In recent years, breakfast clubs in schools have emerged as a multifaceted intervention aimed primarily at improving the nutritional status of socially disadvantaged children. However, a comprehensive study conducted in the Czech Republic reveals a complex evolution of these programmes, where educational and socialisation objectives frequently eclipse their original nutritional intent. This adaptive dynamic raises profound questions about the fidelity of intervention design and its practical implementation across varying institutional environments.
At the heart of the investigation lies a critical observation: schools tend to prioritize breakfast club activities aligned with their core competencies and institutional mandates. Naturally, educators gravitate towards educational and socialisation goals within breakfast clubs, given their ingrained pedagogical focus. The nutritional aspect, despite being the original priority, often remains peripheral unless explicit, rigid guidelines emphasize its importance. This trend indicates a fundamental divergence between intervention design and real-world application, underlining an intrinsic tension between programme fidelity and contextual adaptation.
The research highlights that without stringent external direction, schools will tailor breakfast clubs to their perceived immediate needs and capabilities. The educational dimension flourishes because schools possess the resources, expertise, and infrastructure to support it organically. Even more interestingly, the socialisation component receives heightened attention, signifying its perceived value as a supplementary developmental vehicle for pupils—an area that the standard school curriculum may not adequately address. This redistributive focus suggests that breakfast clubs serve as unanticipated platforms for broader child development beyond nutrition.
This shift away from a strict nutritional mandate is far from arbitrary. Instead, it reflects nuanced school responses to practical challenges and local needs. The original nutritional emphasis is subtly but systematically overshadowed, a phenomenon traceable to ambiguous or imprecise guidelines that fail to enforce a clear prioritization of nutrition in breakfast club design. Consequently, schools exploit flexibility in implementation to foster elements such as healthy eating awareness, table manners, and social interaction, which they identify as critical developmental targets.
Paradoxically, these adaptations may seem like deviations from the original intervention intent but in reality, they sustain the overarching project aim: enhancing academic success, motivation, and well-being among socially disadvantaged children. Although the fidelity of nutritional intervention remains low, the fidelity to the broader goal of supporting children’s academic readiness and social engagement bears out as relatively high. This nuanced understanding complicates traditional dichotomies between fidelity and adaptation, presenting a more fluid model where deviation can coexist with, or even reinforce, core intervention outcomes.
The iterative nature of the project’s implementation is crucial to understanding these dynamics. In its first year, the initiative progressed through three phases—exploration, installation, and initial implementation—each characterized by specific challenges and learning opportunities. During exploration, schools identified technical barriers that impeded smooth execution. Installation witnessed the launch of breakfast clubs, unveiling practical problems on the ground. Importantly, ongoing evaluation during early implementation highlighted significant goal shifts and underlined the need to sharpen the programme’s nutritional focus. These findings ultimately prompted administrative revisions to the Tool Catalogue, explicitly re-centering nutrition as the programme’s primary goal in subsequent phases.
This trajectory exemplifies an action-oriented, adaptive implementation model in contrast to rigid, linear intervention deployment frameworks. By systematically incorporating real-time feedback, the model promotes continuous quality improvement, ensuring that interventions remain responsive to frontline experiences and contexts. Such flexibility not only enhances the sustainability of the breakfast clubs but also their efficacy, by allowing schools to integrate emerging needs and insights into programme operation dynamically.
The deviation phenomenon documented in this research is consistent with prior scientific literature examining whole-school health promotion strategies globally. Notably, research by Vennegoor and colleagues (2023) reported significant variations in programme adherence and stakeholder engagement across different school settings, underscoring challenges in maintaining fidelity to initial intervention goals. These patterns echo in the Czech case study, where schools selectively adopted breakfast club elements resonant with their pedagogical orientations, often at the expense of broader implementation challenges, including comprehensive stakeholder involvement.
The findings reinforce the critical role of early and ongoing evaluation mechanisms in understanding the causes and implications of goal shifts and programmatic adaptations. Bopp et al. (2013) previously emphasized this perspective, advocating for evaluation integrated from the outset of implementation. This approach enables identification of not only obstacles but also opportunities for innovation, thereby informing flexible strategies that reconcile programme design with on-the-ground realities.
An essential theoretical contribution of this research is its alignment with Ginsburg et al.’s (2021) conceptual framework, which distinguishes core from peripheral intervention components. By explicitly defining core elements crucial to maintaining theoretical fidelity and impact mechanisms, practitioners can better discern which adaptations are acceptable and which risk diluting or negating intended outcomes. In the context of breakfast clubs, the nutritional component constitutes a core element, yet schools’ adaptations reflect ongoing negotiation between fidelity and pragmatism within complex, resource-constrained educational milieus.
The observed evolution of breakfast club goals vividly illustrates the multifaceted challenges of implementing standardized interventions at scale within diverse school ecosystems. Each school’s unique priorities, resources, and constraints profoundly shape programme delivery, necessitating a delicate balance in guideline formulation. Clear, detailed objectives are indispensable to preserving core intervention integrity while simultaneously permitting contextual tailoring essential for real-world feasibility and engagement.
Beyond fidelity concerns, the study’s insights emphasize the potential of evaluation not merely as a monitoring tool but as a catalyst for innovation and improvement. Through systematic capture of school staff experiences and perspectives, evaluations unearth unmet needs and emergent themes otherwise overlooked in top-down programme designs. This feedback loop empowers the co-creation of tailored solutions that resonate with local contexts and effectively address educational disparities.
Framing these results within the broader discourse on educational interventions targeting social inequality and food insecurity further enriches their significance. Well-designed, adaptable programmes such as breakfast clubs can play pivotal roles in mitigating disparities but require continuous recalibration. Achieving an optimal fit between planned goals and contextual realities demands vigilant, iterative evaluation processes that validate and refine intervention strategies in real time.
Ultimately, the Czech breakfast club study challenges simplistic conceptions of intervention fidelity, advocating for a more nuanced, dynamic understanding of programme implementation in complex social settings. It illustrates how interventions, despite inevitable adaptations, can uphold and even augment their principal objectives when aligned with frontline realities. Such findings hold valuable lessons for policymakers, educators, and researchers committed to designing effective, sustainable programmes that bridge health, education, and social domains for the benefit of vulnerable populations.
As educational systems worldwide grapple with increasing diversity and multifactorial challenges, embracing flexible, evaluation-informed approaches will be imperative. The insights derived from this research underscore the transformative potential of adaptive implementation models and reinforce the centrality of clear prioritization, continuous feedback, and local empowerment in the pursuit of equitable child development outcomes through interventions such as breakfast clubs.
Subject of Research:
Article Title:
Article References:
Simonová, J., Straková, J. Breakfast clubs in the Czech Republic: food security, socialisation, education, or participation? The evolution of intervention goals. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 799 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04889-7
Image Credits: AI Generated
