Friday, October 24, 2025
Science
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Scienmag
No Result
View All Result
Home Science News Policy

European Court of Human Rights is “backsliding” on legal protections for asylum seekers, study says

April 22, 2024
in Policy
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
European Court of Human Rights is “backsliding” on legal protections for asylum seekers, study says
66
SHARES
600
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT

The European Court of Human Rights is “backsliding” by surreptitiously reversing its principles established to protect asylum seekers, a new study says.

The European Court of Human Rights is “backsliding” by surreptitiously reversing its principles established to protect asylum seekers, a new study says.

It is a decade since the Court first established that asylum seekers are inherently and particularly vulnerable in law.

The research shows that in recent years the Court has moved away from this position, albeit without actually acknowledging this or explaining why. The research warns that it is now uncertain what exactly is needed for any particular asylum applicant to be judged as sufficiently vulnerable to receive special protection under the European Convention on Human Rights.

The study, by Dr Ben Hudson from the University of Exeter Law School, is published in the International Journal of Law in Context.

Dr Hudson says: “The consequence of this backsliding is not only that the judicially recognised concept of asylum vulnerability is undermined, but that some of the most vulnerable applicants that come before the Court suffer renewed marginalisation, and, in some circumstances, exclusion from the ‘special protection’ to which they were previously afforded.

“The ECtHR is backsliding in its asylum-related jurisprudence when this is viewed through the lens of vulnerability. In the years since the Grand Chamber first affirmed asylum vulnerability the Court has subtly, but markedly, reversed its position to the point where it is now at risk of disappearing altogether.”

In some judgments, the ‘particular vulnerability’ of asylum seekers as a group has been recognised, but the Court has caveated this through a comparison with other asylum seekers in the same situation. The research says this has resulted in some applicants being excluded from special protection. It criticises the use of this caveat as causing uncertainty and being “highly impractical”.

Dr Hudson says: “It is improbable that the Court will ever have equivalent information pertaining to the situation of every asylum seeker within a particular detention centre or confinement zone for comparisons to be meaningful or warranted. There is seemingly nothing to stop the Court from introducing more and more points of contrast to distinguish between otherwise similarly located asylum seekers.”

In other judgments, the Court has failed to mention or give due regard to the inherent and particular vulnerability associated with being an asylum seeker under the Convention.

In others the Court has linguistically altered its vulnerability principle, that particular vulnerability is inherent to one’s situation as an asylum seeker, to the detriment of claimants.

Most of the judgments examined as part of the research came after 2018. In 2011 asylum seekers were classed by the court as ‘a particularly underprivileged and vulnerable population group in need of special protection’, with that vulnerability being inherent in their situation as asylum seekers.

Dr Hudson says: “The Court appears to have tacitly normalised the failure to recognise the vulnerability of asylum seekers and the resistance to employ its own vulnerability reasoning.

“Being an asylum seeker is no longer by itself determinative of particular vulnerability. On the Court’s discretion, an indeterminate range of other factors may also be considered such as being a minor or in fragile health.

“Without a pronounced turn of direction by the ECtHR, the hope that many had for vulnerability reasoning to provide a more inclusive, more humane, response to the threats to Convention rights of persons seeking refuge in Europe, will be dashed forever.”



Journal

International Journal of Law in Context

DOI

10.1017/S1744552323000332

Article Title

Asylum Marginalisation Renewed: ‘Vulnerability Backsliding’ at the European Court of Human Rights

Article Publication Date

26-Mar-2024

Share26Tweet17
Previous Post

To build a better AI helper, start by modeling the irrational behavior of humans

Next Post

The Longevity & Aging Series: Season 2 premiere episode

Related Posts

blank
Policy

Scientists Urge Incorporating Cumulative Impacts of Extreme Climate Events in Penguin Conservation Efforts

October 23, 2025
blank
Policy

Open Research Practices Adoption Surpasses Expectations

October 23, 2025
blank
Policy

From “Forever Chemicals” to PFAS-Free Water: Charting Two Decades of Global Research and Policy Pathways

October 23, 2025
blank
Policy

eLTER Unveils Inaugural Policy Brief on Expanding Carbon Removal Strategies for Achieving Climate Neutrality

October 22, 2025
blank
Policy

Call for Papers: JMIR Publications’ Journal of Medical Internet Research Seeks Submissions on Navigating AI-Enabled Uncertainty

October 22, 2025
blank
Policy

UConn Researcher Finds Commercial Wind Projects Boost Community Home Values

October 21, 2025
Next Post
The Longevity & Aging Series: Season 2 premiere episode

The Longevity & Aging Series: Season 2 premiere episode

  • Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    Mothers who receive childcare support from maternal grandparents show more parental warmth, finds NTU Singapore study

    27571 shares
    Share 11025 Tweet 6891
  • University of Seville Breaks 120-Year-Old Mystery, Revises a Key Einstein Concept

    980 shares
    Share 392 Tweet 245
  • Bee body mass, pathogens and local climate influence heat tolerance

    648 shares
    Share 259 Tweet 162
  • Researchers record first-ever images and data of a shark experiencing a boat strike

    516 shares
    Share 206 Tweet 129
  • Groundbreaking Clinical Trial Reveals Lubiprostone Enhances Kidney Function

    484 shares
    Share 194 Tweet 121
Science

Embark on a thrilling journey of discovery with Scienmag.com—your ultimate source for cutting-edge breakthroughs. Immerse yourself in a world where curiosity knows no limits and tomorrow’s possibilities become today’s reality!

RECENT NEWS

  • Intellectual Disability and Behavioral Issues in Fragile X
  • PM2.5 Pollution Linked to Weather in Pakistan Capitals
  • Factors Influencing Nurse Adverse Event Reporting in China
  • Innovative Teaching Approaches for South African Optometry Postgraduates

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology
  • Athmospheric
  • Biology
  • Blog
  • Bussines
  • Cancer
  • Chemistry
  • Climate
  • Earth Science
  • Marine
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Pediatry
  • Policy
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Science Education
  • Social Science
  • Space
  • Technology and Engineering

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,188 other subscribers

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • SCIENCE NEWS
  • CONTACT US

© 2025 Scienmag - Science Magazine

Discover more from Science

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading