In the modern age of environmental science, the evaluation of water quality has emerged as one of the most formidable challenges confronting researchers and policymakers alike. The intricate web of anthropogenic chemical pollutants contaminating aquatic systems is expanding relentlessly, driven by burgeoning industrial activity, urbanization, and the pervasive use of synthetic compounds. This complexity is compounded by the reliance on chemical oxidants in water treatment processes, which, while critical for disinfection and removal of contaminants, inadvertently generate a multitude of transformation products. Many of these by-products possess unknown, and potentially deleterious, toxicological profiles. As such, conventional methods of water quality assessment are strained to keep pace with both the evolving chemical landscape and the emergent risks it poses to ecosystems and human health.
Historically, the arsenal for toxicity evaluation has heavily depended upon in vitro assays, which simulate specific biological responses in controlled settings. These assays provide invaluable insights into a spectrum of toxicological endpoints—ranging from cytotoxicity to endocrine disruption and genotoxicity. Nevertheless, they fall short when it comes to pinpointing the exact molecular culprits responsible for the observed toxic effects in water samples. This limitation stems from the intrinsic complexity of environmental mixtures, where thousands of chemicals, both known and unknown, may interact or co-exist. Consequently, while in vitro assays serve as powerful screening tools, their inability to identify causative agents restricts their utility for comprehensive contamination assessment and risk prioritization.
Continued progress has been achievable through the integration of advanced in vitro methodologies with non-targeted chemical analyses. These combined efforts have accelerated the discovery of emerging contaminants and spotlighted chemicals of concern that evade traditional targeted screening. However, this combined approach is not without its biases; it remains largely dependent on analytes amenable to existing sample extraction and preparation protocols. Highly polar substances, reactive electrophiles, and volatile compounds pose significant analytical challenges due to their physicochemical properties and transient nature. This analytical bottleneck means that certain classes of toxicants may remain undetected or underestimated, perpetuating gaps in our understanding of water toxicity.
It is within this context that the field is turning toward ‘in chemico’ approaches, which promise to bridge critical gaps left by conventional techniques. In chemico toxicology, at its core, involves the study of chemical reactivity and interactions at a molecular level—eschewing living systems in favor of biomimetic or purely chemical reaction-based assays. The allure of these methods lies in their ability to directly interrogate the molecular initiating event (MIE), the first and pivotal interaction between a toxicant and a biological molecule that sets forth a cascade of adverse outcomes. By focusing on these molecular-level interactions, researchers can gain mechanistic insights into toxicity, facilitating more accurate hazard identification and prioritization.
The concept of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) serves as a critical framework in this emergent field. An AOP delineates the progression of toxicological effects from the initial molecular trigger through cellular and tissue responses, ultimately manifesting as adverse effects on organismal or population health. Pinpointing the MIE within this cascade is essential for targeted toxicity assessment strategies. In chemico approaches uniquely position themselves to capture this stage by examining the covalent and non-covalent bonding interactions between contaminants and biological nucleophiles such as proteins, nucleic acids, and peptides. These interactions often govern the initiation of toxicity, especially for reactive electrophilic compounds that form adducts with biomolecules, triggering downstream biological perturbations.
A striking advantage of in chemico methods is their adaptability to compounds typically elusive to standard analytical workflows. Highly polar molecules, often poor candidates for chromatographic separation or mass spectrometric detection, as well as reactive intermediates and short-lived species, can nonetheless be studied via their interactions with carefully chosen biomolecular probes. Furthermore, in chemico assays afford high specificity and sensitivity for these interactions, enabling the elucidation of reactivity profiles that underpin toxicity potential. This renders the approach highly complementary to in vitro bioassays, which gauge biological consequences but often leave the initiating chemistry unidentified.
Crucially, in chemico approaches are not limited to the interrogation of singular, purified contaminants. They have demonstrated significant promise in the assessment of complex mixtures—which characterize real-world environmental samples. By applying biomolecule-incubation protocols with environmental extracts or laboratory-incubated samples, researchers can discern the overall reactivity or ‘toxicity load’ imparted by the mixture. This holistic view aids in revealing emergent properties of mixtures, including synergistic or antagonistic effects, often absent in studies focusing solely on individual compounds.
Moreover, the identification of specific toxicants within complex environmental mixtures can be pragmatically approached via coupling in chemico assays with non-targeted analytical techniques. Chemical entities capable of interacting with biomolecules are enriched, isolated, and subsequently characterized by advanced mass spectrometry and data analysis pipelines. This strategy not only enhances the discovery of novel and understudied toxicants but also facilitates prioritization based upon molecular reactivity and potential hazard, an asset for environmental monitoring and regulatory decision-making.
Despite these promising developments, several challenges remain to be addressed for the widespread adoption and impact of in chemico toxicology in water quality assessment. Refinement of the biomolecular probes—whether peptides, proteins, or nucleic acids—is paramount to maximize sensitivity and specificity for diverse classes of contaminants. Additionally, establishing standardized protocols for sample treatment, assay conditions, and data interpretation will be key to comparability and reproducibility across studies. The continued integration of computational modeling and cheminformatics is also anticipated to accelerate mechanistic understanding and facilitate the prediction of molecular interactions across vast contaminant libraries.
The future trajectory of in chemico methods is further invigorated by potential combinatorial approaches that synergize chemical reactivity assessments with high-throughput bioassays, omics technologies, and advanced analytical chemistry. Such multi-dimensional platforms promise unprecedented resolution in deciphering the complex toxicological landscape of waterborne contaminants. By revealing molecular fingerprints of reactivity in situ, these approaches hold the potential to preemptively identify emerging threat candidates before their presence escalates to ecological or public health crises.
Furthermore, in chemico assessments could inform the design and optimization of water treatment technologies. Understanding the molecular initiating events triggered by both parent compounds and transformation products enables the tailoring of treatment methods to minimize the formation of reactive or toxic by-products. This component is increasingly critical as water treatment operators face mounting pressure to ensure safety amidst evolving contaminant profiles and regulatory standards.
The burgeoning field of molecular toxicology exemplifies an intersection of chemistry, biology, and environmental science that redefines traditional paradigms of pollutant monitoring. By unravelling how contaminants chemically interact at the molecular level, in chemico approaches reveal vulnerabilities and hidden hazards within environmental matrices that might otherwise remain obscured. This information empowers stakeholders to prioritize contaminants not solely based on abundance but on intrinsic toxicity potential, guiding resource allocation for remediation and policy.
In summary, as the environmental and public health communities grapple with the escalating complexity of chemical mixtures in water, in chemico toxicity approaches offer a transformative lens. They complement established bioassays by providing mechanistic insights into molecular interactions, enabling the identification, prioritization, and ultimately the mitigation of water contaminants. While significant research and method development are still required, the advances to date herald a promising future where water quality assessment is not only more comprehensive but also mechanistically informed and predictive.
As technological innovations continue to democratize advanced chemical analysis and expand our molecular toolkit, the deployment of in chemico tools in environmental monitoring networks may soon shift from specialized research endeavors to routine operations. Such evolution holds profound implications for safeguarding water resources, protecting ecological integrity, and securing public health in an increasingly anthropogenically altered world.
Subject of Research: In chemico toxicity assessment methods for identifying and prioritizing water contaminants.
Article Title: In chemico toxicity approaches to assess, identify and prioritize contaminants in water.
Article References:
Grace, D.N., Rorie, A. & Prasse, C. In chemico toxicity approaches to assess, identify and prioritize contaminants in water. Nat Water (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00468-x
Image Credits: AI Generated
