In an era where education increasingly intersects with global socio-political realities, a groundbreaking study sheds light on how critical pedagogy can transform pre-service teacher education, especially within culturally and politically charged contexts. Conducted in Türkiye, this empirical inquiry focused on pre-service Arabic language teachers, exploring how their engagement with Middle Eastern news and conflict-related content influenced their critical thinking development and professional readiness. The significance of this work lies in its targeted approach—unlike broader examinations of critical pedagogy, it zeroes in on future educators’ evolving perspectives amid regionally sensitive material.
Critical pedagogy, a framework advocating educational practices that foster agency, reflexivity, and socio-political awareness, forms the core of this study’s intervention. The course at the center of the research was uniquely designed to integrate discussions on Middle Eastern affairs within Arabic language instruction. This innovative curriculum challenged traditional language-focused paradigms that often privilege grammatical proficiency at the expense of contextual and ideological understanding. By situating language learning within the fraught realities of media narratives and regional conflicts, the course provided fertile ground for pre-service teachers to develop nuanced cognitive skills.
Methodologically, the study diverged from prevailing trends that favor standardized critical thinking assessments like the California Critical Thinking Skills Test or Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment. Instead, it adopted a qualitative approach emphasizing reflective journals, in-depth interviews, and classroom observations. This choice enabled a richly textured exploration of how Turkish pre-service teachers navigated the intertwining of linguistic challenges and politically sensitive content. It allowed insights into the subtle shifts in their ideologies, emotional responses, and media literacy—all pivotal dimensions often obscured by quantitative measurements.
At the onset, participants revealed a predominant focus on language acquisition, demonstrating limited engagement with the critical analysis of world news, particularly events in the Middle East. This finding aligns with existing literature highlighting pre-service teachers’ tendencies to prioritize linguistic skills in foreign language courses. Hesitation to delve into socio-political discourse reflected not only curricular norms but also the sensitive nature of the Middle Eastern conflicts for Turkish learners, whose national identity and historical ties imbue such topics with complexity.
By the end of the course, however, a perceptible transformation emerged. Participants exhibited enhanced critical thinking capabilities characterized by a more sophisticated understanding of media bias, source credibility, and the ideological framing of news reports. Classroom discussions nurtured a critical stance towards mainstream media narratives, nurturing skepticism balanced by informed judgment—core competencies of critical media literacy. These developments resonated with theoretical frameworks such as Kellner and Share’s articulation of critical media literacy and Brookfield’s notions of reflective dialogue as a catalyst for cognitive development.
Despite the overall gains, the study highlighted an inherent tension between traditional expectations of language instruction and the aspirations of critical pedagogy. Some pre-service teachers expressed reluctance toward integrating socio-political discussions within the language curriculum, favoring a narrower linguistic focus. This schism underscores ongoing pedagogical debates about the appropriate balance between content mastery and critical engagement. It also reveals systemic challenges rooted in Türkiye’s exam-oriented education model, which privileges measurable linguistic proficiency over broader cognitive and affective competencies.
The course’s design leveraged conflict-related texts to simultaneously advance language skills and socio-cultural awareness. Pre-service teachers reported meaningful improvements in vocabulary acquisition, translation accuracy, and familiarity with political terminology, validating theories that emphasize the interdependence of language and culture in second language acquisition. More importantly, exposure to diverse viewpoints and media sources facilitated their development of comparative analytical skills, nurturing empathetic perspectives toward the multilayered conflicts engulfing the Middle East region.
The politically charged context of the course demanded a highly sensitive pedagogical approach. The instructor prioritized creating an inclusive and respectful classroom atmosphere, establishing ground rules for discourse and actively encouraging students to critically interrogate their own beliefs and media sources. This pedagogical stance was vital for navigating the complexities inherent in discussing contentious regional issues—an environment where emotional and ideological tensions frequently surface. Reflexivity on the part of the instructor also played a crucial role in mitigating observer bias and fostering authentic student engagement.
While the qualitative approach yielded rich insights, the researchers acknowledged limitations concerning the absence of standardized pre- and post-intervention critical thinking assessments. This gap restricts the objective quantification of individual cognitive gains and complicates cross-study comparability. Future research integrating mixed-method designs may address these challenges, enhancing both the robustness and generalizability of findings.
The homogeneity of the participant group—as Turkish native speakers learning Arabic—further circumscribes the broader applicability of the study’s conclusions. Nonetheless, this focused cohort provided valuable context-specific data illuminating how geopolitical narratives and national cultural affiliations shape educational experiences. Türkiye’s geopolitical role and proximity to the Middle East imbue the discourse with emotive force, which inevitably colors pre-service teachers’ reflective processes and critical engagement with media content.
In synthesizing these findings, the study offers compelling contributions to the discourse on critical pedagogy’s role in pre-service teacher preparation. It affirms that integrating socio-political content into language education can elevate pre-service teachers’ analytical capacities and sociocultural awareness, better equipping them to foster similar competencies in their future classrooms. At the same time, the work cautions against underestimating the institutional and ideological challenges inherent in reshaping traditional education models, particularly within nationally centralized and exam-driven frameworks.
The study also highlights the need for concerted institutional support to fully realize critical pedagogy’s potential within teacher education. This support encompasses curricular flexibility, professional development opportunities for educators, and resources that facilitate culturally responsive, scaffolded learning experiences. By acknowledging the emotional dimensions of politically sensitive topics and fostering empathetic, informed discourse, educational interventions can bridge the divide between conventional language instruction and transformative critical pedagogy.
Moreover, the empirical evidence underscores the power of collaborative learning and reflective dialogue in enabling pre-service teachers to traverse ideological boundaries and cement a critical stance. It points to the centrality of nurturing not only cognitive skills but also ethical awareness and socio-political responsibility as integral components of teacher education. Such an integrative approach promises to prepare educators who are not merely proficient linguistically but also critically attuned to the complexities of the world their students inhabit.
Ultimately, this study sets a precedent for future investigations exploring the intersections of language education, critical pedagogy, and socio-political awareness within diverse cultural contexts. It calls for broader, more inclusive research designs to capture the multifaceted dimensions of pre-service teachers’ development and to tailor pedagogical practices that meet the demands of an increasingly interconnected and contested global landscape.
Subject of Research: Critical Pedagogy in Pre-Service Teacher Education within Arabic Language Instruction Contexts in Türkiye
Article Title: The implementation of critical pedagogy in Turkish pre-service teacher education: an empirical case study
Article References:
Güngenci, M.M. The implementation of critical pedagogy in Turkish pre-service teacher education: an empirical case study. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 1886 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06158-z
Image Credits: AI Generated
