In a groundbreaking study published in the 2025 issue of Genus, sociologist and gender studies expert S. Bercovich Szulmajster offers a pioneering analysis of educational inequalities through a nuanced, multidimensional gender lens that transcends traditional binary frameworks. This innovative research not only challenges long-established paradigms of gender categorization but also delves deeply into how these binaries have shaped unequal educational opportunities worldwide. The study calls for more inclusive and complex gender perspectives to dismantle persistent inequities that education systems reproduce, illuminating a path towards more equitable academic interventions and policies.
For decades, the prevalent approach to understanding gender in education has predominantly revolved around a male-female binary classification. Such narrow frameworks have systematically marginalized those who do not fit neatly into these categories, including transgender, non-binary, genderqueer, and other gender-diverse individuals. Bercovich Szulmajster’s research critiques this reductionist approach, emphasizing how simplistic binaries fail to capture the full spectrum of gender identities and experiences. By incorporating intersectionality and multidimensional gender constructs, the study presents education as a complex social field influenced by multiple overlapping identities and systemic power structures.
Central to this study is the concept of a multidimensional gender perspective, which integrates gender as a fluid and dynamic construct encompassing identity, expression, roles, and social recognition. Bercovich Szulmajster posits that a rigid binary system enforces normative standards that perpetuate discrimination and exclusion within educational institutions. The research methodology meticulously combines quantitative data analysis with qualitative ethnographic fieldwork in diverse educational settings across multiple countries, offering a comprehensive view of the subtle and overt mechanisms through which gender inequalities are produced and sustained.
One of the pivotal findings of the study is that gender-based educational disparities are not solely the byproduct of biology or individual choice but are fundamentally embedded within institutional structures and cultural norms. Educational policies, curricula design, teacher attitudes, and peer interactions all contribute to reinforcing gender binaries and their associated hierarchies. For example, curricula often perpetuate stereotypes by valorizing traditionally masculine or feminine subjects, thereby influencing students’ academic trajectories and career aspirations based on their gender presentation.
Moreover, Bercovich Szulmajster highlights the intersection of gender with race, socioeconomic status, disability, and sexual orientation as critical to understanding compounded educational disadvantages. Non-binary and transgender students from marginalized ethnic or economic backgrounds face heightened risks of exclusion, harassment, and lower academic performance, as their identities intersect with multiple axes of oppression. This multidimensional analysis foregrounds the urgency of policy reforms that address these overlapping vulnerabilities rather than employing one-size-fits-all gender solutions.
The study also explores the role of gender socialization starting from early childhood education. It reveals how gendered expectations are ingrained through seemingly innocuous practices such as classroom seating arrangements, teacher feedback styles, and extracurricular activity options. These subtle reinforcements contribute to internalized gender norms that restrict student agency and self-expression. Importantly, Bercovich Szulmajster argues, failing to recognize and accommodate non-conforming gender expressions undermines psychological wellbeing and academic engagement, contributing to higher dropout rates among gender-diverse youth.
In analyzing policy frameworks, the research calls attention to the inadequacies of current gender inclusion policies across global education systems. Many initiatives focus on promoting female participation in STEM or combating gender-based violence, yet rarely address the needs and rights of students beyond the binary gender model. Bercovich Szulmajster advocates for comprehensive gender policies that incorporate diversity training for educators, curriculum revision to include multiple gender narratives, and safe spaces for gender-diverse students to foster inclusivity and resilience.
Technological advancements and the digitalization of education emerge as critical arenas for rethinking gender categorization. Online learning platforms and virtual classrooms have started to offer more customizable and anonymous environments where students can explore and express their gender identities with less stigma. However, the study warns against uncritical reliance on digital solutions, noting that access disparities and algorithmic biases can replicate existing inequalities unless inclusivity is intentionally designed into these systems.
Bercovich Szulmajster’s methodological approach also pushes the boundaries of traditional gender research by employing advanced statistical models that allow for the analysis of gender as a multidimensional variable rather than a binary category. This technical innovation enables the detection of nuanced patterns and correlations that standard methods overlook. The study’s use of latent class analysis and multi-level modeling provides robust empirical support for advocating expanded gender classifications in educational research and practice.
The implications of this research extend beyond the academic realm into the practical and political domains. Educators and policymakers are urged to reconceptualize accountability measures to track educational outcomes through multiple gender dimensions, ensuring that interventions are responsive to diverse student needs. The study also envisions collaborations between education stakeholders, gender rights organizations, and communities to co-create curricula and policies that validate and empower all gender identities.
Additionally, the research underscores the importance of teacher education and professional development in addressing gender biases. Teachers are frontline agents in mediating gender norms and can play a transformative role if equipped with comprehensive gender literacy. Bercovich Szulmajster critiques current teacher training programs for their superficial engagement with gender issues, urging a systemic overhaul that systematically integrates a multidimensional gender framework throughout the pedagogical pipeline.
This work importantly contributes to a growing body of scholarship calling for the decolonization of gender studies and educational theory. By challenging Western-centric binary models and incorporating diverse cultural understandings of gender, the study opens space for pluralistic and context-sensitive approaches. This global perspective enriches debates on gender and education by acknowledging how indigenous, non-Western, and localized gender identities interact with formal education systems in complex ways.
Critically, the study sidesteps simplistic narratives of victimhood and instead adopts an empowerment paradigm. It highlights examples of educational communities that have successfully implemented inclusive practices inspired by multidimensional gender perspectives, fostering environments where gender-diverse students thrive academically and socially. These case studies provide invaluable templates and evidence of transformative potential within education.
In conclusion, Bercovich Szulmajster’s study represents a paradigm shift in gender and education research, advocating for the dismantling of binary gender constructs through comprehensive, intersectional, and multidimensional approaches. By exposing the structural roots of gender-based inequalities and proposing actionable frameworks for reform, the research paves the way for more just and equitable education systems worldwide. Its technical rigor, conceptual innovation, and rich empirical data position it as a seminal contribution that will shape discourse and practice on gender and education for years to come.
This work is a clarion call for researchers, educators, and policymakers to embrace complexity and inclusivity, recognizing gender not as a limitation but as a rich spectrum of human diversity that can enrich and transform educational experiences for all.
Subject of Research: Educational inequalities analyzed through a multidimensional gender perspective beyond the binary framework.
Article Title: Categorizing gender beyond the binary: inequalities in education from a multidimensional gender perspective.
Article References:
Bercovich Szulmajster, S. Categorizing gender beyond the binary: inequalities in education from a multidimensional gender perspective. Genus 81, 29 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-025-00271-2
Image Credits: AI Generated
