon of honor killings. This quantitative, cross-sectional study offers an unprecedented window into the perceptions and beliefs held by young Palestinians—a demographic critical to the future socio-cultural landscape of the region. The findings shed light not only on prevailing social norms but also on the potential for attitudinal shifts that could influence long-term efforts to combat honor-related violence.
Honor killings, a type of gender-based violence where a family member is killed by relatives for allegedly bringing shame or dishonor to the family, remains a pervasive issue in numerous societies worldwide, including parts of the Middle East. Despite global condemnation, the practice persists, often justified by cultural, religious, or traditional narratives. This study strategically focuses on students because they represent a population whose evolving attitudes can signal future social change or reinforce enduring traditions.
Utilizing rigorous survey methodologies, the research employed a cross-sectional design, enabling the examination of attitudes at a specific point in time across a diverse student population in Palestine. Quantitative instruments measured myriad dimensions of belief, including the perceived legitimacy of honor killings, the factors that justify or delegitimize such acts, and the relationship between demographic variables and attitudinal variance. The data collection process was carefully designed to ensure anonymity and reduce response bias, which is crucial when dealing with such delicate and potentially stigmatizing issues.
One of the core findings reveals a complex interplay between gender, education level, and religiosity in shaping attitudes. Male students demonstrated a higher tendency to rationalize honor killings under certain circumstances compared to their female counterparts. This gender discrepancy is significant because it reflects deep-rooted patriarchal values where male authority and family honor are culturally intertwined. Female students, meanwhile, generally expressed stronger opposition, signaling a possible generational and gender-based shift in attitudes that could fuel resistance to honor-based violence in coming years.
Furthermore, the study highlights the influential role of educational attainment. Students enrolled in higher levels of education, or in programs emphasizing human rights and social sciences, were more likely to reject the legitimacy of honor killings outright. This trend underscores the transformative power of education in challenging traditional norms and fostering critical perspectives. Education emerges as not just an individual empowerment tool but also a societal lever for change.
The religious dimension adds further complexity. Participants’ interpretations of religious teachings were not monolithic, with some endorsing honor killings under the guise of maintaining family sanctity, while others explicitly condemned such violence as incompatible with true religious values. This divergence within the same faith community illustrates how religious texts and their interpretations can be mobilized both to justify and to critique harmful practices. The study thus calls for nuanced, culturally sensitive interventions that can clarify religious doctrine and dismantle harmful misinterpretations.
Importantly, the researchers contextualized their findings within the broader Palestinian socio-political environment, characterized by political instability, economic hardship, and social upheaval. These stressors may exacerbate traditionalist attitudes and reinforce patriarchal authority as mechanisms for social cohesion and control. The interplay between macro-level conflict and micro-level social attitudes points to the necessity of addressing systemic issues in tandem with behavioral change campaigns.
From a methodological perspective, the study sets a new standard for empirical research on honor killings by using robust statistical analyses to identify significant predictors of attitudes and by employing sampling techniques that ensure demographic representation. The use of validated scales to assess attitude toward gender-based violence strengthens the internal validity of findings and enables comparison with analogous studies in other cultural contexts.
The implications of this research are profound. First, it provides a data-driven foundation for policymakers, educators, and activists seeking to design evidence-based interventions aimed at eradicating honor killings. Understanding the nuanced positions of youth helps tailor messages and programs that resonate with their lived realities. For example, leveraging educational curricula to foster critical thinking about gender norms and human rights can be a potent preventative strategy.
Second, the study highlights the potential for shifts in social norms within Palestinian society. While honor killings are upheld by tradition in some communities, the growing rejection among young females and highly educated students suggests an undercurrent of change. This evolution may not be linear or uniform but offers hope that ongoing dialogue and empowerment can erode the cultural acceptance of honor-based violence over time.
Moreover, the researchers emphasize the ethical dimension of engaging youth in conversations about honor killings. By incorporating student voices in research and intervention design, stakeholders can ensure that efforts are grounded in the realities of those most affected. This participatory approach is vital, as external interventions that ignore local context risk rejection or limited impact.
The study also calls attention to the role of media and digital platforms in shaping attitudes. With increased internet penetration and social media use among Palestinian students, new forms of information dissemination and community engagement are emerging. These platforms can serve as both opportunities and challenges—promoting progressive views while sometimes reinforcing regressive narratives. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for designing effective communication strategies.
In light of these findings, the authors advocate for multi-sectoral collaboration involving educators, religious leaders, policymakers, and civil society organizations. Such coalitions can address honor killings from multiple angles—legal reform, education, community dialogue, and survivor support. This holistic approach acknowledges that honor killings are not merely individual acts of violence but symptoms of broader social and structural inequities.
The research also cautions against simplistic portrayals of Palestinian society as monolithically supportive of honor killings. The data reveal significant heterogeneity in attitudes, shaped by gender, education, and personal beliefs. This complexity must be reflected in discourse and policy to avoid stigmatization and to identify allies within communities for change.
Finally, the study’s cross-sectional nature provides a snapshot but also invites longitudinal research to monitor how attitudes evolve, especially as the region navigates social and political transformations. Tracking these changes over time will be invaluable for assessing the effectiveness of interventions and adapting strategies accordingly.
In conclusion, this landmark study represents a critical contribution to the global understanding of honor killings by centering Palestinian youth perspectives. It combines technical rigor with cultural sensitivity, illuminating pathways for change in a deeply challenging domain. As conversations about gender-based violence continue to gain prominence worldwide, such research underscores the necessity of contextualized, empirical insights to drive meaningful progress.
Subject of Research: Palestinian students’ attitudes toward honor killing crimes
Article Title: Palestinian students’ attitudes toward honor killing crimes: a quantitative, cross-sectional study
Article References:
Jabali, O., Hamamra, B. & Ayyoub, A.A. Palestinian students’ attitudes toward honor killing crimes: a quantitative, cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol 13, 861 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03159-0
Image Credits: AI Generated
