In a groundbreaking advancement for adolescent mental health assessment, researchers have unveiled a culturally tailored tool designed specifically for Chinese clinical settings: the Chinese version of the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised, or C-SITBI-R. This novel instrument addresses a crucial gap in psychiatric evaluation by providing a precise and culturally competent methodology for identifying non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidal behaviors among youth—a demographic increasingly vulnerable in China and worldwide. This development marks a significant stride towards global mental health parity by adapting established Western diagnostic frameworks to meet local clinical needs.
Mental health professionals in China have long grappled with the challenge of adequately measuring self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) in adolescents, due to the lack of culturally sensitive, comprehensive, and psychometrically sound tools. Existing instruments often overlook nuanced cultural expressions and manifestations of distress, leading to underdiagnosis or misinterpretation of severity. The C-SITBI-R stands out by not only translating but also rigorously validating the original SITBI-R to ensure fidelity to Chinese linguistic and cultural contexts, enabling more accurate detection and intervention in clinical settings.
The research team recruited 170 adolescents aged between 12 and 19 from two leading psychiatric hospitals to validate this tool. This robust sample allowed for comprehensive psychometric evaluation including content validity, construct validity, and reliability assessments. The study meticulously compared responses from the C-SITBI-R with those from widely utilized instruments such as the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) and various self-report scales, as well as DSM-5 diagnostic criteria underpinning contemporary psychiatric manuals. Such multidimensional validation confirms not only the instrument’s reliability but also its diagnostic accuracy.
Notably, the C-SITBI-R demonstrated outstanding content validity with indices reaching perfect scores (I-CVI = 1.00, S-CVI/UA = 1.00), indicating that the tool comprehensively covers relevant symptoms and behaviors. Construct validity was affirmed through significant correlations with established diagnostic instruments, affirming that the C-SITBI-R measures the targeted psychological constructs effectively. These outcomes signify that clinicians can trust the tool’s ability to capture the complexities of SITBs among Chinese adolescents, which is essential for tailoring effective treatment plans.
Interrater reliability measures were exemplary, with all kappa and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) achieving a flawless 1.00, underscoring the consistency of diagnostic conclusions irrespective of the administering clinician. The test-retest reliability similarly reflected excellent stability over time for lifetime presence and timing of SITBs, with kappa scores between 0.78 and 1.00 and ICCs from 0.93 to 1.00. This reliability is critical given the fluctuating nature of self-injurious behaviors and the need for repeated assessments in clinical practice.
For more transient variables, such as the frequency of SITBs within the past month, the C-SITBI-R still showed moderate to strong consistency (ICCs ranging from 0.64 to 0.75), ensuring that clinicians can monitor changes over time with confidence. These reliability metrics support the instrument’s utility not only in initial diagnosis but also in ongoing therapeutic monitoring and risk assessment, thereby facilitating dynamic patient management.
Diagnostic consistency with DSM-5 criteria was remarkable, particularly for NSSI, where perfect agreement (κ = 1.00) was observed, alongside a high concordance for suicidal behavior disorder (SBD) (κ = 0.86). Furthermore, agreement with the M.I.N.I. suicide risk assessment was also notably high (κ = 0.94), demonstrating that the C-SITBI-R aligns well with international standards while rooted in cultural specificity. These findings suggest the tool is clinically robust, capable of enhancing decision-making and intervention outcomes.
The C-SITBI-R’s cultural adaptation extends beyond linguistic translation to embrace culturally ingrained expressions of distress and societal perspectives on mental health. This adaptation addresses the nuanced ways adolescents in China may experience and report SITBs, which may differ significantly from those in Western nations. For example, factors such as stigma, family dynamics, and societal expectations are embedded into the instrument’s framework, enhancing its relevance and acceptance in Chinese psychiatric practice.
Importantly, the introduction of the C-SITBI-R enters a broader conversation about the global mental health crisis among youth. With suicide being a leading cause of death in adolescents worldwide, and self-injury behaviors often preceding suicidal attempts, having precise screening and diagnostic tools is a public health imperative. The C-SITBI-R’s deployment offers a scalable strategy for early identification, which is fundamental to preventative mental healthcare initiatives.
The implications for clinical practice are profound. By equipping clinicians with a reliable and culturally tuned instrument, the chances of timely detection and treatment of SITBs significantly improve. This enhances the potential for targeted therapeutic interventions and reduces the risk of suicide, which remains a tragic and preventable outcome. Moreover, the tool’s strong psychometric properties suggest it could be integrated into standard psychiatric assessments, facilitating broader systemic improvements in adolescent mental healthcare across China.
In conclusion, the development and validation of the C-SITBI-R represent a pivotal contribution to both research and clinical fields, bridging cultural divides in psychiatric assessment. This advancement sets a precedent for localized adaptations of mental health instruments, encouraging cross-cultural research collaborations and informing public health policies aimed at reducing youth suicide rates globally. The study’s findings promise to transform clinical approaches to adolescent mental health in China, potentially serving as a model for similar initiatives worldwide.
As mental health continues gaining visibility on global health agendas, tools like the C-SITBI-R exemplify the critical integration of cultural competence and scientific rigor necessary for impactful intervention. This research underscores the essential need to contextualize mental health diagnostics within cultural frameworks to effectively address the escalating crisis of self-injury and suicidal behaviors among youth, inspiring hope for more sensitive and effective psychological care.
Subject of Research:
Assessment and validation of the Chinese version of the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised for evaluating non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behaviors among Chinese adolescents in clinical settings.
Article Title:
The Chinese version of the Self-Injurious thoughts and behaviors Interview-Revised (C-SITBI-R): assessing NSSI and suicidal behaviors among adolescents in clinical settings.
Article References:
Liu, YH., Liang, JR., Hu, JH. et al. The Chinese version of the Self-Injurious thoughts and behaviors Interview-Revised (C-SITBI-R): assessing NSSI and suicidal behaviors among adolescents in clinical settings. BMC Psychiatry 25, 989 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07443-6
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07443-6
Keywords:
Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors, Adolescents, Non-Suicidal Self-Injury, Suicidal Behavior Disorder, Psychiatric Assessment, Cultural Adaptation, Psychometrics, Diagnostic Tools, DSM-5, Clinical Psychiatry, China, Mental Health
