Wednesday, October 1, 2025
Science
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Scienmag
No Result
View All Result
Home Science News Policy

European Court of Human Rights is “backsliding” on legal protections for asylum seekers, study says

April 22, 2024
in Policy
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
European Court of Human Rights is “backsliding” on legal protections for asylum seekers, study says
66
SHARES
598
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT

The European Court of Human Rights is “backsliding” by surreptitiously reversing its principles established to protect asylum seekers, a new study says.

The European Court of Human Rights is “backsliding” by surreptitiously reversing its principles established to protect asylum seekers, a new study says.

It is a decade since the Court first established that asylum seekers are inherently and particularly vulnerable in law.

The research shows that in recent years the Court has moved away from this position, albeit without actually acknowledging this or explaining why. The research warns that it is now uncertain what exactly is needed for any particular asylum applicant to be judged as sufficiently vulnerable to receive special protection under the European Convention on Human Rights.

The study, by Dr Ben Hudson from the University of Exeter Law School, is published in the International Journal of Law in Context.

Dr Hudson says: “The consequence of this backsliding is not only that the judicially recognised concept of asylum vulnerability is undermined, but that some of the most vulnerable applicants that come before the Court suffer renewed marginalisation, and, in some circumstances, exclusion from the ‘special protection’ to which they were previously afforded.

“The ECtHR is backsliding in its asylum-related jurisprudence when this is viewed through the lens of vulnerability. In the years since the Grand Chamber first affirmed asylum vulnerability the Court has subtly, but markedly, reversed its position to the point where it is now at risk of disappearing altogether.”

In some judgments, the ‘particular vulnerability’ of asylum seekers as a group has been recognised, but the Court has caveated this through a comparison with other asylum seekers in the same situation. The research says this has resulted in some applicants being excluded from special protection. It criticises the use of this caveat as causing uncertainty and being “highly impractical”.

Dr Hudson says: “It is improbable that the Court will ever have equivalent information pertaining to the situation of every asylum seeker within a particular detention centre or confinement zone for comparisons to be meaningful or warranted. There is seemingly nothing to stop the Court from introducing more and more points of contrast to distinguish between otherwise similarly located asylum seekers.”

In other judgments, the Court has failed to mention or give due regard to the inherent and particular vulnerability associated with being an asylum seeker under the Convention.

In others the Court has linguistically altered its vulnerability principle, that particular vulnerability is inherent to one’s situation as an asylum seeker, to the detriment of claimants.

Most of the judgments examined as part of the research came after 2018. In 2011 asylum seekers were classed by the court as ‘a particularly underprivileged and vulnerable population group in need of special protection’, with that vulnerability being inherent in their situation as asylum seekers.

Dr Hudson says: “The Court appears to have tacitly normalised the failure to recognise the vulnerability of asylum seekers and the resistance to employ its own vulnerability reasoning.

“Being an asylum seeker is no longer by itself determinative of particular vulnerability. On the Court’s discretion, an indeterminate range of other factors may also be considered such as being a minor or in fragile health.

“Without a pronounced turn of direction by the ECtHR, the hope that many had for vulnerability reasoning to provide a more inclusive, more humane, response to the threats to Convention rights of persons seeking refuge in Europe, will be dashed forever.”



Journal

International Journal of Law in Context

DOI

10.1017/S1744552323000332

Article Title

Asylum Marginalisation Renewed: ‘Vulnerability Backsliding’ at the European Court of Human Rights

Article Publication Date

26-Mar-2024

Share26Tweet17
Previous Post

To build a better AI helper, start by modeling the irrational behavior of humans

Next Post

The Longevity & Aging Series: Season 2 premiere episode

Related Posts

blank
Policy

Social Support Boosts Mpox Care via Stigma Reduction

October 1, 2025
blank
Policy

The Municipal Finance Journal Now Part of the Chicago Journals Program

September 30, 2025
blank
Policy

Digital Science Launches Dimensions Research Security API

September 30, 2025
blank
Policy

SCAI Champions Equitable Policies to Safeguard Individuals with Congenital Heart Disease

September 30, 2025
blank
Policy

Study Finds Popular Yoga Style Associated with Increased Fall Risk in Older Australians

September 30, 2025
blank
Policy

Fewer Than Half of US Adults Endorse Routine Vaccinations During Pregnancy

September 30, 2025
Next Post
The Longevity & Aging Series: Season 2 premiere episode

The Longevity & Aging Series: Season 2 premiere episode

  • Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    27561 shares
    Share 11021 Tweet 6888
  • University of Seville Breaks 120-Year-Old Mystery, Revises a Key Einstein Concept

    969 shares
    Share 388 Tweet 242
  • Bee body mass, pathogens and local climate influence heat tolerance

    646 shares
    Share 258 Tweet 162
  • Researchers record first-ever images and data of a shark experiencing a boat strike

    513 shares
    Share 205 Tweet 128
  • Groundbreaking Clinical Trial Reveals Lubiprostone Enhances Kidney Function

    476 shares
    Share 190 Tweet 119
Science

Embark on a thrilling journey of discovery with Scienmag.com—your ultimate source for cutting-edge breakthroughs. Immerse yourself in a world where curiosity knows no limits and tomorrow’s possibilities become today’s reality!

RECENT NEWS

  • Polygenic Risk Scores Show Promise in Forecasting Breast Cancer Risk for Early-Stage Patients
  • Oropharyngeal Cancer Risk in U.S. Revealed
  • Gut Microbe Tryptophan Metabolite Impacts Pneumonia
  • Career Adaptability’s Impact on Psychiatrist Burnout

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology
  • Athmospheric
  • Biology
  • Blog
  • Bussines
  • Cancer
  • Chemistry
  • Climate
  • Earth Science
  • Marine
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Pediatry
  • Policy
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Science Education
  • Social Science
  • Space
  • Technology and Engineering

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,185 other subscribers

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Discover more from Science

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading