In recent years, the intersection of community participation and the evolving landscape of healthcare delivery has commanded significant attention within the global health discourse. A groundbreaking scoping review by Khan, Haddad, Rao, and their colleagues published in the International Journal for Equity in Health has synthesized a vast array of evidence exploring the critical partnership between state and non-state actors in primary care. This comprehensive study appeals not only to health policymakers but also to academics and practitioners striving to bolster equitable healthcare access worldwide. As the healthcare sector grapples with increasingly complex challenges, understanding how communities can effectively engage in contractual arrangements with government and non-governmental providers offers a promising pathway to more resilient health systems.
The traditional model of state-led primary care is undergoing rapid transformation, fueled by the growing recognition that community engagement is essential for achieving universal health coverage. The review meticulously catalogs numerous instances in which community participation is not merely consultative but embedded within formal contracting mechanisms. Such contracts clearly delineate roles and responsibilities between governments and non-state actors—including NGOs, private providers, and community-based organizations—integrating them into the broader health ecosystem. This approach aims to harness local knowledge, trust, and tailored interventions while ensuring accountability and quality of care.
One of the salient findings is that community participation enhances both the design and implementation of primary care services. The review highlights how community members, when involved in decision-making and oversight, help shape health priorities that better reflect local needs. This participatory contracting model challenges the top-down bureaucratic frameworks that have historically marginalized grassroots voices. The evidence presented underscores that engaging communities in contractual arrangements is linked to improved health outcomes, greater service utilization, and enhanced satisfaction among users, especially in underserved and marginalized populations.
Delving deeper into technical aspects, the review elucidates the diverse contractual modalities employed globally. From performance-based contracts incentivizing non-state providers to more collaborative agreements emphasizing co-management, the typology of contracts is highly context-dependent. Each model embeds varying degrees of community agency, from tokenistic advisory roles to robust participation that influences budget allocation, service planning, and monitoring practices. This heterogeneity reflects the complex interplay of political will, institutional capacity, and socio-cultural factors, all of which frame the success or limitations of participatory contracting in primary care.
Furthermore, the study draws attention to the structural and operational challenges inherent in forging effective partnerships. A critical issue identified is the capacity gap at the community level, which can undermine meaningful engagement. Effective participation requires not only awareness but also technical expertise, organizational infrastructure, and sustained support from state actors. The review underscores the importance of capacity-building initiatives and institutional incentives that empower communities to fulfill contractual obligations and exercise oversight. Without such scaffolding, contracts risk becoming symbolic instruments rather than vehicles for transformative change.
Another dimension explored involves the accountability mechanisms embedded within these contracts. The authors rigorously analyze how formal agreements delineate monitoring, reporting, and compliance parameters. Community monitoring committees, social audits, and participatory evaluations emerge as pivotal tools that translate contractual clauses into practice. The review identifies a growing evidence base suggesting that when communities hold non-state actors accountable through clearly defined processes, the quality and equity of primary care services improve substantially. This finding propels an important paradigm shift away from centralized control toward distributed governance involving bottom-up feedback loops.
Crucially, the review juxtaposes contexts where state and non-state actor collaborations thrive against those where they falter. Political commitment emerges as a linchpin for success; without sustained governmental backing, contractual arrangements are often precarious and short-lived. The authors reveal that countries exhibiting strong policy frameworks promoting decentralization, transparency, and community rights tend to report more effective community participation in primary care contracts. Conversely, in settings plagued by corruption, weak oversight, or authoritarian tendencies, participatory contracting often degenerates into a procedural formality devoid of substantive community influence.
The evidence also encompasses a broad geographical spectrum, from low-income rural regions to urban settings in middle-income countries, illustrating the adaptability of participatory contracting models. Case studies elucidate how cultural norms, social capital, and local governance structures shape community engagement modalities. For instance, in certain contexts, traditional leadership frameworks are integrated into contractual processes, thereby enhancing legitimacy and compliance. This socio-cultural sensitivity ensures that contractual partnerships resonate with the communities’ lived realities, reinforcing the sustainability and efficacy of primary care interventions.
Importantly, the review addresses the cost-effectiveness and resource implications of community participation in contractual frameworks. Although initial investments in capacity-building and coordination can present financial challenges, the long-term returns manifest in improved health indicators and reduced hospitalizations. By leveraging community actors’ proximity and trust, primary care services achieve higher outreach and efficiency, mitigating systemic burdens on tertiary care facilities. The authors advocate that governments and donors recognize participatory contracting not merely as an ethical imperative but also as a strategic investment to optimize limited health resources.
The scope of the review extends to the political economy underpinning state-non-state actor relations. It critically examines power dynamics and potential conflicts of interest that arise in contractual engagements. The study reveals instances where dominant actors within communities may capture decision-making processes, excluding marginalized groups and perpetuating inequities. The authors emphasize the importance of equitable representation and inclusive governance mechanisms within participation frameworks to safeguard against such pitfalls. Transparent procedures and conflict resolution pathways become essential components in ensuring that contractual community participation genuinely serves all population segments.
Moreover, technological advancements are identified as emerging enablers of participatory contracting. Digital platforms facilitate real-time data sharing, performance tracking, and community feedback, enhancing transparency and responsiveness. Integration of information and communication technologies into contractual arrangements may offer scalable solutions to long-standing challenges related to fragmentation and accountability. The review calls for further research into leveraging these innovations, particularly in resource-constrained settings where traditional oversight mechanisms are limited.
The implications of this review resonate profoundly with global commitments such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the push for health equity. By bridging gaps between formal health systems and communities through contractual modalities, governments can effectively decentralize service delivery while safeguarding standards. The nuanced understanding provided by the study equips policymakers with evidence-informed strategies to design and implement participatory contracting mechanisms that are contextually appropriate and socially just.
In conclusion, this comprehensive review by Khan and colleagues marks a seminal contribution to the health systems literature. It surfaces critical insights into how community participation, when institutionalized through contractual agreements between state and non-state actors, can drive more equitable, accountable, and sustainable primary care services globally. For practitioners and policymakers alike, these findings advocate for a paradigm shift—recognizing communities not as passive recipients but as active partners in building resilient health systems fit for the complex challenges of the 21st century.
As the world faces unprecedented health crises and social inequities, harnessing the power of participatory contracting in primary care presents a compelling opportunity to redefine healthcare delivery. Through collaborative governance, transparent accountability, and culturally rooted engagement, the pathway toward equitable health for all becomes tangible. This evidence synthesized in the review is poised to inspire policy reforms and practical innovations that catalyze systemic transformation worldwide, shaping the future of primary healthcare for generations to come.
Subject of Research: Community participation and contractual relationships between state and non-state actors in primary healthcare delivery.
Article Title: Community participation and contracting between state and non-state actors in primary care: A scoping review of evidence.
Article References:
Khan, Z., Haddad, F., Rao, V. et al. Community participation and contracting between state and non-state actors in primary care: A scoping review of evidence. Int J Equity Health 24, 199 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02567-3
Image Credits: AI Generated
