In the face of ongoing climate change, forests worldwide are experiencing profound shifts in growth patterns, phenology, and overall health. Among these shifts, the lengthening of growing seasons—primarily driven by rising temperatures and earlier springs—has been widely regarded as a potential compensatory mechanism for climate-induced stress on forest productivity. However, a groundbreaking study led by Tumajer, Kašpar, Altman, and their colleagues, published in Nature Communications, challenges this optimistic view for drought-prone temperate forests in Central-Southeast Europe. Their findings reveal a sobering reality: longer growing seasons may fail to offset the detrimental impacts of increased drought frequency and severity, leading to an overall growth decline.
This comprehensive study meticulously analyzed growth data across diverse temperate forest ecosystems representative of Central to Southeast Europe. Using an array of dendrochronological assessments, combined with climate modeling, the researchers probed the interactions between climatic drivers—particularly drought stress—and phenological shifts such as extended growing seasons. The data highlighted a paradox: although trees enjoy longer periods suitable for photosynthesis and growth under warming conditions, the simultaneous exacerbation of water deficits severely restricts their capacity to capitalize on these additional growing days.
The team’s analysis was anchored on high-resolution tree-ring chronologies that captured interannual growth variability along climatic gradients affected by increasing drought intensity. This approach allowed the researchers to disentangle the complex relationships between temperature, precipitation patterns, and tree physiological responses over several decades. Notably, the prolongation of the growing season was verified through remote sensing and ground-based phenological observations, confirming a significant advancement in spring onset and delayed autumn senescence within the studied regions.
However, this extension did not translate into expected productivity gains. Instead, drought episodes increasingly dominated growth trends, manifesting as pronounced reductions in ring width and biomass accumulation during dry years. This finding implies a critical threshold beyond which water availability becomes the overriding factor, independently curbing growth regardless of extended photosynthetically active periods. The study underscores the paramount limitation imposed by water scarcity in temperate forests, particularly where summer droughts intensify under climate change scenarios.
Central to this phenomenon is the physiological stress drought imposes on trees, impeding carbon assimilation despite potentially favorable temperature regimes. Water stress triggers stomatal closure to minimize transpiration, inadvertently restricting CO2 uptake and reducing photosynthetic capacity. Concurrently, prolonged drought can induce hydraulic failure and damage photosynthetic apparatus, further compounding growth suppression. The study’s integration of physiological insights with ecological data provides a holistic understanding of why increased growing season length alone cannot ameliorate drought-induced limitations.
Moreover, the research elucidates spatial heterogeneity in forest responses attributable to species-specific drought tolerance and local climatic conditions. While drought-resilient species maintained relatively stable growth, more sensitive taxa exhibited acute declines, raising concerns about compositional shifts within forest communities. Such alterations may have cascading effects on ecosystem functions, including carbon sequestration, habitat provision, and biodiversity conservation. These findings challenge previous models predicting uniform benefits of longer growing seasons under warming, emphasizing the need to account for water availability constraints.
The implications of this research extend far beyond Central-Southeast Europe, as many temperate forests globally share vulnerability to increasing drought frequency and intensity. The anticipated mismatch between phenological advancements and water supply forecasts a future where growth losses could negate climate change benefits previously attributed to thermal amelioration. This growing body of evidence calls for a recalibration of forest management strategies, incorporating resilience-building measures such as species selection, thinning, and soil moisture conservation to buffer drought impacts.
Importantly, the study introduces new considerations for carbon budget models employed in climate change projections. Historically, extended growing seasons have often been factored as a positive feedback mechanism enhancing forest carbon uptake. However, by revealing that increased drought stress can drastically undermine this effect, the findings urge a reconsideration of carbon sequestration potential in temperate forests. The resulting uncertainty affects predictions of global carbon dynamics, highlighting the intricate interplay between climatic variables and biological responses.
The multi-disciplinary approach of this research—merging dendrochronology, remote sensing, ecosystem physiology, and climate modeling—exemplifies the integrative efforts needed to unravel complex ecological processes. Such collaboration enables precise quantification of growth trends and phenological shifts, while simulating future scenarios under diverse climate projections. This methodological rigor reinforces the robustness of the conclusions and sets a benchmark for future investigations addressing climate-forest interactions.
Additionally, the findings paint a nuanced picture of forest vulnerability at the ecosystem level. While some temperate forests might initially benefit from prolonged growing periods, the exacerbation of drought stress acts as a potent counterbalance, ultimately limiting net productivity. This reveals the double-edged nature of warming effects, where beneficial traits coexist with increasingly hostile conditions. Recognizing this duality is critical for developing adaptive management frameworks aimed at sustaining forest health under shifting climatic baselines.
Another salient aspect illuminated by Tumajer et al. is the temporal scale at which drought impacts manifest. Beyond immediate growth suppression, recurrent drought events may weaken trees cumulatively, reducing resilience to pests, diseases, and other stressors. Over time, these compounded effects could lead to structural changes in forest architecture and heightened mortality risks. Such dynamics necessitate long-term monitoring to anticipate and mitigate cascading ecosystem consequences.
Furthermore, the research highlights the necessity to integrate hydrological variables prominently into phenological and productivity modeling. Traditionally, temperature regimes have dominated growth predictions; however, this study demonstrates that neglecting soil moisture and drought variability compromises accuracy. Incorporating water availability metrics into growth models refines forecasts and better informs conservation policies, ensuring that management interventions are grounded in realistic ecological constraints.
From a broader perspective, this study contributes to a transformative understanding of climate change consequences for forest ecosystems. It calls into question simplistic narratives that equate warming with universally positive growth responses and invokes a more sophisticated framework recognizing multifactorial stressors. The nuanced elucidation of growth-drought dynamics facilitates more informed debates on climate mitigation and adaptation strategies, emphasizing the imperative to safeguard forest vitality amid escalating environmental pressures.
In conclusion, the study by Tumajer, Kašpar, Altman, et al. provides compelling evidence that longer growing seasons do not inherently guarantee improved growth outcomes in drought-prone temperate forests of Central-Southeast Europe. Instead, increasing drought severity under climate change confronts these ecosystems with formidable challenges that potentially overshadow phenological benefits. As the global community grapples with climate mitigation, adaptation, and biodiversity conservation, such insights are invaluable for tailoring responsive, evidence-based interventions to sustain the forests that underpin planetary health and resilience.
Subject of Research: The interaction between extended growing seasons and drought stress effects on the growth of temperate forests in Central-Southeast Europe under climate change.
Article Title: Longer growing seasons will not offset growth loss in drought-prone temperate forests of Central-Southeast Europe.
Article References:
Tumajer, J., Kašpar, J., Altman, J. et al. Longer growing seasons will not offset growth loss in drought-prone temperate forests of Central-Southeast Europe. Nat Commun 16, 9535 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64568-8
Image Credits: AI Generated
