In a groundbreaking discovery published in Current Biology, researchers at the Francis Crick Institute have unveiled intricate details regarding how mice interpret social dominance through chemical signals. This study reveals that mice do not rely merely on physical traits or past interactions but rather employ a sophisticated mechanism involving airborne odors and direct chemical contact to ascertain the social rank of unfamiliar conspecifics. These findings deepen our understanding of animal social dynamics and hold intriguing parallels with human social cognition.
Mammalian social structures often rely on hierarchical organization to mitigate conflict and ensure reproductive success. In mice, such hierarchies play a critical role in maintaining social order, where dominant individuals exert control over resources and mating opportunities. Prior hypotheses suggested that dominance behaviours in mice might be fixed traits, or alternatively, that visual or physical cues such as size or posture communicate rank. However, the Crick team challenged this notion by demonstrating that chemical communication is paramount for rank assessment in unfamiliar mice.
The experimental foundation of the study was built around a well-established behavioral assay involving a transparent tube confrontation. Two male mice, introduced from opposite ends of the tube, meet in the center in what becomes a contest of dominance. Traditionally, the subordinate individual retreats, cementing the dominance hierarchy. By analyzing these interactions first within cage-mates to establish a baseline hierarchy, researchers then exposed mice to unknown opponents to observe how rank recognition occurred under unfamiliar conditions.
Strikingly, mice exhibited an immediate ability to assess the dominant status of an intruder without prior direct encounters. This indicates a form of social inference, where mice compare others’ rank to their own via detected chemical signals. To disentangle which sensory modalities facilitated this recognition, experiments were conducted in complete darkness, effectively ruling out visual cues, and on castrated animals, removing the potential influence of sex hormones. Neither manipulation hindered the mice’s ability to correctly identify social rank.
The research further dissected the chemosensory systems in mice, focusing on two pivotal pathways: the olfactory system, responsible for airborne odor detection, and the vomeronasal system, which processes chemical signals transferred through direct physical contact. Blocking either system independently left rank recognition intact, suggesting a redundant or compensatory mechanism. However, simultaneous ablation of both systems abolished the ability to discern social rank, highlighting the necessity of integrated chemosensory input for accurate social judgement.
This dual-sensory reliance spotlights an elegant neural integration process, where airborne and contact-based chemical cues are synthesized to guide social decisions. The work hints at complex neural computations occurring before observable dominance or submissive behaviours manifest, implying that social rank perception is a cognitive process as much as a behavioral one. This challenges older views suggesting that certain mice are inherently aggressive or submissive, showing instead that behaviour is context-dependent and governed by sensory-driven assessment.
Beyond the realm of murine social hierarchies, this research offers compelling analogies to human social cognition. Just as mice use chemical signals to evaluate social rank, humans infer social status through a multitude of sensory inputs—including language nuances, facial expressions, and attire—allowing dynamic social navigation even in unfamiliar groups. The parallels drawn provide a fascinating perspective on how social hierarchies might be universally processed across species with distinct sensory modalities.
Neven Borak, the study’s lead author, reflects on this intersection of animal and human social processing: “Mice weigh up strangers using chemical cues and can detect social status without needing an extensive history of confrontations with those specific opponents. This is a fascinating phenomenon that humans do too mostly using visual cues. Our work offers an interesting perspective on social mobility: humans, like mice, can enter a new group of people but still maintain understanding of own social rank and gauge the social status of unfamiliar people.”
Jonny Kohl, senior author and group leader at the Francis Crick Institute’s State-Dependent Neural Processing Laboratory, emphasized the novelty of these insights: “We’ve shown for the first time how mice integrate internal and external information about dominance. This shows that a decision based on relative ranks is made in the brain before mice show either aggression or submissive behaviour, rather than there being fixed differences in behaviours leading to an aggressive or docile mouse.”
The lab’s broader research agenda focuses on how physiological states modulate neural circuits and behavior. Understanding how internal states such as stress, pregnancy, or sleep impact cognitive functions could open new vistas into the neuroscience behind social behaviour. This study into dominance rank recognition thus represents a vital step in decoding the intersection between bodily states, sensory processing, and social decision-making.
Future research will delve deeper into mapping the specific brain regions responsible for these complex computations of social rank. By pinpointing neural circuits that integrate chemical cues with internal physiological signals, scientists aim to clarify the neural architecture underpinning decision-making processes related to dominance, submission, and social interaction strategy.
This discovery underscores the essential role of chemosensation in social cognition—a sensory process often overshadowed by vision and audition in higher mammals but clearly vital in the animal kingdom. Such insights may provide foundational knowledge for addressing social behavior abnormalities in neuropsychiatric conditions and inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies.
Ultimately, the Francis Crick Institute’s study paints a rich picture of how animals navigate social landscapes through sensory integration and cognitive evaluation. The intricate dance of chemical signals guiding the subtleties of dominance and submission expands our appreciation of animal behaviour complexity and mirrors key aspects of human social intelligence.
Subject of Research: Dominance rank inference in mice using chemosensory systems
Article Title: Dominance rank inference in mice via chemosensation
News Publication Date: 19-May-2025
References: Borak, N. et al. (2025). Dominance rank inference in mice via chemosensation. Current Biology.
Keywords: Mouse models, Social hierarchy, Chemosensation, Olfactory system, Vomeronasal system, Behavioral neuroscience, Social cognition, Animal models
