A fascinating new study conducted by researchers from University College London (UCL) has shed light on a sequence of over 100 small earthquakes that shook Surrey between 2018 and 2019, positing that these tremors were potentially linked to oil extraction activities from a well situated approximately 5 to 10 kilometers away. The earthquakes, which registered magnitudes spanning from 1.34 to 3.18 on the Richter scale, resulted in tangible repercussions for local residents, including structural damages to homes such as cracks in walls and ceilings, alongside unsettling reports of objects shaking violently during these seismic events.
Geologists have long debated the relationship between these seismic activities and oil extraction at the Horse Hill well. Past arguments were staunchly divided; some scientists challenged the correlation, asserting that the patterns of seismic activity did not align with oil extraction timelines. Notably, periods of heightened oil extraction did not consistently coincide with surges in earthquake activity, casting doubt on any causal connection. The discourse pointed towards a much-needed examination of the evidence and methodologies surrounding the investigations into the origins of these earthquakes.
The latest research published in Geological Magazine utilized a sophisticated mathematical model to simulate earthquake occurrences in response to oil extraction volumes and timings. This innovative computational analysis involved over a million simulations, uncovering a noteworthy correlation between the predicted frequency of earthquakes according to their simulated data and actual occurrences as observed during the aforementioned period of activity. This alignment proposes a plausible link between oil extraction practices and the emergence of seismic disturbances, positioning it as a vital area of inquiry.
Lead author Dr. Matthew Fox from UCL’s Earth Sciences department addressed the duality of their findings, stating, “Our study suggests there is a link between the earthquakes and oil extraction at Horse Hill but we cannot rule out that this link is a coincidence. More work needs to be done to understand if this is the cause and effect.” Acknowledging the ambiguity inherent in the data, Dr. Fox emphasizes the necessity for further investigation to firmly establish whether oil extraction truly acted as a catalyst for the earthquakes.
Interestingly, oil extraction activities at Horse Hill came to a halt in October 2020 after a landmark legal ruling by the Supreme Court. The ruling emphasized that the extensive climate impacts of the oil extraction project needed thorough consideration prior to the approval bestowed by Surrey County Council. However, in a sign that the industry may not be at a standstill, a separate oil drilling exploratory project received council approval in Balcombe, West Sussex. This new endeavor faces legal opposition from a residents’ group, with a compelling court case set to be heard by the Court of Appeal early next month in January 2025.
The mechanisms behind the interaction between oil extraction and seismic activity provide additional complexity. As oil is pulled from the earth, the fluid pressure within the surrounding rock formations undergoes substantial alterations. These pressure changes can trickle through the geological layers, potentially reaching subterranean fault lines and triggering seismic events. The manner in which this pressure diffuses is contingent upon the rock’s permeability—its ability to allow fluids to traverse through it. Notably, certain rock types have vastly different properties, which can influence the timing and frequency of any resultant earthquakes.
For their study, the researchers effectively incorporated diverse rock types into their mathematical model, illustrating the vastly different permeabilities of Portland Rock and Kimmeridge rock. They established that a shift between these rock types could drastically vary the timeline for pressure-induced earthquakes, with permeability rates differing by a factor of one million. This significant disparity means that the lag time between oil extraction and the onset of an earthquake could range from a matter of days to several weeks, underscoring the complexity of these geological interactions.
Although the sequence of tremors began shortly before the initiation of oil extraction activities, the researchers provide a plausible alternative narrative. It is theorized that preparatory operations—such as well inspections and pressure evaluations—could have instigated pressure changes potent enough to affect nearby fault lines, thereby creating conditions ripe for earthquake generation.
The timing of the installation of seismic monitoring equipment further obfuscates the understanding of the earthquakes’ genesis. Seismometers were only deployed in the area following the occurrence of the first significant earthquakes, thereby leaving a gap in the recorded data. As a consequence, any minor seismic events predating the installation of monitoring equipment may have gone undocumented. This presents an urgent requirement for rigorous seismic monitoring protocols prior to the commencement of oil extraction operations at potential drilling sites.
Co-author Professor Philip Meredith, also from UCL’s Earth Sciences department, articulated the significance of the research findings while instilling a note of caution regarding future oil extraction activities, stating, “Caution should be the byword. It is no good saying you don’t have a problem when you potentially do.” His sentiments emphasize the anomalous nature of seismic activity in Surrey, where a historical lack of significant earthquakes heightens the exceptionalism of these recent tremors.
This research presents a critical juncture in the ongoing dialogue surrounding the impacts of human activity on geological stability. Understanding these intricate relationships between resource extraction and seismicity is paramount in order to facilitate responsible environmental stewardship while balancing the energy demands of a growing population.
In summation, this compelling study invites renewed inquiry into the multifaceted nature of earthquakes and their potential correlations with anthropogenic activities, particularly oil extraction. While the findings indicate a plausible connection between oil extraction and seismic events, further research will be essential in unearthing the complexities of this relationship. Only through continued investigation can the scientific community reveal the true narrative behind these intriguing geological phenomena.
Subject of Research: The potential link between oil extraction and induced seismic activity.
Article Title: Small Earthquakes in Surrey Linked to Oil Extraction Activities
News Publication Date: January 2025
Web References:
References: Geological Magazine, DOI: 10.1017/S0016756824000505
Image Credits:
Keywords: Earthquakes, Oil Extraction, Seismic Activity, Geological Research, Pressure Change, Permeability, Mathematical Modeling, Environmental Impact, UCL, Horse Hill Well, Earth Sciences, Seismometers.
