In the evolving landscape of organizational psychology, the subtle yet profound impacts of workplace dynamics on employee behavior continue to captivate researchers worldwide. A groundbreaking study published in BMC Psychology by Xu, Shaheen, and Bari (2025) explores the intricate relationships between organizational cronyism and employees’ psychological withdrawal, unpacking the complex psychological processes that underlie disengagement in professional settings. This research sheds light on the covert mechanisms through which favoritism not only corrodes workplace morale but also subtly drives employees away from investment in their roles and organizations.
Organizational cronyism refers to preferential treatment granted to close associates, often bypassing meritocratic criteria within corporate or institutional frameworks. This phenomenon, though frequently overlooked in favor of overt discrimination or bias, represents a potent force impacting workplace dynamics. The study meticulously delineates how cronyism fosters environments where merit loses its intended value, thus precipitating a cascade of negative psychological reactions among non-favored employees. These reactions, the study posits, directly contribute to a phenomenon termed psychological withdrawal—an insidious decline in employee engagement, characterized by mental and emotional distancing from work roles.
Central to understanding the study’s impact is the mediating role of disidentification. Disidentification, distinct from mere dissatisfaction, is a psychological construct denoting an employee’s severance of self-concept from their organization. Instead of simply feeling unhappy or underappreciated, disidentified employees actively detach their identity from their employer, perceiving organizational values and missions as incongruent with their personal beliefs and goals. This psychological distancing acts as a critical mediator by which cronyism translates into withdrawal behavior, making disengagement not just a reaction but a defensive psychological posture.
Importantly, the authors advance their theoretical model by integrating employability as a moderating variable. Employability, defined as the individual’s perceived capacity to obtain and maintain alternative employment, influences the degree to which employees respond to cronyism-induced disidentification. Those with high employability are more likely to psychologically withdraw, feeling empowered to disengage due to better perceived external opportunities, whereas low employability may bind employees to their roles despite cronyism, potentially increasing internal stress but reducing overt withdrawal behaviors.
The nuanced interplay of these variables provides a more sophisticated understanding of workplace alienation beyond classical theories of job dissatisfaction. By isolating disidentification as the primary mediating process, Xu and colleagues deliver compelling evidence that psychological withdrawal stems from identity-level processes rather than surface-level job contentment metrics. This represents an advancement in organizational behavior research, proposing that interventions should address identity re-alignment and organizational justice to mitigate withdrawal.
Methodologically, the study employed a robust quantitative approach, surveying employees across diverse occupational sectors where organizational cronyism was perceptibly influential. Utilizing psychometrically validated scales, the researchers captured data on perceived cronyism, levels of disidentification, psychological withdrawal indicators, and employability perceptions. Advanced statistical techniques, including mediation and moderation analyses, were deployed to rigorously test the hypothesized relationships, ensuring the robustness and generalizability of findings.
The implications of this research extend well beyond academic circles, touching on practical human resource management and organizational leadership strategies. Companies facing subtle yet pervasive cronyism can inadvertently cultivate disengaged workforces, thereby diminishing productivity, innovation, and employee retention. This study suggests actionable pathways for HR practitioners to detect and dismantle cronyism-related networks and to foster transparent, merit-based advancement systems that reinforce employee identification with organizational values.
Moreover, the study’s identification of employability as a moderator introduces a critical dimension in talent management. Organizations might consider investing in employee development programs that enhance skill versatility and external marketability, paradoxically empowering workers while simultaneously encouraging greater engagement by reducing the psychological threat posed by cronyism. Balancing talent retention with individual employability emerges as a strategic priority.
The psychological consequences of cronyism elucidated here also resonate with broader societal concerns regarding fairness, equity, and justice in the workplace. In an era where diversity, inclusion, and mental health are foregrounded, understanding how covert preferential behaviors undermine these goals is paramount. This research invites leadership to reflect on systemic practices and cultivate cultures where identity safety and organizational trust are prioritized.
Further longitudinal inquiry is warranted to examine the temporal dynamics of these relationships, particularly how sustained exposure to cronyism influences long-term career trajectories and mental health outcomes. The snapshot provided by this study lays the groundwork for more nuanced explorations into whether psychological withdrawal ultimately results in actual turnover or if some employees become trapped in cycles of disengagement due to limited alternatives.
In conclusion, Xu, Shaheen, and Bari’s investigation offers a timely, vital contribution to the science of organizational behavior. By illuminating the pathways through which cronyism erodes employee–organization relationships, the study not only enhances theoretical understanding but also provides practical insights crucial for building healthier, more equitable work environments. Stakeholders across industries must heed these findings to preempt the silent epidemic of psychological withdrawal that threatens individual well-being and organizational performance alike.
This work underscores the critical importance of cultivating meritocratic, inclusive cultures that align organizational and employee identities. Psychological withdrawal, driven by disidentification in response to cronyism, reveals the fragile psychological contract at the heart of employment relationships. In fostering environments where employees feel genuinely valued for their contributions rather than their connections, organizations can unlock latent potential, improve job satisfaction, and secure competitive advantage in increasingly dynamic labor markets.
As workplaces continue to evolve amid technological innovation and demographic shifts, addressing the subtle yet consequential effects of cronyism on employee psychology represents a frontier in sustaining organizational health. This research paves the way for future interdisciplinary collaborations integrating psychology, management science, and labor economics to develop holistic frameworks for understanding and improving work life in the 21st century.
Subject of Research:
The psychological processes linking organizational cronyism to employee psychological withdrawal behavior, specifically examining disidentification as a mediator and employability as a moderator.
Article Title:
Organizational cronyism and employee psychological withdrawal behavior: the mediating role of disidentification and moderating effect of employability.
Article References:
Xu, C., Shaheen, S. & Bari, M.W. Organizational cronyism and employee psychological withdrawal behavior: the mediating role of disidentification and moderating effect of employability. BMC Psychol 13, 944 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03279-7
Image Credits: AI Generated
