In recent decades, the debate over inheritance taxation has been reignited by various economic thinkers and policymakers attempting to balance wealth distribution with incentives for growth. Yet, few proposals have garnered as much philosophical and practical scrutiny as that of Eugenio Rignano, an early 20th-century Italian economist whose unique approach to inheritance tax has, until now, remained largely unexplored in contemporary economic discourse. A groundbreaking new study by Peterfreund and Strawczynski, published in the Atlantic Economic Journal, brings renewed attention to Rignano’s inheritance tax proposal by providing a robust economic justification rooted in modern theoretical frameworks and empirical insights.
The core of Rignano’s inheritance tax idea hinges on the principle of intergenerational equity and the prevention of wealth accumulation’s distortionary effects on economic efficiency. Unlike conventional inheritance taxes that apply a flat or progressive rate on total inherited wealth, Rignano advocated for a tax structure that scales with the longevity of the inherited asset. His concept essentially promotes taxing wealth based on how many generations it has passed through, reflecting an economic perspective that wealth should not unfairly compound without productive reinvestment or contribution from current generation holders. Peterfreund and Strawczynski argue that this approach offers a dynamic mechanism to discourage rent-seeking behavior and promote a more equitable distribution of capital.
This pioneering study makes extensive use of formal economic modeling to demonstrate the benefits and challenges of implementing a Rignano-inspired tax system. The authors employ an overlapping generations model combined with optimal taxation theory to simulate long-term wealth distributions under different tax regimes. Their models reveal that taxing inherited assets with consideration to their generational residence significantly reduces wealth inequality without dampening entrepreneurial activities or incentives for saving. Importantly, the model shows that such a tax system can mitigate the distortionary effects often observed in traditional inheritance taxes, which sometimes penalize productive wealth transfers.
One of the most intriguing technical contributions of the study lies in the authors’ innovative application of endogenous growth theory to inheritance taxation. Peterfreund and Strawczynski argue that the generational scaling mechanism embedded within Rignano’s frame inherently aligns individuals’ incentives with optimal capital allocation. They meticulously analyze how transferred wealth can signal asset longevity and economic contribution, enabling policymakers to use taxation as a tool not just for revenue, but for directing capital toward projects with positive externalities and sustainable growth potential. This nuanced economic interpretation challenges orthodox views, suggesting inheritance tax reforms can be designed to enhance growth rather than stifle it.
The empirical portion of the paper proceeds with careful calibration of the model parameters against data from several advanced economies, demonstrating both the feasibility and fiscal effects of Rignano-type taxes in different economic contexts. By comparing model outputs with observed inheritance tax revenues and wealth distribution data, the authors provide compelling evidence that differentiated taxation based on asset aging could yield better social welfare outcomes. Their findings indicate that such a system would likely improve tax compliance and reduce avoidance behaviors that plague many current inheritance tax schemes.
Additionally, the paper situates Rignano’s ideas within a broader philosophical and political economy context—highlighting how inheritance taxation intertwines with societal notions of fairness, opportunity, and intergenerational justice. Peterfreund and Strawczynski underscore that modern societies increasingly recognize the role of inherited wealth in perpetuating economic disparities. Their analysis suggests that Rignano’s approach, by adjusting tax burdens through a generational lens, offers a politically palatable reform route that respects property rights while addressing capital concentration’s social costs.
An important technical section of the paper addresses criticisms often leveled at inheritance taxes: adverse effects on family-owned businesses and farms, which can be illiquid and difficult to value. The authors tackle this challenge by proposing mechanisms whereby asset longevity is assessed alongside economic productivity measures. They consider transitional rules and exemptions designed to minimize disruption while still applying core principles of the tax system. This reflects a sophisticated understanding of both tax policy design and economic realities faced by asset owners.
Peterfreund and Strawczynski also explore how advances in information technology and blockchain-based asset registries might facilitate the administrative complexities that a Rignano tax framework entails. Their discussion anticipates future governance models in which intergenerational asset tracking becomes more transparent and accurate, thereby reducing enforcement costs and unintended loopholes. This visionary perspective resonates with ongoing digital transformations in public finance and serves as a bridge between theoretical economics and practical policymaking.
The authors further engage with the behavioral economics literature, examining how inheritance tax structures influence heirs’ attitudes toward wealth consumption and investment. They propose that a tax sensitive to asset aging encourages more productive and socially beneficial uses of capital by heirs, who may otherwise treat inherited wealth as a mere windfall. This behavioral interpretation enriches the economic model by integrating human psychology, thus offering a more comprehensive understanding of the tax’s multifaceted effects.
Throughout the study, Peterfreund and Strawczynski maintain a commitment to normative economic ethics, arguing that policymaking should be informed by both empirical evidence and societal values. Their rigorous approach unites theoretical rigor with normative considerations, making a compelling case that Rignano’s inheritance tax proposal not only aligns with economic efficiency but also promotes social justice. This dual emphasis distinguishes the paper as a key contribution to contemporary debates on wealth taxation.
The timing of this study is particularly relevant amid rising concerns about wealth concentration and the socio-economic impacts of inherited fortunes in many developed countries. The paper stimulates much-needed discussion on how to craft inheritance taxes that are economically sound, politically feasible, and socially legitimate in an era marked by widening income and wealth gaps. Through its detailed analysis, this work invites policymakers and scholars alike to reconsider prevailing inheritance tax paradigms in favor of more innovative and equitable frameworks.
Though the study acknowledges implementation hurdles—including legal challenges and potential political opposition—it offers a roadmap for gradual adoption supported by empirical evidence and economic theory. The authors’ policy recommendations emphasize transparency, fairness, and adaptability, making the Rignano tax idea viable for modern economies seeking to balance growth incentives with redistributive justice.
In sum, this pioneering research revitalizes the legacy of Eugenio Rignano by providing the first comprehensive economic defense of his inheritance tax proposal grounded in contemporary methodologies. It demonstrates how a generationally scaled tax can simultaneously address wealth inequality, economic efficiency, and political acceptability. As wealth disparities continue to dominate global economic concerns, such innovative tax solutions become increasingly vital.
Peterfreund and Strawczynski’s work exemplifies how revisiting historical economic ideas through modern analytical lenses can yield transformative policy insights. Their findings suggest that inheritance taxation need not be a blunt instrument but can be finely calibrated to promote sustainable wealth distribution without compromising economic vitality—a balance much sought after yet rarely achieved.
This elegant blend of history, theory, and empirical rigor marks the study as a milestone in economic policy research, positioning Rignano’s inheritance tax proposal as a serious contender in the ongoing efforts to design fairer financial systems for future generations. As the field of economics continues to evolve, such scholarship serves as a beacon for integrating interdisciplinary perspectives into actionable policy solutions.
Subject of Research: Economic analysis and justification of Eugenio Rignano’s inheritance tax proposal based on intergenerational tax scaling.
Article Title: An Economic Justification for Rignano’s Inheritance Tax Proposal
Article References:
Peterfreund, Y., Strawczynski, M. An Economic Justification for Rignano’s Inheritance Tax Proposal.
Atl Econ J 52, 201–212 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-024-09808-w
Image Credits: AI Generated
